Literature DB >> 28281278

Retrospective comparison of perinatal outcomes following emergency cervical cerclage with or without prolapsed membranes.

Patricia Steenhaut1, Corinne Hubinont1, Pierre Bernard1, Frédéric Debiève1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal outcomes following emergency cerclage between patients with singleton pregnancies with prolapsed and non-prolapsed membranes.
METHODS: The present retrospective cohort study included data from women who underwent physical examination-indicated emergency cerclage at between 15 and 25 weeks of pregnancy at Saint Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium, between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014. Outcomes were compared based on the presence of prolapsed or non-prolapsed membranes. The primary outcome measures were the duration of pregnancy at delivery and the interval between cerclage and delivery. Secondary outcomes included delivery weight, fetal or neonatal death, and neonatal morbidity, including neonatal intensive care unit admission.
RESULTS: Data were included from 140 patients with cervical dilation of at least 1 cm; 85 women had non-prolapsed membranes and 55 women had prolapsed membranes. Among patients with non-prolapsed membranes, the mean duration of pregnancy at delivery was later (P<0.001), the latency between cerclage and delivery was longer (P<0.001), neonatal survival was higher (P=0.036), mean delivery weight was higher (P<0.001), the prevalence of preterm delivery was lower (P<0.001), and severe neonatal morbidity and neonatal intensive care unit admission were lower (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Having non-prolapsed membranes was associated with improved perinatal outcomes following emergency cerclage.
© 2017 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical dilation; Cervical insufficiency; Emergency cervical cerclage; Membrane protrusion; Perinatal outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281278     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  3 in total

1.  Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis.

Authors:  Max Mönckeberg; Rafael Valdés; Juan P Kusanovic; Manuel Schepeler; Jyh K Nien; Emiliano Pertossi; Pablo Silva; Karla Silva; Pía Venegas; Ulises Guajardo; Roberto Romero; Sebastián E Illanes
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.716

2.  Effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ceren Golbasi; Hakan Golbasi; Burak Bayraktar; Baris Sever; Tayfun Vural; Atalay Ekin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Correlation Between Clinical Factors and Pregnancy Outcome Following Repeat Cerclage: A Retrospective Analysis of a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Benshuo Cai; Yajun Xia; Xinni Na
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.