Paul T Reidy1,2, Michael S Borack1,2, Melissa M Markofski3, Jared M Dickinson1,2,3, Christopher S Fry1,2, Rachel R Deer3, Elena Volpi3,4, Blake B Rasmussen5,6,7. 1. Center for Recovery, Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77550, USA. 2. Department of Nutrition and Metabolism, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555-1142, USA. 3. Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77550, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine/Geriatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77550, USA. 5. Center for Recovery, Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77550, USA. blrasmus@utmb.edu. 6. Department of Nutrition and Metabolism, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555-1142, USA. blrasmus@utmb.edu. 7. Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77550, USA. blrasmus@utmb.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Acute bouts of resistance exercise and subsequent training alters protein turnover in skeletal muscle. The mechanisms responsible for the changes in basal post-absorptive protein turnover and its impact on muscle hypertrophy following resistance exercise training are unknown. Our goal was to determine whether post-absorptive muscle protein turnover following 12 weeks of resistance exercise training (RET) plays a role in muscle hypertrophy. In addition, we were interested in determining potential molecular mechanisms responsible for altering post-training muscle protein turnover. METHODS: Healthy young men (n = 31) participated in supervised whole body progressive RET at 60-80% 1 repetition maximum (1-RM), 3 days/week for 3 months. Pre- and post-training vastus lateralis muscle biopsies and blood samples taken during an infusion of 13C6 and 15N phenylalanine and were used to assess skeletal muscle protein turnover in the post-absorptive state. Lean body mass (LBM), muscle strength (determined by dynamometry), vastus lateralis muscle thickness (MT), myofiber type-specific cross-sectional area (CSA), and mRNA were assessed pre- and post-RET. RESULTS: RET increased strength (12-40%), LBM (~5%), MT (~15%) and myofiber CSA (~20%) (p < 0.05). Muscle protein synthesis (MPS) increased 24% while muscle protein breakdown (MPB) decreased 21%, respectively. These changes in protein turnover resulted in an improved net muscle protein balance in the basal state following RET. Further, the change in basal MPS is positively associated (r = 0.555, p = 0.003) with the change in muscle thickness. CONCLUSION: Post-absorptive muscle protein turnover is associated with muscle hypertrophy during resistance exercise training.
PURPOSE: Acute bouts of resistance exercise and subsequent training alters protein turnover in skeletal muscle. The mechanisms responsible for the changes in basal post-absorptive protein turnover and its impact on muscle hypertrophy following resistance exercise training are unknown. Our goal was to determine whether post-absorptive muscle protein turnover following 12 weeks of resistance exercise training (RET) plays a role in muscle hypertrophy. In addition, we were interested in determining potential molecular mechanisms responsible for altering post-training muscle protein turnover. METHODS: Healthy young men (n = 31) participated in supervised whole body progressive RET at 60-80% 1 repetition maximum (1-RM), 3 days/week for 3 months. Pre- and post-training vastus lateralis muscle biopsies and blood samples taken during an infusion of 13C6 and 15N phenylalanine and were used to assess skeletal muscle protein turnover in the post-absorptive state. Lean body mass (LBM), muscle strength (determined by dynamometry), vastus lateralis muscle thickness (MT), myofiber type-specific cross-sectional area (CSA), and mRNA were assessed pre- and post-RET. RESULTS: RET increased strength (12-40%), LBM (~5%), MT (~15%) and myofiber CSA (~20%) (p < 0.05). Muscle protein synthesis (MPS) increased 24% while muscle protein breakdown (MPB) decreased 21%, respectively. These changes in protein turnover resulted in an improved net muscle protein balance in the basal state following RET. Further, the change in basal MPS is positively associated (r = 0.555, p = 0.003) with the change in muscle thickness. CONCLUSION: Post-absorptive muscle protein turnover is associated with muscle hypertrophy during resistance exercise training.
Authors: Juha J Hulmi; Vuokko Kovanen; Harri Selänne; William J Kraemer; Keijo Häkkinen; Antti A Mero Journal: Amino Acids Date: 2008-07-27 Impact factor: 3.520
Authors: Hans C Dreyer; Satoshi Fujita; Jerson G Cadenas; David L Chinkes; Elena Volpi; Blake B Rasmussen Journal: J Physiol Date: 2006-07-27 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Juha J Hulmi; Jörgen Tannerstedt; Harri Selänne; Heikki Kainulainen; Vuokko Kovanen; Antti A Mero Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2009-03-19
Authors: Jason E Tang; Jennifer G Perco; Daniel R Moore; Sarah B Wilkinson; Stuart M Phillips Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2007-11-21 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Felipe Damas; Stuart M Phillips; Cleiton A Libardi; Felipe C Vechin; Manoel E Lixandrão; Paulo R Jannig; Luiz A R Costa; Aline V Bacurau; Tim Snijders; Gianni Parise; Valmor Tricoli; Hamilton Roschel; Carlos Ugrinowitsch Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Carmine Settembre; Roberto Zoncu; Diego L Medina; Francesco Vetrini; Serkan Erdin; SerpilUckac Erdin; Tuong Huynh; Mathieu Ferron; Gerard Karsenty; Michel C Vellard; Valeria Facchinetti; David M Sabatini; Andrea Ballabio Journal: EMBO J Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Tatiana Moro; Camille R Brightwell; Rachel R Deer; Ted G Graber; Elfego Galvan; Christopher S Fry; Elena Volpi; Blake B Rasmussen Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kaleen M Lavin; Brandon M Roberts; Christopher S Fry; Tatiana Moro; Blake B Rasmussen; Marcas M Bamman Journal: Physiology (Bethesda) Date: 2019-03-01
Authors: Tatiana Moro; Camille R Brightwell; Danielle E Phalen; Colleen F McKenna; Samantha J Lane; Craig Porter; Elena Volpi; Blake B Rasmussen; Christopher S Fry Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Henning T Langer; Daniel West; Joan Senden; Simone Spuler; Luc J C van Loon; Keith Baar Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Chris McGlory; Stephan van Vliet; Tanner Stokes; Bettina Mittendorfer; Stuart M Phillips Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Michael D Roberts; Cody T Haun; Christopher B Mobley; Petey W Mumford; Matthew A Romero; Paul A Roberson; Christopher G Vann; John J McCarthy Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Emily E Howard; Lee M Margolis; Claire E Berryman; Harris R Lieberman; J Philip Karl; Andrew J Young; Monty A Montano; William J Evans; Nancy R Rodriguez; Neil M Johannsen; Kishore M Gadde; Melissa N Harris; Jennifer C Rood; Stefan M Pasiakos Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Christopher G Vann; Shelby C Osburn; Petey W Mumford; Paul A Roberson; Carlton D Fox; Casey L Sexton; McLelland-Rae Johnson; Joel S Johnson; Jacob Shake; Johnathon H Moore; Kevin Millevoi; Darren T Beck; Veera L D Badisa; Benjamin M Mwashote; Victor Ibeanusi; Rakesh K Singh; Michael D Roberts Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Robert V Musci; Maureen A Walsh; Adam R Konopka; Christopher A Wolff; Frederick F Peelor; Raoul F Reiser; Kelly S Santangelo; Karyn L Hamilton Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 4.566