Literature DB >> 28280728

The Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Is Associated with Coronary Artery Calcification in Asymptomatic Korean Males: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Su-Hyun Nam1, Sung-Goo Kang1, Sang-Wook Song2.   

Abstract

Introduction. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a significant systemic predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) reflects coronary artery calcification and is an independent risk factor for coronary artery stenosis. In the present study, we explored the relationship between the NLR and CACS in terms of subclinical inflammation and coronary artery calcification. Materials and Methods. We evaluated males and females who did not have CVD, diabetes, high blood pressure, or high fasting blood sugar levels. We measured white blood cell, neutrophil, lymphocyte counts, fasting blood sugar, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in blood samples. We also obtained CACSs using coronary multidetector computed tomography. Results. Multivariate logistic regression showed that older age was significantly associated with a higher CACS (P < 0.001); males had higher CACSs than females (P < 0.001); and the higher the TG level, the higher the CACS (P = 0.019). The NLR of males, but not females, was significantly associated with the CACS. Conclusion. An independent association between the NLR and CACS was thus evident in healthy adult males after adjusting for other CVD risk factors. Therefore, the NLR is a significant predictor of potential CVD in male subjects with subclinical atherosclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28280728      PMCID: PMC5322435          DOI: 10.1155/2017/1989417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


1. Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) caused by atherosclerosis is a leading cause of adult death in developed countries [1]. In South Korea, westernization of eating habits and aging of the population are today associated with high CAD-associated morbidity and mortality. Atherosclerosis is a multifactorial disease involving several cardiovascular risk factors including dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, a high blood glucose level, and smoking. Recent studies have shown that atherosclerosis is not a passive injury caused by deposition of serum lipids and other substances on vascular walls but rather is an active inflammatory process [2]. Leukocytes are activated during inflammation, triggering the development of atherosclerosis and greatly increasing the risk of thrombus formation [3]. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (the neutrophil count divided by the lymphocyte count) is easily derived and serves as an indicator of systemic inflammation [4, 5]. The NLR is prognostic of acute coronary syndrome and is considered a much more reliable predictor than is any other predictor based on leukocyte data [6, 7]. The NLR is a marker of inflammation and is predictive of death, myocardial infarction, and coronary artery disease [6, 8, 9]. A high NLR is prognostic of atherosclerotic progression [10]. Furthermore, many epidemiological studies have shown that chronic low-grade inflammation, as indicated by the NLR, plays roles in diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, obesity, dyslipidemia, and endothelial dysfunction [11, 12]. Coronary multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is a relatively novel method used to diagnose coronary artery disease. The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) reflects the extent of calcification of the coronary arteries. The CACS was calculated by the method of Agatston et al., yielding a total CACS that is the sum of the CACSs of each artery [13]. A higher CACS indicates a higher risk of CVD [14]. The CACS is proportional to the extent of atherosclerotic plaque and can predict coronary artery stenosis, another independent predictor of ischemic heart disease [15, 16]. Calculation of CACSs would assist in reducing the incidence of ischemic heart disease, allowing an early diagnosis of coronary artery atherosclerosis. Today, the Framingham risk score, which considers various risk factors (age, sex, high blood pressure, the presence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking), is widely used to evaluate the risk of CVD. However, approximately half of all patients with CVD have either none or one of these risk factors [17, 18]. As inflammation is associated with atherosclerosis development and progression, we hypothesized that the NLR, considered in combination with other risk factors, aids in the prediction of CVD. Thus, we explored whether the NLR was associated with atherosclerosis measured by the CACS in healthy Korean subjects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The study subjects were 1,009 adults who underwent complete physical examinations and MDCT in the Health Promotion Center of a general hospital located in Gyeonggi-do, Korea. Of these subjects, those who had cancer, angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, and cerebral or peripheral vascular disease were excluded, as were those diagnosed with hypertension or diabetes or who were taking medications to treat these conditions. We performed more than two checkups on all subjects and excluded those who, on any checkup, had a systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg, a diastolic pressure >90 mmHg, and a blood fasting blood sugar level >126 mL/dL. Also, subjects with white blood cell (WBC) counts >10,000/μL were excluded, because they may have had acute infectious disease. Finally, 599 subjects participated in the study.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Basic Survey and Physical Examination

