Literature DB >> 28282952

A Frameshift Mutation in KIT is Associated with  White Spotting in the Arabian Camel.

Heather Holl1, Ramiro Isaza2, Yasmin Mohamoud3, Ayeda Ahmed3, Faisal Almathen4, Cherifi Youcef5, Semir Gaouar6, Douglas F Antczak7, Samantha Brooks8.   

Abstract

While the typical Arabian camel is characterized by a single colored coat, there are rare populations with white spotting patterns. White spotting coat patterns are found in virtually all domesticated species, but are rare in wild species. Theories suggest that white spotting is linked to the domestication process, and is occasionally associated with health disorders. Though mutations have been found in a diverse array of species, fewer than 30 genes have been associated with spotting patterns, thus providing a key set of candidate genes for the Arabian camel. We obtained 26 spotted camels and 24 solid controls for candidate gene analysis. One spotted and eight solid camels were whole genome sequenced as part of a separate project. The spotted camel was heterozygous for a frameshift deletion in KIT (c.1842delG, named KITW1 for White spotting 1), whereas all other camels were wild-type (KIT+/KIT+). No additional mutations unique to the spotted camel were detected in the EDNRB, EDN3, SOX10, KITLG, PDGFRA, MITF, and PAX3 candidate white spotting genes. Sanger sequencing of the study population identified an additional five kITW1/KIT+ spotted camels. The frameshift results in a premature stop codon five amino acids downstream, thus terminating KIT at the tyrosine kinase domain. An additional 13 spotted camels tested KIT+/KIT+, but due to phenotypic differences when compared to the KITW1/KIT+ camels, they likely represent an independent mutation. Our study suggests that there are at least two causes of white spotting in the Arabian camel, the newly described KITW1 allele and an uncharacterized mutation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabian camel;  KIT;  dromedary camel;  white spotting

Year:  2017        PMID: 28282952      PMCID: PMC5368706          DOI: 10.3390/genes8030102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4425            Impact factor:   4.096


1. Introduction

Coat color variation was valued throughout animal domestication [1]. Human selection favors unique morphological characteristics, resulting in the diverse array of coat pigmentation present in many species. Many genes are associated with white spotting patterns in domestic animals [2]. However, color variation is often associated with other behavioral or health traits, due to the phenomenon of genetic pleiotropy [3]. White spotting in particular is linked with conditions such as anemia, deafness, gastrointestinal abnormalities, skin cancers, and sterility [4]. However, while white spotting phenotypes are common among domesticated species, not all have known pleiotropy. The Arabian camel is an important domestic species selected for draught, meat, milk, racing, and riding. Though usually with a uniform coat of varying shades of brown or black, there are rare spotted or fully white populations [5,6,7,8]. To our knowledge, there have been no published studies on the genetics of camel coat color patterns. In this work, we report on a candidate gene approach using whole genome sequencing to characterize the genetics of white spotting.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Sample collection for this study was approved by the University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under protocol #201408506. All animals were voluntarily enrolled by private owners. Blood or hair samples were collected from 50 Arabian camels. Photographs were obtained for all but three animals, which were used to assess phenotype (Table 1). For the three animals without photos, phenotype was recorded as a written description at the time of sample collection. Individuals were identified as spotted if they exhibited a region of white fur with pink skin underneath on a background of normal pigmentation. Pedigree information was only available for five dam-offspring pairs (Table 1). Additionally, camels US12 and US15 as well as US14 and US17 were identified as possible half siblings, though the owner was not certain. DNA was extracted using either the Gentra Puregene buffy coat protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) or a modified Puregene protocol for hair [9].
Table 1

Origin and coat color information for the camels in this study.

