| Literature DB >> 28281565 |
Haitao Wang1,2, Christopher W Marshall3,4, Minying Cheng5, Huijuan Xu2, Hu Li2, Xiaoru Yang2, Tianling Zheng1.
Abstract
Transition of populations from rurEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28281565 PMCID: PMC5345093 DOI: 10.1038/srep44049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Information and statistic data of each sampling site.
| Site | Coordinate (N) | Coordinate (E) | District | Sub-district | Density(103km−2) | Land cover | Category | Abbreviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Area (km2) | Population(103) | ||||||||
| Bailuzhou Park | 24.47746 | 118.08905 | Siming | Yuandang | 9.5 | 225 | 23.68 | turfgrass | urban | Urb1 |
| Zhongshan Park | 24.46098 | 118.08515 | Siming | Kaiyuan | 5.7 | 85 | 21.37 | turfgrass | urban | Urb2 |
| Botany Garden | 24.45525 | 118.09002 | Siming | Kaiyuan | 5.7 | 85 | 21.37 | turfgrass | urban | Urb3 |
| Jinbang Park | 24.46629 | 118.10471 | Siming | Wucun | 6.2 | 129 | 20.74 | turfgrass | urban | Urb4 |
| Meihailing Park | 24.45295 | 118.12298 | Siming | Wucun | 6.2 | 129 | 20.74 | turfgrass | urban | Urb5 |
| Buzheng Park | 24.48126 | 118.12530 | Siming | Jialian | 4.5 | 125 | 27.90 | turfgrass | urban | Urb6 |
| Zhonglun Park | 24.48710 | 118.14848 | Huli | Jiangtou | 10.4 | 223 | 23.68 | turfgrass | urban | Urb7 |
| Jiangtou Park | 24.49740 | 118.12496 | Huli | Jiangtou | 10.4 | 223 | 23.68 | turfgrass | urban | Urb8 |
| Lehai Park | 24.57917 | 118.10732 | Jimei | Jimei | 3.6 | 43 | 11.94 | turfgrass | suburban | Sub1 |
| Jingxian Park | 24.57744 | 118.09997 | Jimei | Jimei | 3.6 | 43 | 11.94 | turfgrass | suburban | Sub2 |
| Ridong Park | 24.56477 | 118.03159 | Jimei | Xingbin | 21.6 | 190 | 8.80 | turfgrass | suburban | Sub3 |
| Xingdong Park | 24.56504 | 118.04491 | Jimei | Xinglin | 24.7 | 122 | 4.93 | turfgrass | suburban | Sub4 |
| Houxi Vegetable Field | 24.64128 | 118.03666 | Jimei | Houxi | 44.1 | 59 | 1.33 | vegetable | rural | Rur1 |
| Houxi Paddy Soil | 24.64119 | 118.03547 | Jimei | Houxi | 44.1 | 59 | 1.33 | rice | rural | Rur2 |
The population is the permanent residential population.
Figure 1Soil chemical properties in urban (blue), suburban (green) and rural (red) categories.
Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 32, n = 16 and n = 8 for urban, suburban and rural, respectively), and differences are significant when no same letter above the bars exists (p < 0.05). ND, not detected.
Figure 2PDA (a), potential N2O emission (b), N2O/(N2O + N2) (c) and PNR (d) in urban (blue), suburban (green) and rural (red) categories. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 32, n = 16 and n = 8 for urban, suburban and rural, respectively), and differences are significant when the letter above the bars are different (p < 0.05). PDA, potential denitrification activity; PNR, potential nitrification rate; N2O/(N2O + N2), potential N2O emission/PDA, the proportion of N2O emission to the total gas emission in denitrification.
Kruskal-Wallis H test for the effect of urbanization on the potential microbial activities and gene abundances.
