Bahiyah Abdullah1,2,3, Jimmy Nomura4, Shingo Moriyama4, Tingwen Huang4, Shino Tokiwa4, Mio Togo4. 1. Urogynaecology Unit, Kameda Medical Center, 929, Higashi-cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba Prefecture, 296-8602, Japan. bahiyah@salam.uitm.edu.my. 2. Maternofetal and Embryo (MatE) Research Group, Health and Wellbeing CoRe, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. bahiyah@salam.uitm.edu.my. 3. Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan Hospital, 47000, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia. bahiyah@salam.uitm.edu.my. 4. Urogynaecology Unit, Kameda Medical Center, 929, Higashi-cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba Prefecture, 296-8602, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that patient-reported urinary symptoms and urodynamic evaluation improve after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) despite deeper vesicovaginal space dissection. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent LSC from January 2013 to January 2016 in a tertiary center. Urinary function was clinically evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF), the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire- - Short Form 20 (PFDI-20). Urodynamic assessment was performed before and 6 months after surgery. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and the McNemar test were applied with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were included in the study. Of these, 46 had urodynamic assessment before and after LSC. There were significant improvements after LSC in urodynamic storage phase parameters (higher volume at first desire, higher volume at strong desire, and larger bladder capacity) and voiding phase parameters (higher Q max, higher Q ave, lower P det Q max, increased voided volume and reduced postvoid residual urine volume). Clinically, there was a significant increase after LSC in stress urinary incontinence and a significant reduction in urgency urinary incontinence, overactive bladder and voiding dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from increased stress urinary incontinence, there was an improvement in overall urinary function in terms of patient-reported symptoms and urodynamics, despite deep vesicovaginal space dissection. Hence, LSC is a viable surgical option for pelvic organ prolapse, restoring both level 1 and level 2 support without detrimental effects on urinary function.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that patient-reported urinary symptoms and urodynamic evaluation improve after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) despite deeper vesicovaginal space dissection. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent LSC from January 2013 to January 2016 in a tertiary center. Urinary function was clinically evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF), the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire- - Short Form 20 (PFDI-20). Urodynamic assessment was performed before and 6 months after surgery. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and the McNemar test were applied with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were included in the study. Of these, 46 had urodynamic assessment before and after LSC. There were significant improvements after LSC in urodynamic storage phase parameters (higher volume at first desire, higher volume at strong desire, and larger bladder capacity) and voiding phase parameters (higher Q max, higher Q ave, lower P det Q max, increased voided volume and reduced postvoid residual urine volume). Clinically, there was a significant increase after LSC in stress urinary incontinence and a significant reduction in urgency urinary incontinence, overactive bladder and voiding dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from increased stress urinary incontinence, there was an improvement in overall urinary function in terms of patient-reported symptoms and urodynamics, despite deep vesicovaginal space dissection. Hence, LSC is a viable surgical option for pelvic organ prolapse, restoring both level 1 and level 2 support without detrimental effects on urinary function.
Authors: Sophie G Fletcher; Rashel M Haverkorn; Jingsheng Yan; Joy J Lee; Philippe E Zimmern; Gary E Lemack Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: T A de Boer; S Salvatore; L Cardozo; C Chapple; C Kelleher; P van Kerrebroeck; M G Kirby; H Koelbl; M Espuna-Pons; I Milsom; A Tubaro; A Wagg; M E Vierhout Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Vincent Misraï; Morgan Rouprêt; Florence Cour; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; François Richard Journal: BJU Int Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Raymond T Foster; Matthew D Barber; Marie Fidela R Parasio; Mark D Walters; Alison C Weidner; Cindy L Amundsen Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Marijke C Ph Slieker-ten Hove; Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Curt W Burger; Mark E Vierhout Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2009-05-15