Literature DB >> 28281781

Feedlot- and Pen-Level Prevalence of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in Feces of Commercial Feedlot Cattle in Two Major U.S. Cattle Feeding Areas.

Charley A Cull1, David G Renter1, Diana M Dewsbury1, Lance W Noll1, Pragathi B Shridhar1, Samuel E Ives2, Tiruvoor G Nagaraja1, Natalia Cernicchiaro1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine feedlot- and pen-level fecal prevalence of seven enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) belonging to serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157, or EHEC-7) in feces of feedlot cattle in two feeding areas in the United States. Cattle pens from four commercial feedlots in each of the two major U.S. beef cattle areas were sampled. Up to 16 pen-floor fecal samples were collected from each of 4-6 pens per feedlot, monthly, for a total of three visits per feedlot, from June to August, 2014. Culture procedures including fecal enrichment in E. coli broth, immunomagnetic separation, and plating on selective media, followed by confirmation through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, were conducted. Generalized linear mixed models were fitted to estimate feedlot-, pen-, and sample-level fecal prevalence of EHEC-7 and to evaluate associations between potential demographic and management risk factors with feedlot and within-pen prevalence of EHEC-7. All study feedlots and 31.0% of the study pens had at least one non-O157 EHEC-positive fecal sample, whereas 62.4% of pens tested positive for EHEC O157; sample-level prevalence estimates ranged from 0.0% for EHEC O121 to 18.7% for EHEC O157. Within-pen prevalence of EHEC O157 varied significantly by sampling month; similarly within-pen prevalence of non-O157 EHEC varied significantly by month and by the sex composition of the pen (heifer, steer, or mixed). Feedlot management factors, however, were not significantly associated with fecal prevalence of EHEC-7. Intraclass correlation coefficients for EHEC-7 models indicated that most of the variation occurred between pens, rather than within pens, or between feedlots. Hence, the potential combination of preharvest interventions and pen-level management strategies may have positive food safety impacts downstream along the beef chain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EHEC; cattle; enterohemorrhagic E. coli; food safety; preharvest; prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281781     DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2016.2227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis        ISSN: 1535-3141            Impact factor:   3.171


  8 in total

1.  Population Dynamics of Salmonella enterica within Beef Cattle Cohorts Followed from Single-Dose Metaphylactic Antibiotic Treatment until Slaughter.

Authors:  Gizem Levent; Ashlynn Schlochtermeier; Samuel E Ives; Keri N Norman; Sara D Lawhon; Guy H Loneragan; Robin C Anderson; Javier Vinasco; H Morgan Scott
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Prevalence and Epidemiology of Non-O157 Escherichia coli Serogroups O26, O103, O111, and O145 and Shiga Toxin Gene Carriage in Scottish Cattle, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Deborah V Hoyle; Marianne Keith; Helen Williamson; Kareen Macleod; Heather Mathie; Ian Handel; Carol Currie; Anne Holmes; Lesley Allison; Rebecca McLean; Rebecca Callaby; Thibaud Porphyre; Sue C Tongue; Madeleine K Henry; Judith Evans; George J Gunn; David L Gally; Nuno Silva; Margo E Chase-Topping
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Shiga Toxin Subtypes of Non-O157 Escherichia coli Serogroups Isolated from Cattle Feces.

Authors:  Pragathi B Shridhar; Chris Siepker; Lance W Noll; Xiaorong Shi; T G Nagaraja; Jianfa Bai
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.293

4.  Analysis of virulence potential of Escherichia coli O145 isolated from cattle feces and hide samples based on whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Pragathi B Shridhar; Jay N Worley; Xin Gao; Xun Yang; Lance W Noll; Xiaorong Shi; Jianfa Bai; Jianghong Meng; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of Cattle for Naturally Colonized Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Requires Combinatorial Strategies.

Authors:  Indira T Kudva; Eben R Oosthuysen; Bryan Wheeler; Clint A Loest
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  Identification, Shiga toxin subtypes and prevalence of minor serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in feedlot cattle feces.

Authors:  Kaylen M Capps; Justin B Ludwig; Pragathi B Shridhar; Xiaorong Shi; Elisabeth Roberts; Chitrita DebRoy; Natalia Cernicchiaro; Randall K Phebus; Jianfa Bai; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparative genomics reveals differences in mobile virulence genes of Escherichia coli O103 pathotypes of bovine fecal origin.

Authors:  Lance W Noll; Jay N Worley; Xun Yang; Pragathi B Shridhar; Justin B Ludwig; Xiaorong Shi; Jianfa Bai; Doina Caragea; Jianghong Meng; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Multiplex PCR Assays for the Detection of One Hundred and Thirty Seven Serogroups of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Associated With Cattle.

Authors:  Justin B Ludwig; Xiaorong Shi; Pragathi B Shridhar; Elisabeth L Roberts; Chitrita DebRoy; Randy K Phebus; Jianfa Bai; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.