Literature DB >> 28282690

Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score.

Antonio Z Gimeno-García, Jose Luis Baute, Goretti Hernandez, Dalia Morales, Carmen Delia Gonzalez-Pérez, David Nicolás-Pérez, Onofre Alarcon-Fernández, Alejandro Jiménez, Manuel Hernandez-Guerra, Rafael Romero, Inmaculada Alonso, Yanira Gonzalez, Zaida Adrian, Marta Carrillo, Laura Ramos, Enrique Quintero.   

Abstract

Background and study aim Inadequate bowel cleansing negatively affects the efficiency of colonoscopy in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to design and validate a predictive model for inadequate bowel cleanliness. Patients and methods The model was built from 667 consecutive outpatients (development cohort) who were prospectively scheduled for colonoscopy between June and September 2014. The validation cohort included 409 outpatients who underwent colonoscopy between October and December 2014. Cleansing was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Bowel preparation was administered on the same day as the examination. Results In the development cohort, BBPS was adequate in 541 patients (81.1 %). At multivariate analysis, antidepressants (odds ratio [OR] 4.25, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.91 - 9.47), co-morbidity (OR 3.35, 95 %CI 2.16 - 5.18), constipation (OR 2.09, 95 %CI 1.29 - 3.40), and abdominal/pelvic surgery (OR 1.60, 95 %CI 1.03 - 2.47) were independent predictors for inadequate cleansing. The model built with these variables showed an area under the curve of 0.72 in the development cohort and 0.70 in the validation cohort. A cutoff of 1.225 predicted inadequate bowel preparation with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.3 % (95 %CI 51.6 - 68.4), 75.4 % (95 %CI 71.6 - 78.9), 36.4 % (95 %CI 30.1 - 43.1), and 89.1 % (95 %CI 85.9 - 91.6) in the development cohort, and 50.0 % (95 %CI 38.1 - 61.9), 80.0 % (95 %CI 75.3 - 84.2), 35.7 % (95 %CI 26.4 - 45.6), and 87.9 % (95 %CI 83.7 - 91.3) in the validation cohort. Conclusion A simple score may assist the clinician in predicting which patients are at high risk of inadequate bowel cleanliness. This may guide changes in bowel preparation strategy accordingly. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28282690     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-101683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  17 in total

Review 1.  Which Patient-Related Factors Determine Optimal Bowel Preparation?

Authors:  Myriam Martel; Charles Ménard; Sophie Restellini; Omar Kherad; Majid Almadi; Maïté Bouchard; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

2.  Risk Factors Associated with Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Patients with Functional Constipation.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Guo; Xin Shi; Xiaoyu Kang; Hui Luo; Xiangping Wang; Hui Jia; Qin Tao; Jingjie Wang; Mingxin Zhang; Jinhai Wang; Xiaolan Lu; Shiyang Ma; Tao Lin; Yujie Jing; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Kang; Lina Zhao; Zhiyong Zhu; Felix Leung; Limei Wang; Xiangping Wang; Hui Luo; Linhui Zhang; Tao Dong; Pingying Li; Zhangqin Chen; Gui Ren; Hui Jia; Xiaoyang Guo; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  External validation of two prediction models for adequate bowel preparation in Asia: a prospective study.

Authors:  Xin Yuan; Hui Gao; Cenqin Liu; Weihong Wang; Jiarong Xie; Zhixin Zhang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Predictive factors of inadequate bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy.

Authors:  Amir Sadeghi; Mohsen Rajabnia; Mohammad Bagheri; Shaghayegh Jamshidizadeh; Samane Saberi; Paria Shahnazi; Leila Pasharavesh; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Mona Mirzaei; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2022

Review 6.  Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Milou L M van Riswijk; Kelly E van Keulen; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.337

7.  Comparison of the effect of 1-day and 2-day low residue diets on the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Li Jiao; Junmin Wang; Wenjuan Zhao; Xinying Zhu; Xia Meng; Liwei Zhao
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

8.  Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type.

Authors:  Isabel Portillo; Isabel Idigoras; Isabel Bilbao; Eunate Arana-Arri; María José Fernández-Landa; Jose Luis Hurtado; Cristina Sarasaqueta; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-09-11

9.  Factors Affecting Proximal Colon Cleansing Based on Bowel Movement Kinetics: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Dae Bum Kim; Kang-Moon Lee; Sung-Goo Kang; Sung Hoon Jung
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients.

Authors:  Fadi Abu Baker; Amir Mari; Smadar Nafrin; Muhammed Suki; Baruch Ovadia; Oren Gal; Yael Kopelamn
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.