Philip C Müller1, Daniel C Steinemann2, Felix Nickel2, Lukas Chinczewski2, Beat P Müller-Stich2, Georg R Linke2,3, Kaspar Z'graggen4. 1. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. philip.mueller@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Department of Surgery, Spital STS AG Thun, Thun, Switzerland. 4. Berner Viszeralchirurgie, Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden, Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgery for chronic pancreatitis is afflicted with high morbidity. A novel transduodenal-transpapillary endopancreatic resection (EPR) may provide a less invasive alternative approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After laparoscopic duodenotomy the papilla was dilated and accessed with a rigid resectoscope. A resection of pancreatic head tissue was performed from inside the organ. First, the feasibility and resection volume were assessed in bovine pancreas. Bleeding and intraoperative complications were evaluated in an acute in vivo pig model. Finally, the total laparoscopic approach was tested in human cadavers. RESULTS: EPR was feasible in 6/6 bovine and 5/6 porcine pancreases; in one case the papilla could not be located. The resected surface accounted for 30 (23-39)% of the total pancreatic surface and the resection volume was 14.2 (9-25) cm3. In vivo blood loss was minimal [10 (5-20) ml]. The operating time for EPR was 84 (75-110) min in all cadavers. CONCLUSION: The EPR technique is feasible and provides a resection comparable with duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR). Given the reduced surgical trauma, EPR may emerge as a minimally invasive alternative to DPPHR.
BACKGROUND: Surgery for chronic pancreatitis is afflicted with high morbidity. A novel transduodenal-transpapillary endopancreatic resection (EPR) may provide a less invasive alternative approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After laparoscopic duodenotomy the papilla was dilated and accessed with a rigid resectoscope. A resection of pancreatic head tissue was performed from inside the organ. First, the feasibility and resection volume were assessed in bovine pancreas. Bleeding and intraoperative complications were evaluated in an acute in vivo pig model. Finally, the total laparoscopic approach was tested in human cadavers. RESULTS: EPR was feasible in 6/6 bovine and 5/6 porcine pancreases; in one case the papilla could not be located. The resected surface accounted for 30 (23-39)% of the total pancreatic surface and the resection volume was 14.2 (9-25) cm3. In vivo blood loss was minimal [10 (5-20) ml]. The operating time for EPR was 84 (75-110) min in all cadavers. CONCLUSION: The EPR technique is feasible and provides a resection comparable with duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR). Given the reduced surgical trauma, EPR may emerge as a minimally invasive alternative to DPPHR.
Authors: B P Müller-Stich; J D Senft; F Lasitschka; M Shevchenko; A T Billeter; T Bruckner; H G Kenngott; L Fischer; T Gehrig Journal: Hernia Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Angelo Andriulli; B Joseph Elmunzer; Alberto Mariani; Tobias Meister; Jacques Deviere; Tomasz Marek; Todd H Baron; Cesare Hassan; Pier A Testoni; Christine Kapral Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Vanessa M Banz; Philip C Müller; Pascale Tinguely; Daniel Inderbitzin; Delphine Ribes; Matthias Peterhans; Daniel Candinas; Stefan Weber Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Aliye Uc; Radhamma Giriyappa; David K Meyerholz; Michelle Griffin; Lynda S Ostedgaard; Xiao Xiao Tang; Marwa Abu-El-Haija; David A Stoltz; Paula Ludwig; Alejandro Pezzulo; Maisam Abu-El-Haija; Peter Taft; Michael J Welsh Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Christopher S Rogers; David A Stoltz; David K Meyerholz; Lynda S Ostedgaard; Tatiana Rokhlina; Peter J Taft; Mark P Rogan; Alejandro A Pezzulo; Philip H Karp; Omar A Itani; Amanda C Kabel; Christine L Wohlford-Lenane; Greg J Davis; Robert A Hanfland; Tony L Smith; Melissa Samuel; David Wax; Clifton N Murphy; August Rieke; Kristin Whitworth; Aliye Uc; Timothy D Starner; Kim A Brogden; Joel Shilyansky; Paul B McCray; Joseph Zabner; Randall S Prather; Michael J Welsh Journal: Science Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Philip C Müller; Daniel C Steinemann; Lukas Chinczewski; Gencay Hatiboglu; Felix Nickel; Kaspar Z'graggen; Beat P Müller-Stich Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Benjamin Eigl; Caroline Haslebacher; Philip C Muller; Andreas Andreou; Beat Gloor; Matthias Peterhans Journal: IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol Date: 2020-06-03