IDOriginCoatEyesMarkingsGenotype
QA1QatarSolid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
QA2QatarSolid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
QA3QatarSolid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
QA4QatarSolid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
QA5QatarSolid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US1US Farm 1Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US3US Farm 1Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US4US Farm 2Spotted BrownBlueMottled white throughout body/neck/head, colored toplineKITW1/KIT+
US5US Farm 2Spotted BrownBlueMottled white on head and lower half of body, dark brown patch on rumpKITW1/KIT+
US6US Farm 3Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US12 1US Farm 4Spotted BrownBlueClear white legs/belly, mostly white faceKIT+/KIT+
US13US Farm 4Spotted BrownBlueClear white legs/belly, half white faceKIT+/KIT+
US14 2US Farm 4Spotted BrownDarkMottled white to knees/hocks, wide stripe on face, white tail tipKITW1/KIT+
US15 1US Farm 4Spotted BrownBlueClear white from legs to flanks, mostly white faceKIT+/KIT+
US16US Farm 4Spotted BrownBlueClear white to stifle/knee, clear white belly spot, white noseKIT+/KIT+
US17 2US Farm 4Spotted BrownDarkMottled white to knees/hocks, white spot on inner hindquarters, white tail tipKITW1/KIT+
US25US Farm 5Spotted BrownDarkWide stripe on face, white spot on withers, white toe, white tail tipKITW1/KIT+
US26 3US Farm 5Solid BrownBlueLight roaningKIT+/KIT+
US27 3US Farm 5Solid WhitePart-BlueNoneKIT+/KIT+
US28 4US Farm 5Spotted BrownBlueMottled white throughout body/neck/head, colored toplineKITW1/KIT+
US29 4US Farm 5Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US30US Farm 5Spotted BrownDarkWhite lips, light roaningKIT+/KIT+
US31US Farm 6Spotted BrownDarkWide stripe on faceKITW1/KIT+
US32US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US33US Farm 6Spotted BrownDarkWhite to elbows, white tail tipKITW1/KIT+
US34US Farm 6Spotted BrownBlueClear white to flank, half white faceKIT+/KIT+
US35US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US36US Farm 6Spotted BrownBlueClear white to flank, half white faceKIT+/KIT+
US37US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US38US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US39US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US40US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US41US Farm 6Solid WhiteDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US42 5US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US43 5US Farm 6Spotted BrownBlueClear white to knees, white noseKIT+/KIT+
US44 6US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US45 6US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US46 7US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US47 7US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
US48US Farm 6Spotted BrownDarkWhite stripe on face, white tailKITW1/KIT+
US49US Farm 6Spotted BrownDarkWhite tail tipKIT+/KIT+
US50US Farm 6Solid BrownDarkNoneKIT+/KIT+
SA1AlgeriaSpotted BrownBlueClear white belly to flank, white faceKIT+/KIT+
SA2AlgeriaSpotted BrownBlueWhite to knees, white faceKIT+/KIT+
SA3AlgeriaSpotted BrownBlueClear white to flanks, mostly white faceKIT+/KIT+
SA4AlgeriaSpotted BrownBlueClear white to flanks, mostly white faceKIT+/KIT+
SA5AlgeriaSpotted BrownBlueWhite to knees, half white faceKIT+/KIT+
SA6AlgeriaSpotted BlackBlueNo photo availableKIT+/KIT+
SA7AlgeriaSpotted BlackBlueNo photo availableKIT+/KIT+
SA8AlgeriaSpotted BlackBlueNo photo availableKIT+/KIT+

1 Possible half sibling pair; 2 Possible half sibling pair; 3 Dam (US26) offspring (US27) pair; 4 Dam (US28) offspring (US29) pair; 5 Dam (US42) offspring (US43) pair; 6 Dam (US44) offspring (US45) pair; 7 Dam (US46) offspring (US47) pair.

2.2. Next-Generation Sequencing

Whole genome sequencing was performed on eight camels (QA1-5, US1, US3-4, US6). Each sample was sequenced on a single lane of an Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 2 × 100 bp reads. We obtained an average of 184 million read pairs per lane. Raw sequencing reads were submitted to the ENA under accession number PRJEB15365. A custom reference sequence file was prepared, comprised of Arabian camel scaffolds matching known white spotting genes EDNRB, EDN3, SOX10, KIT, KITLG, PDGFRA, MITF, and PAX3 [10,11] (Supplementary Table S1). Sequencing reads were aligned with BWA 0.7.12-r1039 using default parameters, and were converted to BAM format using SAMtools 0.1.19-44428cd [12,13]. Predicted dromedary camel mRNA sequences for the candidate genes were obtained from Genbank and aligned to the custom reference using BLAT 20140318 [14] (Supplementary Table S1). Alignments were visualized in IGV 2.3.55 [15]. The coding regions and immediately surrounding introns were manually inspected for variant annotation (Supplementary Table S2). At least three reads for homozygous variants and six for heterozygous variants were required to record a genotype.

2.3. Variant Validation and Genotyping

Variants observed only in the spotted camel genome were selected for further evaluation. PCR primers were designed using the reference scaffolds and Primer3 [16] (Supplementary Table S3). Additional samples were genotyped by Sanger sequencing of PCR amplicons. Chromatograms in PDF format were visually inspected to assess genotype. Sanger sequences for camel KIT exons 12 and 13 were submitted to Genbank and are available under accession numbers KX784929 (KIT) and KX784928 (KIT).

