Literature DB >> 28283116

Bidirectional Exchanges of Medical Students Between Institutional Partners in Global Health Clinical Education Programs: Putting Ethical Principles into Practice.

Robert Rohrbaugh1, Anne Kellett2, Michael J Peluso3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One-third of US medical students participate in global health (GH) education, and approximately one-quarter of US medical schools have structured programs that offer special recognition in GH. GH clinical electives (GHCEs) are opportunities for students to experience a medical system and culture different from their own. GHCEs are administered through institutional affiliation agreements, often between an institution in a high-income country (HIC) and one in a low- or middle-income country (LMIC). Although these agreements suggest the exchange of students in both directions, GHCEs are traditionally characterized by students from HICs traveling to LMICs.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to investigate the availability of opportunities for students from LMICs participating in GHCEs at partner institutions in HICs and to describe the costs of these opportunities for students from LMICs.
METHODS: We conducted a web-based search of 30 US institutions previously identified as having structured programs in GH. We determined which of these schools have programs that accept medical students from international schools for GHCEs, as well as the administrative requirements, types of fees, and other costs to the international student based on information available on the web. Descriptive statistics were employed for the quantitative analysis of costs.
FINDINGS: We found that, although the majority of US institutions with structured GH programs sending students to sites abroad accept international students at their sites in the United States, nearly one-fifth of programs do not offer such opportunities for bidirectional exchange. We also characterized the substantial costs of such experiences, because this can represent a significant barrier for students from LMICs.
CONCLUSIONS: Access to GHCEs in US partner institutions should be an important underlying ethical principle in the establishment of institutional partnerships. The opportunities available to and experiences of students from LMIC partner institutions are important areas for future GH education research.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  bidirectional exchange; capacity building; ethics; global health clinical electives; global health education; inter-institutional partnerships

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28283116     DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.04.671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Glob Health        ISSN: 2214-9996            Impact factor:   2.462


  8 in total

1.  Reciprocity? International Preceptors' Perceptions of Global Health Elective Learners at African Sites.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Keating; Heather Haq; Chris A Rees; Padma Swamy; Teri L Turner; Stephanie Marton; Jill Sanders; Edith Q Mohapi; Peter N Kazembe; Gordon E Schutze
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.462

Review 2.  Global Health Education Programs in the Americas: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes; Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura; Artur Acelino Francisco Luz Nunes Queiroz; Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.462

3.  The international medical elective in Nepal: perspectives from local patients, host physicians and visiting students.

Authors:  Devon McMahon; Rajeev Shrestha; Biraj Karmacharya; Shrinkhala Shrestha; Rajendra Koju
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-22

4.  An International Partnership of 12 Anatomy Departments - Improving Global Health through Internationalization of Medical Education.

Authors:  Anette Wu; Geoffroy P J C Noël; Richard Wingate; Heike Kielstein; Takeshi Sakurai; Suvi Viranta-Kovanen; Chung-Liang Chien; Hannes Traxler; Jens Waschke; Franziska Vielmuth; Mandeep Gill Sagoo; Shuji Kitahara; Yojiro Kato; Kevin A Keay; Jørgen Olsen; Paulette Bernd
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.462

5.  Developing Ethical and Sustainable Global Health Educational Exchanges for Clinical Trainees: Implementation and Lessons Learned from the 30-Year Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership.

Authors:  Matthew Turissini; Tim Mercer; Jenny Baenziger; Lukoye Atwoli; Robert Einterz; Adrian Gardner; Debra Litzelman; Paul Ayuo
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.462

6.  Qualitative Analysis of the Host-Perceived Impact of Unidirectional Global Surgery Training in Kijabe, Kenya: Benefits, Challenges, and a Desire for Bidirectional Exchange.

Authors:  Catherine N Zivanov; James Joseph; Daniel E Pereira; Jana B A MacLeod; Rondi M Kauffmann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Socially Accountable Global Health Education Amidst Political Uncertainty and Reactionary Nationalism: A Value Proposition and Recommendations for Action.

Authors:  Michael J Peluso; Marilyn A DeLuca; Lorenzo Dagna; Bishan Garg; Janet P Hafler; Elsie Kiguli-Malwadde; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; Moira A Maley; Robert M Rohrbaugh
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.462

8.  Global health classroom: mixed methods evaluation of an interinstitutional model for reciprocal global health learning among Samoan and New Zealand medical students.

Authors:  Roshit K Bothara; Malama Tafuna'i; Tim J Wilkinson; Jen Desrosiers; Susan Jack; Philip K Pattemore; Tony Walls; Faafetai Sopoaga; David R Murdoch; Andrew P Miller
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.185

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.