Literature DB >> 28284749

Can the timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after biliary pancreatitis change the conversion rate to open surgery?

Fikret Aksoy1, Gökhan Demiral2, Özgür Ekinci3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biliary pancreatitis (BP) constitutes 30-55% of all cases of acute pancreatitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease. We aimed to compare and evaluate the relation between the timing of LC and the rates and reasons of conversion to open surgery (OS) after BP.
METHODS: Data were collected of patients who presented for the first time with acute BP and underwent LC. The patients were divided into two groups: early cholecystectomy (Group 1), patients who underwent cholecystectomy during the first pancreatitis attack upon admission and before discharge from hospital (1-3 days); and late cholecystectomy (Group 2), patients who received medical treatment during their first pancreatitis episode and underwent surgery after 4-10 weeks. Sex, Ranson scores, American Society of Anesthesiology scores, and conversion reasons were compared.
RESULTS: Group 1 and Group 2 included 75 patients (20 men, 55 women) and 87 patients (25 men, 62 women), respectively. The mean age was 44.7 years (range, 21-82 years). Obscure anatomy with adhesions was detected in 16 patients (5 in Group 1, 11 in Group 2) as the leading cause of conversion to OS, but it was not statistically significant (p=0.054). Acute inflammation with empyema and peripancreatic liquid collection was observed in 14 patients (12 in Group 1, 2 in Group 2), and conversion to OS was statistically significantly higher in Group 1 (p=0.016).
CONCLUSION: Timing of LC does not influence the conversion rates to OS after BP.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conversion to open surgery; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; pancreatitis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28284749     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  6 in total

1.  Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis with Mild Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Hai-Feng Yu; Tong Guo; Peng Xie; Zhi-Wei Zhang; Ya-Hong Yu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-29

2.  Detection of Common Bile Duct Stones in Mild Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Using Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  David Aranovich; Veacheslav Zilbermints; Natalia Goldberg; Oleg Kaminsky
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-10-22

3.  The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fu-Ping Zhong; Kai Wang; Xue-Qin Tan; Jian Nie; Wen-Feng Huang; Xiao-Fang Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Early vs late cholecystectomy in mild gall stone pancreatitis: An updated meta-analysis and review of literature.

Authors:  Saqib Walayat; Muhammad Baig; Srinivas R Puli
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Intraoperative cholangiography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis: A prospective study in a second-level hospital.

Authors:  Gustavo Angel Gómez-Torres; Jaime González-Hernández; Carlos Rene López-Lizárraga; Eliseo Navarro-Muñiz; Odeth Sherlyne Ortega-García; Francisco Manuel Bonnet-Lemus; Francisco Manuel Abarca-Rendon; Liliana Faviola De la Cerda-Trujillo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Same-admission versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Xiao Lyu; Yun-Xiao Cheng; Hang-Fei Jin; Xin Jin; Bin Cheng; Dian Lu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.