Before examination, we recorded any history of high blood pressure, diabetes, angina pectoris, or myocardial infarction. Additionally, we noted the medications used, smoking history, drinking history, and exercise habits. Weight and height were estimated to the nearest 100 g and 1 cm, respectively. BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height2 (m2). Waist circumference (WC) was measured under the ribs (at the upper midpoint of the crista iliaca) to the nearest 1 cm, with each subject erect, feet 30 cm apart, and exhaling comfortably. Blood pressure was measured automatically after each subject had been seated for 20 min.

2.2.2. Biochemical Tests

Blood was drawn from the brachial vein the morning after an overnight fast. We measured WBC, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts and the blood levels of fasting glucose (FBG), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (a-GTP), creatinine, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, uric acid, calcium, phosphate, and albumin.

2.2.3. CACS

CACSs were calculated from the heart CT scans obtained using the aid of a 64-slice MDCT scanner (Sensation 64; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Scans were obtained after at least 6 h of fasting, with caffeine intake prohibited. If the heart rate of a subject who was not on a beta-blocker was >65 beats per min, we sought to lower the heart rate by giving atenolol (25–75 mg) 1 h before scanning. Using an autoimpregnator, we injected 60–70 mL nonionic contrast medium (Ultravist 370, Schering, Germany) followed by saline (40 mL) into the ulnar artery. We electrocardiographically synchronized the heart CT and calculated each CACS via reconstruction (Wizard; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). CACS was calculated using the method of Agatston. The coronary artery was divided into four segments, and the scores of each segment were calculated and summed. We used the extent of pigmentation to calculate each CACS (0, >0).

2.2.4. Statistics

Data were compared using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). We compared between-group parameters using the t-test. To afford a 95% predictive power of an odds ratio (OR) of 2 at the 5% significance level, the two-tailed t-test indicated that 502 subjects were required [19]. ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by multivariate logistic regression. A P value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

2.2.5. Ethics Statement

This study was implemented in accordance with ethical and safety guidelines upon the approval of the Institutional Review Board in The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital (IRB approval number: VC15RISI0068). The study was exempted from the written informed consent to participants because we reviewed the health screening data and medical record retrogradely. The IRBs approved this consent procedure.

3. Results

3.1. General Subject Characteristics

Of the 599 subjects, 473 (79%) had a CACS of 0 and 126 (21%) a CACS > 0. The average age of the latter group was 56.06 ± 8.99 years, significantly higher than that of the CACS = 0 group (49.09 ± 56.06 years; P < 0.001). In the CACS > 0 group, WC, systolic blood pressure, and levels of ALT, GTP, TC, and TG were significantly higher than those of the CACS = 0 group. The WBC count and NLR did not differ significantly between the groups (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study populations.

CACS = 0CACS > 0 P value
Age (year)49.04 ± 8.4656.06 ± 9.00<0.001
Sex<0.001
 Male295 (74.3%)102 (25.8%)
 Female178 (88.1%)24 (11.9%)
Smoking0.912
 Nonsmoker337 (78.7%)91 (21.3%)
 Smoker136 (79.5%)35 (20.5%)
BMI (kg/m2)23.91 ± 2.7024.62 ± 3.200.011
WC (cm)84.31 ± 8.4186.88 ± 8.420.003
SBP (mmHg)119.43 ± 11.37122.27 ± 10.100.007
DBP (mmHg)72.68 ± 8.3272.92 ± 7.540.761
WBC (103/μL)5.95 ± 1.586.24 ± 1.730.086
Neutrophils (103/μL)53.07 ± 8.7852.19 ± 8.160.315
Lymphocytes (103/μL)36.28 ± 7.7036.90 ± 7.880.435
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio1.59 ± 0.631.53 ± 0.600.416
Hb14.78 ± 1.5515.05 ± 1.370.059
Albumin4.54 ± 0.294.47 ± 0.390.084
FBS (mg/dL)92.03 ± 9.1995.83 ± 10.77<0.001
TG (mg/dL)124.83 ± 72.68141.77 ± 72.700.020
TC (mg/dL)201.98 ± 35.47213.47 ± 64.240.008
HDL-C (mg/dL)47.24 ± 11.0045.40 ± 9.850.090
AST (IU/L)22.06 ± 12.3224.29 ± 11.540.068
ALT (IU/L)25.49 ± 20.4830.09 ± 24.590.032
rGTP (IU/L)32.78 ± 33.1644.85 ± 52.530.015
Cr (mg/dL)0.84 ± 0.160.97 ± 0.740.061
UA (mg/dL)5.58 ± 1.455.78 ± 1.370.182
Ca9.09 ± 0.359.96 ± 8.990.317
P3.27 ± 0.473.28 ± 0.460.735
Ca/P Ratio2.84 ± 0.423.13 ± 3.270.360
hsCRP (mg/dL)0.15 ± 0.350.20 ± 0.290.195

