| Literature DB >> 28282413 |
Premanand Chandran1, Harsha L Rao1, Anil K Mandal1, Nikhil S Choudhari1, Chandra S Garudadri1, Sirisha Senthil1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the demographic profile, clinical features, and prevalence of glaucoma and its management in patients with Iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28282413 PMCID: PMC5345787 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171884
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of patients with ICE syndrome.
| Characteristic | Entire patient population | PIA (115 eyes) | CS (87 eyes) | CRS (21 eyes) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Median, Q1Q3) | 43 (34, 51) | 42 (33, 50) | 45 (35, 54) | 48 (36, 50) | 0.06 |
| VA (Median, Q1Q3) | 20/80 (20/30, CF 1m) | 20/40 (20/20, 20/400) | CF 1m (20/60, CF 1m) | 20/80 (20/20, 20/400) | 0.001 |
| IOP (Median, Q1Q3) | 18 (14, 32) | 20 (14, 38) | 18 (15, 34) | 26.5 (18, 35) | 0.007 |
PIA, indicates progressive iris atrophy; CS, Chandler syndrome; CRS, Cogan Reese syndrome; VA, visual acuity; Q1, 1stquartile; Q3, 3rd quartile; IOP, intraocular pressure; CF 1m, counting fingers at 1 meter.
* p value derived from Kruskal Wallis test.
Comparison of clinical features of the 3 subtypes of ICE syndrome.
| PIA | CS | CRS | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (115 eyes) | (87 eyes) | (21 eyes) | ||
| No. (%) of eyes | 34 (29) | 82 (93) | 8 (40) | <0.001 |
| (No. (%) of eyes) | ||||
| Corectopia | 115 (100) | 74(85) | 21 (100) | <0.001 |
| Polycoria | 115 (100) | 0 | 14 (67) | |
| Iris nodules | 0 | 0 | 21 (100) | |
| No. (%) of eyes | 88 (76) | 58 (67) | 17 (81) | 0.21 |
PIA, indicates progressive iris atrophy; CS, Chandler syndrome; CRS, Cogan Reese syndrome.
Fig 1Clinical photograph showing the 3 variants of ICE syndrome.
(a) Eye with progressive iris atrophy after AGV implantation, (a1) shows the same eye after DSEK and intraocular lens implantation. (b) Eye with Cogan-Reese syndrome, (b1) same eye after trabeculectomy with MMC. (c) Eye with Chandler syndrome, (c1) same eye after trabeculectomy with MMC and DSEK.
Comparison of ICE syndrome between present series and other series in Southeast Asian and Caucasian patients.
| Parameter | Present series (Indian) | Teekhasaenee and Ritch (Southeast Asian) | Shields et al (Caucasian) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 223 (203) | 60 (60) | 82 (82) | |
| 43 (34, 51) | 43.7 ± 12.3 | 38.6 (6–58) | |
| 61 | 66.7 | 68.3 | |
| PIA (52.4%) > CS > CRS | CRS (63.3%) > CS > PIA | CS, PIA > CRS | |
| 124 (55.7%) | 25 (41.7%) | 41 (50) | |
| Corectopia | 210 (94.1%) | 59 (98.3%) | 58 (70.7%) |
| Polycoria | 129 (57.8%) | 13 (21.6%) | 20 (24.3%) |
| Ectropion uvea | NA | 42 (70%) | 23 (28%) |
| 156 (69.9%) | 46 (76.7%) | 63 (76.8%) | |
PIA, indicates progressive iris atrophy; CS, Chandler syndrome; CRS, Cogan Reese syndrome;
a, median (1st and 3rd quartile);
b, mean ± standard deviation;
c, mean (range);
d, in unilateral cases;
e, eyes were not divided into CS and PIA.