Literature DB >> 28284607

Transmission of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 to and from vaccinated pigs in a one-to-one model.

E Pileri1, E Gibert2, G E Martín-Valls2, M Nofrarias2, S López-Soria2, M Martín1, I Díaz2, L Darwich1, E Mateu3.   

Abstract

The present study examined transmission by contact of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) 1 in a one-to-one model to vaccinated and unvaccinated pigs and from vaccinated infected pigs to other vaccinated pigs. The experiment started by randomly assigning weaned pigs to groups V (n=24) and U (n=26). V pigs were vaccinated with a commercial live attenuated PRRSV vaccine and the U animals were kept as unvaccinated controls. Twenty-eight days later, 6U pigs were separated and allocated in individual boxes. The remaining 20U pigs were intranasally inoculated with PRRSV isolate 3267 (from now on designated as seeder (S) pigs) and 48h later were distributed in boxes where they were commingled with either V or U pigs in 1:1 groups (first contact phase), resulting in 6S:U and 14S:V pairs. As soon as a V pig was detected to be viremic because of contact with a S, the infected V (from now on designated as Vinf) was transferred (<24h after detection) to a new pen where it was comingled with a new V pig (designated as V2) in a second contact phase. For the first contact phase, pigs were maintained 21days at maximum and for the second contact phase the maximum exposure period was 14days. Two V pigs tested positive for the vaccine virus (>99.5% similarity) when they were relocated with the corresponding V2 pigs and they were removed; thus, only 12Vinf were finally considered. All V pigs (12/12) exposed to S animals became infected although the first detection of viremia occurred at 13.6±3.6days, one week later than in U (p<0.05). Also, duration of viremia was shorter for Vinf compared to U, (5.5±4.3days versus 12.5±2.7days). The Vinf group showed remarkable individual variability: eight animals had a viremic period of 5 or less days (3.0±1.4) while the remaining four had a longer viremic period of more than one week (10.8±2.9). This situation was not observed in U. In the second contact phase, transmission from Vinf to V2 pigs occurred in 7/8 cases (87.5%). The mean duration of viremia for V2 was 4.8±3.4 and two different patterns were again observed: two animals had viremias of 9-10days and the rest averaged 3.0±1.4days (range: 2-5days). Vaccinated groups Vinf and V2 had a significantly lower PRRSV shedding in oral fluids for at least the first 9days after the onset of the viremia compared to U, and shedding for V2 was even significantly lower (p<0.05) than shedding for Vinf. Our experimental design reproduced the worst-case scenario for evaluating the effect of vaccination and, under such conditions; it was still efficacious in slowering PRRSV transmission and decreasing the global viral load and particularly oral shedding.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus; Transmission; Vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28284607     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of the genetic diversity and mRNA expression level in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccinated pigs that developed short or long viremias after challenge.

Authors:  Martí Cortey; Gaston Arocena; Tahar Ait-Ali; Anna Vidal; Yanli Li; Gerard Martín-Valls; Alison D Wilson; Allan L Archibald; Enric Mateu; Laila Darwich
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.683

2.  Improving the management procedures in farms infected with the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus using PDP models.

Authors:  Ma Àngels Colomer; Antoni Margalida; Lorenzo Fraile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Modified Live Virus Vaccine: A "Leaky" Vaccine with Debatable Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Xinna Ge; Hanchun Yang
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-09

4.  A Multiplex RT-PCR Assay to Detect and Discriminate Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Viruses in Clinical Specimens.

Authors:  Keli Yang; Yongxiang Tian; Danna Zhou; Zhengying Duan; Rui Guo; Zewen Liu; Fangyan Yuan; Wei Liu
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Safety and long-lasting immunity of the combined administration of a modified-live virus vaccine against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 and an inactivated vaccine against porcine parvovirus and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae in breeding pigs.

Authors:  Almudena Sánchez-Matamoros; Agustí Camprodon; Jaime Maldonado; Rafael Pedrazuela; Joel Miranda
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2019-04-25

6.  Bottlenecks in the transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV1) to naïve pigs and the quasi-species variation of the virus during infection in vaccinated pigs.

Authors:  Martí Cortey; Gastón Arocena; Emanuela Pileri; Gerard Martín-Valls; Enric Mateu
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.683

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.