3. Results and Discussion

The degree of white spotting of each animal varied greatly, ranging from white only on the lips, to white on approximately 80% of the body (Table 1, Figure 1). Camels with extensive markings had blue eyes. Samples US27 and US41 were recorded as solid white as there were no obvious colored patches of fur. “Mottled white” indicates that the border between the colored and white fur was jagged and uneven, and/or with regions where colored and white fur were intermingled (Figure 1C). “Clear white” indicates a well-defined border between colored and white fur, though with possible flecks of color within predominantly white patches (Figure 1D). Minimally spotted camels often had white restricted to the “points”—the face, legs, and tail. The US spotted camels were visibly smaller in overall body size than the solid camels, though no quantitative measures were assessed. Two of the owners mentioned that spotted camels are known for being roughly 30 cm shorter at maturity.
Figure 1

Range of white spotting phenotypes in this study. (A) A minimally spotted camel (US30), displaying white patches on both upper lips. (B) A minimally spotted camel (US25), showing a facial marking and white spot in front of the hump. (C) An extensively spotted “mottled white” camel (US28), with pigmented regions concentrated along the topline. (D) A moderately spotted “clear white” camel (US34), showing clear definition between pigmented and white regions.

Most US owners did not have information on the colors of the parents of the spotted camels. One owner described that many of the breeders he knew of bred white spotted bulls to non-spotted cows in order to produce color. He knew of one spotted bull (~50% of the body with white spotting) that produced all minimally spotted offspring (dark eyes with white on the face, legs, and/or tail) out of solid cows. However, the mottled white phenotype is not likely to be incompletely dominant, as one of the extensively marked camels in the study (US28) produced a completely non-spotted calf (US29). We thus assumed the mottled white trait would be dominant based on similarities to white spotting patterns in the horse. The spotted Algerian camels, known locally as Azerghaf or Zarwala, are found in the southwest regions of the country. Some tribes prefer the spotted camels as they are born deaf, and thus are easier to raise. Interviews with local farmers indicate the color is likely autosomal recessive in inheritance. A secondary type of spotted Algerian camel (characterized by a white spot on the forehead, found in the extreme south) was not available for genotyping. Variant screening identified one mutation in KIT as a likely candidate (Supplementary Table S2). There were no variants detected in PAX3, whereas candidate genes SOX10, MITF, and KITLG only had variants in the untranslated regions (only one of which was uniquely present in spotted camel US4). Silent variants in KIT, EDN3, EDNRB, and PDGFRA were found in both US4 and non-spotted camels (QA1-5, US1, US3, US6). There was one homozygous missense variant in PDGFRA present in US4, but it was not considered further as QA4 was heterozygous for this variant as well. The only coding variant unique to US4 was a heterozygous single base deletion within exon 12 of 21 in KIT (c.1842delG). This mutation results in a frameshift, leading to a premature stop codon five amino acids downstream (p.M614IfsX5). This mutation ultimately truncates the protein at the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. Sanger sequencing identified eight additional heterozygotes and no homozygous mutants (Figure 2, Table 2). Five heterozygotes were in the mottled white category, whereas the remaining four animals had too little white to define as clear or mottled (Table 1). Based on the appearance of the minimally spotted camels, we have termed the allele KIT for White spotting 1.
Figure 2

Sanger sequencing confirms the presence of a heterozygous deletion. The KIT:c.1842delG variant results in a frameshift five bases downstream, truncating the protein at the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain.

Table 2

Genotyping results for the KIT:c.1842delG mutation (KIT).

