Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize the inflammatory response and determine a no-observable effect level (NOEL) in rabbit eyes after endotoxin intravitreal (ITV) injection. Methods: Fifty-three naïve male Dutch Belted rabbits were treated with a single 50-μL ITV injection ranging from 0.01 to 0.75 endotoxin units/eye (EU/eye) and monitored for up to 42 days post treatment. Ophthalmic examination included slit-lamp biomicroscopy and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Laser flare photometry was performed in a subset of animals. On days 2, 8, 16, and 43, a subset of animals was necropsied and eyes processed for histopathological evaluation. Results: Intravitreal injection of endotoxin at ≥0.05 EU/eye resulted in a dose-related anterior segment inflammation response. No aqueous flare or cell response was noted in the 0.01 EU/eye dose group. A more delayed posterior segment response characterized by vitreal cell response was observed beginning on day 5, peaking on day 9, and decreasing starting on day 16 that persisted at trace to a level of 1+ on day 43. Microscopy findings of infiltrates of minimal mixed inflammatory cells in the vitreous and subconjunctiva and proteinaceous fluid in the anterior chamber and/or vitreous were observed in eyes given ≥0.1 EU/eye. Conclusions: We defined the NOEL for ITV endotoxin to be 0.01 EU/eye, suggesting that the vitreal cavity is more sensitive to the effects of endotoxin than the anterior segment and aqueous chamber. These data highlight the importance of assessing endotoxin level in intravitreal formulations, as levels as low as 0.05 EU/eye may confound the safety evaluations of intravitreal therapeutics in rabbits.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize the inflammatory response and determine a no-observable effect level (NOEL) in rabbit eyes after endotoxin intravitreal (ITV) injection. Methods: Fifty-three naïve male Dutch Belted rabbits were treated with a single 50-μL ITV injection ranging from 0.01 to 0.75 endotoxin units/eye (EU/eye) and monitored for up to 42 days post treatment. Ophthalmic examination included slit-lamp biomicroscopy and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Laser flare photometry was performed in a subset of animals. On days 2, 8, 16, and 43, a subset of animals was necropsied and eyes processed for histopathological evaluation. Results: Intravitreal injection of endotoxin at ≥0.05 EU/eye resulted in a dose-related anterior segment inflammation response. No aqueous flare or cell response was noted in the 0.01 EU/eye dose group. A more delayed posterior segment response characterized by vitreal cell response was observed beginning on day 5, peaking on day 9, and decreasing starting on day 16 that persisted at trace to a level of 1+ on day 43. Microscopy findings of infiltrates of minimal mixed inflammatory cells in the vitreous and subconjunctiva and proteinaceous fluid in the anterior chamber and/or vitreous were observed in eyes given ≥0.1 EU/eye. Conclusions: We defined the NOEL for ITV endotoxin to be 0.01 EU/eye, suggesting that the vitreal cavity is more sensitive to the effects of endotoxin than the anterior segment and aqueous chamber. These data highlight the importance of assessing endotoxin level in intravitreal formulations, as levels as low as 0.05 EU/eye may confound the safety evaluations of intravitreal therapeutics in rabbits.
Authors: Vladimir Bantseev; Paul E Miller; T Michael Nork; Carol A Rasmussen; Aija McKenzie; Brian J Christian; Helen Booler; Evan A Thackaberry Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 2.671
Authors: Ignacio Melgar-Asensio; Irawati Kandela; Fraser Aird; Soesiawati R Darjatmoko; Cristobal de Los Rios; Christine M Sorenson; Daniel M Albert; Nader Sheibani; Jack Henkin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Tatiana M Corey; Vernard V Woodley; Merissa O'Connor; Emma Connolly; Sarah Doyle; Stephanie Shrader; Cyrene Phipps; Kimicia Isaac; Matthew Lawrence Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 3.048
Authors: R Ganugula; M Arora; M A Lepiz; Y Niu; B K Mallick; S C Pflugfelder; E M Scott; M N V Ravi Kumar Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 14.136