INTRODUCTION: Metabolic surgery is known to impact glucose tolerance but the exact mechanism is still unclear. Based on recently-published data, especially the role of the hindgut may require redefinition. METHODS: Either a loop duodeno-jejunostomy (DJOS) with exclusion of one third of total intestinal length, a loop duodeno-ileostomy (DiOS, exclusion of two thirds), or SHAM operation was performed in 9-week-old Zucker diabetic fatty rats. One, 3, and 6 months after surgery, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and glucose-stimulated hormone analyses were conducted. Body weight was documented weekly. RESULTS: DJOS and DiOS animals showed significantly better glucose control in all OGTTs than the SHAM group (two-way ANOVA p < 0.0001). Body weight developed largely parallel in both intervention groups; SHAM animals had gained significantly less weight after 6 months (Mann-Whitney DJOS/DiOS vs. SHAM p < 0.05, DJOS vs. DiOS p > 0.05). Operative interventions had no impact on GLP-1 and GIP levels at any time point (Mann-Whitney p > 0.05 for all). DJOS/DiOS operations could preserve insulin production up to 6 months, while there was already a sharp decline of insulin levels in the SHAM group (Mann-Whitney: DJOS/DiOS vs. SHAM p < 0.05 for all time points). Additionally, insulin sensitivity was improved significantly 1 month postoperative in both intervention groups compared to SHAM (Mann-Whitney DJOS/DiOS vs. SHAM p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The data of the current study demonstrate a sharp amelioration of glucose control after duodenal exclusion with unchanged levels of GLP-1 and GIP. Direct or delayed hindgut stimulation had no impact on glucose control in our model.
INTRODUCTION: Metabolic surgery is known to impact glucose tolerance but the exact mechanism is still unclear. Based on recently-published data, especially the role of the hindgut may require redefinition. METHODS: Either a loop duodeno-jejunostomy (DJOS) with exclusion of one third of total intestinal length, a loop duodeno-ileostomy (DiOS, exclusion of two thirds), or SHAM operation was performed in 9-week-old Zucker diabetic fatty rats. One, 3, and 6 months after surgery, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and glucose-stimulated hormone analyses were conducted. Body weight was documented weekly. RESULTS: DJOS and DiOS animals showed significantly better glucose control in all OGTTs than the SHAM group (two-way ANOVA p < 0.0001). Body weight developed largely parallel in both intervention groups; SHAM animals had gained significantly less weight after 6 months (Mann-Whitney DJOS/DiOS vs. SHAM p < 0.05, DJOS vs. DiOS p > 0.05). Operative interventions had no impact on GLP-1 and GIP levels at any time point (Mann-Whitney p > 0.05 for all). DJOS/DiOS operations could preserve insulin production up to 6 months, while there was already a sharp decline of insulin levels in the SHAM group (Mann-Whitney: DJOS/DiOS vs. SHAM p < 0.05 for all time points). Additionally, insulin sensitivity was improved significantly 1 month postoperative in both intervention groups compared to SHAM (Mann-Whitney DJOS/DiOS vs. SHAM p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The data of the current study demonstrate a sharp amelioration of glucose control after duodenal exclusion with unchanged levels of GLP-1 and GIP. Direct or delayed hindgut stimulation had no impact on glucose control in our model.
Entities:
Keywords:
Duodeno-enterostomy; Metabolic surgery; Obesity surgery; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Authors: Florian Seyfried; Marco Bueter; Kerstin Spliethoff; Alexander D Miras; Kathrin Abegg; Thomas A Lutz; Carel W le Roux Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Francesco Rubino; Michel Gagner; Paolo Gentileschi; Subhash Kini; Shoji Fukuyama; John Feng; Ed Diamond Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Charles Robb Flynn; Vance L Albaugh; Steven Cai; Joyce Cheung-Flynn; Phillip E Williams; Robert M Brucker; Seth R Bordenstein; Yan Guo; David H Wasserman; Naji N Abumrad Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 14.919