| Literature DB >> 28284440 |
Gary Edmond1, Alice Towler2, Bethany Growns3, Gianni Ribeiro4, Bryan Found5, David White6, Kaye Ballantyne7, Rachel A Searston8, Matthew B Thompson9, Jason M Tangen10, Richard I Kemp11, Kristy Martire12.
Abstract
Human factors and their implications for forensic science have attracted increasing levels of interest across criminal justice communities in recent years. Initial interest centred on cognitive biases, but has since expanded such that knowledge from psychology and cognitive science is slowly infiltrating forensic practices more broadly. This article highlights a series of important findings and insights of relevance to forensic practitioners. These include research on human perception, memory, context information, expertise, decision-making, communication, experience, verification, confidence, and feedback. The aim of this article is to sensitise forensic practitioners (and lawyers and judges) to a range of potentially significant issues, and encourage them to engage with research in these domains so that they may adapt procedures to improve performance, mitigate risks and reduce errors. Doing so will reduce the divide between forensic practitioners and research scientists as well as improve the value and utility of forensic science evidence.Entities:
Keywords: Bias; Experience; Expert; Human factors; Performance; Psychology; Training
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28284440 DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2016.11.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Justice ISSN: 1355-0306 Impact factor: 2.124