| Literature DB >> 28284373 |
Joern Fischer1, David J Abson2, Arvid Bergsten2, Neil French Collier2, Ine Dorresteijn2, Jan Hanspach2, Kristoffer Hylander3, Jannik Schultner2, Feyera Senbeta4.
Abstract
Given the serious limitations of production-oriented frameworks, we offer here a new conceptual framework for how to analyze the nexus of food security and biodiversity conservation. We introduce four archetypes of social-ecological system states corresponding to win-win (e.g., agroecology), win-lose (e.g., intensive agriculture), lose-win (e.g., fortress conservation), and lose-lose (e.g., degraded landscapes) outcomes for food security and biodiversity conservation. Each archetype is shaped by characteristic external drivers, exhibits characteristic internal social-ecological features, and has characteristic feedbacks that maintain it. This framework shifts the emphasis from focusing on production only to considering social-ecological dynamics, and enables comparison among landscapes. Moreover, examining drivers and feedbacks facilitates the analysis of possible transitions between system states (e.g., from a lose-lose outcome to a more preferred outcome).Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28284373 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Ecol Evol ISSN: 0169-5347 Impact factor: 17.712