| Chi square | Significance | Significant level | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Potential N2O emission | 13.35 | 0.001 | *** |
| PDA | 15.35 | <0.001 | *** |
| N2O/(N2O + N2) | 3.98 | 0.137 | NS |
| PNR | 12.50 | 0.002 | ** |
| Bacterial 16 S abun. | 16.17 | <0.001 | *** |
| Archaeal 16 S abun. | 15.07 | 0.001 | *** |
| AOA | 28.74 | <0.001 | *** |
| AOB | 19.60 | <0.001 | *** |
| AOA/AOB | 23.73 | <0.001 | *** |
| 13.35 | <0.001 | *** | |
| 25.57 | <0.001 | *** | |
| 20.42 | <0.001 | *** | |
| 20.39 | <0.001 | *** | |
| 10.86 | 0.004 | ** | |
| 6.23 | 0.044 | * | |
| 13.54 | 0.001 | *** | |
| AOA | 25.73 | <0.001 | *** |
| AOB | 10.45 | <0.001 | *** |
| 4.05 | 0.132 | NS | |
| 17.83 | <0.001 | *** | |
| 16.88 | <0.001 | *** | |
| 0.48 | 0.788 | NS |
Urbanization refers to three categories (urban, suburban, and rural) defined by population densities. NS, not significant. abun., abundance. R. abun., relative abundance. *, significance level at 0.05; **, significance level at 0.01; ***, significance level at 0.001.
Absolute abundances (copies g−1 dry weight soil), ratios and relative abundances of genes involved in nitrification and denitrification in soils with different categories.
| Urban turfgrass | Suburban turfgrass | Rural farmland | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archaeal 16 S rRNA (109) | 0.50 ± 0.05b | 0.66 ± 0.25ab | 1.29 ± 0.14a |
| Bacterial 16 S rRNA (1010) | 1.34 ± 0.13b | 1.30 ± 0.24b | 3.37 ± 0.34a |
| AOA (108) | 1.86 ± 0.22a | 0.28 ± 0.09b | 0.41 ± 0.04b |
| AOB (107) | 0.30 ± 0.06b | 0.89 ± 0.04b | 3.10 ± 0.83a |
| 1.91 ± 0.19b | 1.98 ± 0.40b | 4.06 ± 0.37a | |
| 0.22 ± 0.04b | 0.55 ± 0.13b | 2.16 ± 0.27a | |
| 0.26 ± 0.03b | 0.36 ± 0.07b | 1.16 ± 0.08a | |
| 1.06 ± 0.20ab | 0.59 ± 0.13b | 1.76 ± 0.24a | |
| AOA/AOB | 135.64 ± 26.41a | 58.73 ± 19.97ab | 2.08 ± 0.53b |
| 1.92 ± 0.31a | 1.11 ± 0.43ab | 0.20 ± 0.02b | |
| 0.45 ± 0.05b | 1.11 ± 0.25a | 0.73 ± 0.09a | |
| 4.80 ± 0.74b | 9.71 ± 1.62a | 9.62 ± 1.37a | |
| AOA/16 S** | 0.45 ± 0.05a | 0.36 ± 0.24ab | 0.03 ± 0.01b |
| AOB/16 S (10−4) | 2.19 ± 0.32b | 3.79 ± 1.66ab | 9.46 ± 2.28a |
| 1.51 ± 0.11a | 1.46 ± 0.06a | 1.37 ± 0.30a | |
| 1.75 ± 0.36b | 6.80 ± 1.55a | 7.07 ± 1.06a | |
| 1.97 ± 0.12b | 3.49 ± 0.58a | 3.73 ± 0.47a | |
| 7.97 ± 1.32a | 5.80 ± 1.01a | 5.82 ± 1.22a |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation (n = 32, 16, 8 for Urban, Suburban and rural, respectively). *nir/nos, (nirK + nirS)/(nosZ I + nosZ II). **16 S, archaeal 16 S rRNA for AOA and bacterial 16 S rRNA for the others. Differences are significant when no same letter exists between categories (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Heatmap showing average relative abundances of microbial communities at phylum level.
The clustering of taxa is based on the Pearson’s correlation.
Figure 4(a) Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) based on the relative abundance of each OTU. 16 significant soil properties and 2 urban data were selected as the environmental variables. The quantitative variables are represented by arrows and the categorical variable, land use (“Turfgrass” and “Farmland”), is shown as unfilled diamonds. (b) Variation partitioning analysis for the explanatory proportions of different sets of factors. The land use was transformed to dummy variables for this analysis (turfgrass, 1; farmland, 0).
Figure 5Non-strict version of LEfSe results on microbial communities.
The cladogram indicates the taxa (highlighted with small circles and shading) showing different abundance values (according to LEfSe) in the urban, suburban, and rural agricultural soils. For each taxon (circle), the color denotes the significantly higher abundance of the taxon in the corresponding group. Yellow denotes that the taxon is not significantly higher in any group.