BACKGROUND: "Academic surgeon" describes a member of a medical school department of surgery, but this term does not fully define the important role of such physician-scientists in advancing surgical science through translational research and innovation. METHODS: The curriculum vitae and self-descriptive vignettes of the records of achievement of seven surgeons possessing documented records of academic leadership, innovation, and dissemination of knowledge were reviewed. RESULTS: Out analysis yielded seven attributes of the archetypal academic surgeon: 1) identifies complex clinical problems ignored or thought unsolvable by others, 2) becomes an expert, 3) innovates to advance treatment, 4) observes outcomes to further improve and innovate, 5) disseminates knowledge and expertise, 6) asks important questions to further improve care, and 7) trains the next generation of surgeons and scientists. CONCLUSION: Although alternative pathways to innovation and academic contribution also exist, the academic surgeon typically devotes years of careful observation, analysis, and iterative investigation to identify and solve challenging or unexplored clinical problems, ideally leverages resources available in academic medical centers to support these endeavors.
BACKGROUND: "Academic surgeon" describes a member of a medical school department of surgery, but this term does not fully define the important role of such physician-scientists in advancing surgical science through translational research and innovation. METHODS: The curriculum vitae and self-descriptive vignettes of the records of achievement of seven surgeons possessing documented records of academic leadership, innovation, and dissemination of knowledge were reviewed. RESULTS: Out analysis yielded seven attributes of the archetypal academic surgeon: 1) identifies complex clinical problems ignored or thought unsolvable by others, 2) becomes an expert, 3) innovates to advance treatment, 4) observes outcomes to further improve and innovate, 5) disseminates knowledge and expertise, 6) asks important questions to further improve care, and 7) trains the next generation of surgeons and scientists. CONCLUSION: Although alternative pathways to innovation and academic contribution also exist, the academic surgeon typically devotes years of careful observation, analysis, and iterative investigation to identify and solve challenging or unexplored clinical problems, ideally leverages resources available in academic medical centers to support these endeavors.
Authors: Christopher J LaRocca; Paul Wong; Oliver S Eng; Mustafa Raoof; Susanne G Warner; Laleh G Melstrom Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2018-08-19 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Caitlin Halbert; Robert Catania; David Earle; Igor Elyash; Nicole Fearing; Seung Gwon; Rohan Joseph; Fernando Mier; Andrew Morfesi; Roy Shen; Daniel Slack; Shirin Towfigh; Jarvis Walters; Kevin Wasco; Debbie Youngelman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Ivan David Lozada-Martinez; Nicolas Navarro-Pulido; Yelson Alejandro Picón-Jaimes; Gonzalo Dominguez-Alvarado; Luis Felipe Cabrera-Vargas; Lilian Torregrosa-Almonacid; Oscar Guevara-Cruz; Alexis Rafael Narvaez-Rojas Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2022-09-15
Authors: Marek A Hansdorfer; Sydney R Horen; Brandon E Alba; Jennifer N Akin; Amir H Dorafshar; Adan Z Becerra Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-03-26
Authors: Sara P Myers; Mohini Dasari; Joshua B Brown; Stephanie T Lumpkin; Matthew D Neal; Kaleab Z Abebe; Nicole Chaumont; Stephanie M Downs-Canner; Meghan R Flanagan; Kenneth K Lee; Matthew R Rosengart Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 14.766