Literature DB >> 28281227

Patient preferences regarding atrial fibrillation stroke prophylaxis in patients at potential risk of atrial fibrillation.

Nicholas T Edwards1, Erica D Greanya1,2, Peter S Loewen2, Celia L Culley3,4.   

Abstract

Background With an increasing number of options for atrial fibrillation (AF) stroke prophylaxis, there are several medication-related factors to consider. This study aimed to gain a better understanding of which preference factors influence patient decisions when selecting AF stroke prophylaxis. Objective To determine the factors that influence patient stroke prophylaxis decisions and preferred therapeutic options. Methods A questionnaire about AF stroke prophylaxis medication options was distributed to participants at risk of AF. Preferences were elicited through ranking and rating medication preference factor statements, then selecting most and least preferred treatment options. Results Reduced stroke risk and lowest risk of an intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) had the highest median preference factor ranking of 2 (IQR, 1-3.5 for stroke reduction; 2-4 for ICH risk). Reducing stroke risk, availability of a lab test to assess drug effect, and availability of an antidote were the preference factors with the highest ratings. Apixaban was the most preferred treatment option (44% blinded to drug name, 37% unblinded) while 'No treatment' was the least preferred option (48% blinded, 52% unblinded). Conclusions Reducing stroke risk and limiting ICH risk were the most important medication factors to participants. High inter-participant preference variability suggests the importance of including the patient in decision-making when selecting AF stroke prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Canada; Outpatients; Patient preference; Prevention; Shared decision making; Stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281227     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0440-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  10 in total

Review 1.  Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Samantha MacLean; Sohail Mulla; Elie A Akl; Milosz Jankowski; Per Olav Vandvik; Shanil Ebrahim; Shelley McLeod; Neera Bhatnagar; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Christian T Ruff; Robert P Giugliano; Eugene Braunwald; Elaine B Hoffman; Naveen Deenadayalu; Michael D Ezekowitz; A John Camm; Jeffrey I Weitz; Basil S Lewis; Alexander Parkhomenko; Takeshi Yamashita; Elliott M Antman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Avoidance hierarchies and preferences for anticoagulation--semi-qualitative analysis of older patients' views about stroke prevention and the use of warfarin.

Authors:  Richard Fuller; Nigel Dudley; Jon Blacktop
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Epidemiologic assessment of chronic atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: the Framingham study.

Authors:  P A Wolf; T R Dawber; H E Thomas; W B Kannel
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Oral anticoagulants to reduce the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation: how should a clinician choose?

Authors:  Ilyas Mohammed; Wajihuddin Syed; Peter R Kowey
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Influence of decision aids on patient preferences for anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Renée Labiris; Charles H Goldsmith; Kaede Ota; Sandra Harb; Rolf J Sebaldt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Prescribing patterns of novel oral anticoagulants following regulatory approval for atrial fibrillation in Ontario, Canada: a population-based descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Anne M Holbrook; Christopher S Simpson; Dar Dowlatshahi; Ana P Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2013-10-16

Review 8.  Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Dominick Frosch; Richard Thomson; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Amy Lloyd; Paul Kinnersley; Emma Cording; Dave Tomson; Carole Dodd; Stephen Rollnick; Adrian Edwards; Michael Barry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Predictors of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victoria L Baczek; Wendy T Chen; Jeffrey Kluger; Craig I Coleman
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Patient values and preferences when choosing anticoagulants.

Authors:  Ana M Palacio; Irene Kirolos; Leonardo Tamariz
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.711

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.