PhenotypeWT/WTWT/deldel/delTotal
Solid Brown220022
Solid White2002
Clear White100010
Mottled White0505
Other Spotted74011
Total419050
KIT, v-kit Hardy-Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, is one of the most commonly implicated genes for white spotting phenotypes in animals [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. There are four reported frameshift mutations in the domestic horse, all of which were associated with extensive white spotting [17,25,26]. KIT encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor involved in the development of erthyrocytes, melanocytes, germ cells, mast cells, and interstitial cells of Cajal [27]. As a result, loss-of-function mutations have been associated with a variety of negative pleiotropic effects, and in some cases are hypothesized to be homozygous lethal [20,28,29]. However, not all KIT variants have reported pleiotropy, and specific variants in cats and horses were shown to have normal hematological parameters [18,30]. All nine camels with the KIT:c.1842delG variant were mature without obvious health issues, although detailed histories were not available. Additionally, one of the animals had two previous successful pregnancies, and thus was fertile. The KIT allele does not appear to be detrimental in heterozygotes, although homozygous embryos are likely not viable, similar to dogs with a frameshift mutation in KIT [20]. The appearance of the nine KIT camels was highly variable. Minimally spotted animals (white on face, legs, or tail only) had dark eyes, whereas the more extensively marked camels had blue eyes (Table 1). Blue eyes are commonly associated with white markings in a variety of species. Several of the equine KIT variants also show considerable variation in the degree of spotting, including horses with white found only on the head and legs [25,31,32]. Intense selection for the degree of white spotting in the mouse has demonstrated that a large number of additive and modifying loci cumulatively contribute to overall color, in addition to non-genetic factors [33]. Heterozygous KIT mice display the full range of color, from completely solid to completely white. It is thus likely that the more extensively marked mottled white camels possessed additional genetic variants that we did not detect. As the remaining spotted camels were wild-type for KIT:c.1842delG, they likely have a different mutation responsible for white spotting. The overall appearance of the moderately marked animals was quite distinct between the “mottled white” and “clear white” patterns, with the “clear white” animals appearing similar to the “splashed white” coat color of the horse [34]. Interestingly, both the Algerian spotted camels and some splashed white horses have a congenital deafness. Splashed white is associated with mutations in MITF and PAX3, both of which are genes implicated in the human Waardenburg Syndrome (characterized by white patches of skin, blue eyes, and some degree of deafness). Thus, MITF and PAX3 are attractive candidates for the “clear white” Arabian camel phenotype.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the c.1842delG mutation in KIT is likely responsible for one form of white spotting in the dromedary camel. We propose to name this allele KIT for White spotting 1. However, due to the wide variation in KIT/KIT animals, and the presence of KIT/KIT spotted camels, there are likely other mutations that we did not characterize. Further research should elucidate the genes responsible for other white phenotypes.
  29 in total

1.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.

Authors:  S Rozen; H Skaletsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool.

Authors:  W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Studies on Spotting Patterns II. Genetic Analysis of Variegated Spotting in the House Mouse.

Authors:  L C Dunn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1937-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Kit as a human oncogenic tyrosine kinase.

Authors:  Y Kitamura; S Hirotab
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha-subunit gene (Pdgfra) is deleted in the mouse patch (Ph) mutation.

Authors:  D A Stephenson; M Mercola; E Anderson; C Y Wang; C D Stiles; D F Bowen-Pope; V M Chapman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Seven novel KIT mutations in horses with white coat colour phenotypes.

Authors:  B Haase; S A Brooks; T Tozaki; D Burger; P-A Poncet; S Rieder; T Hasegawa; C Penedo; T Leeb
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Coat color variation at the beginning of horse domestication.

Authors:  Arne Ludwig; Melanie Pruvost; Monika Reissmann; Norbert Benecke; Gudrun A Brockmann; Pedro Castaños; Michael Cieslak; Sebastian Lippold; Laura Llorente; Anna-Sapfo Malaspinas; Montgomery Slatkin; Michael Hofreiter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Haematological parameters are normal in dominant white Franches-Montagnes horses carrying a KIT mutation.

Authors:  Bianca Haase; Gabriela Obexer-Ruff; Gaudenz Dolf; Stefan Rieder; Dominik Burger; Pierre-André Poncet; Vincent Gerber; Judith Howard; Tosso Leeb
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.688

9.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): mouse biology and model systems.

Authors:  Carol J Bult; Janan T Eppig; James A Kadin; Joel E Richardson; Judith A Blake
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identification of Candidate Genes for Pigmentation in Camels Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing.

Authors:  Morteza Bitaraf Sani; Javad Zare Harofte; Mohammad Hossein Banabazi; Asim Faraz; Saeid Esmaeilkhanian; Ali Shafei Naderi; Nader Salim; Abbas Teimoori; Ahmad Bitaraf; Mohammad Zadehrahmani; Pamela Anna Burger; Nader Asadzadeh; Mohammad Silawi; Afsaneh Taghipour Sheshdeh; Behrouz Mohammad Nazari; Mohammad Ali Faghihi; Zahra Roudbari
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  On-Target CRISPR/Cas9 Activity Can Cause Undesigned Large Deletion in Mouse Zygotes.

Authors:  Alexey Korablev; Varvara Lukyanchikova; Irina Serova; Nariman Battulin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Quality and quantity of dromedary camel DNA sampled from whole-blood, saliva, and tail-hair.

Authors:  Hasan Alhaddad; Tasneem Maraqa; Suha Alabdulghafour; Huda Alaskar; Randa Alaqeely; Faisal Almathen; Bader H Alhajeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.