3.2. The Relationship between the CACS and CVD Risk Factors in All Subjects

Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the relationships between the CACS and factors that might affect the CACS (Table 2). Aging was an independent risk factor for an elevated CACS; as subject age increased, the CACS rose significantly (P < 0.001). Males had higher CACSs than those of females, and, as the TG level increased, the CACS increased significantly (P = 0.019) (Table 2)
Table 2

Odds ratios and 95% intervals for CACS in men and women in multivariate analysis.

VariablesOR95% CI P value
LowerUpper
Age (year)1.1661.1011.234<0.001
Female0.0480.0100.226<0.001
Current smoker0.6010.2211.6330.318
BMI (kg/m2)1.2070.9461.5390.130
WC (cm)0.9340.8541.0220.136
SBP (mmHg)1.0410.9871.0980.135
DBP (mmHg)0.9610.8951.0320.271
WBC (103/μL)0.9600.7101.2990.793
Neutrophils (103/μL)1.0620.9361.2050.353
Lymphocytes (103/μL)1.1010.9381.2790.208
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio2.2090.22221.9380.499
Hemoglobin0.6520.4390.9670.034
Albumin0.1760.0310.9950.049
FBS (mg/dL)0.9930.9511.0370.760
TC (mg/dL)0.9990.9901.0090.854
HDL-C (mg/dL)1.0010.9591.0440.975
TG (mg/dL)1.0081.0011.0140.019
AST (IU/L)1.0761.0081.1470.027
ALT (IU/L)0.9970.9601.0350.870
rGTP (IU/L)0.9940.9811.0080.415
Cr (mg/dL)2.2610.42212.1190.341
UA (mg/dL)1.0770.7941.4610.635
Ca1.9120.3623.3880.315
P0.6420.0085.6400.843
Ca/P ratio0.7590.0069.7620.910
hsCRP (mg/dL)1.0780.3403.4110.899

3.3. The Relationship between the CACS and CVD Risk Factors in Males

We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate 397 males in terms of the relationships between the CACS and factors that might affect the CACS. The CACS increased significantly (P < 0.001) with the age of healthy asymptomatic males and was also significantly associated with elevated systolic blood pressure (P = 0.039). Of the hematological factors evaluated, the NLR was found to be an independent risk factor for an elevated CACS; the CACS increased significantly with the NLR (P = 0.045). Of the lipid-related factors, the higher the TG level, the higher the CACS (P = 0.022) (Table 3). After adjusting other factors, area under the ROC curve of NLR in predicting CAC was 0.74 (95% CI = 0.66–0.82) (Figure 1).
Table 3

Odds ratios and 95% intervals for CACS in men in multivariate analysis.

VariablesOR95% CI P value
LowerUpper
Age (year)1.1541.0771.237<0.001
Current smoker0.4990.1591.5650.233
BMI (kg/m2)1.0240.7351.4280.887
WC (cm)0.9460.8391.0660.362
SBP (mmHg)1.0761.0041.1530.039
DBP (mmHg)0.9240.8461.0100.083
WBC (103/μL)0.8740.6001.2750.485
Neutrophils (103/μL)0.9560.8451.0830.479
Lymphocytes (103/μL)1.1480.9661.3650.118
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio7.4641.04753.2120.045
Hemoglobin0.5840.3430.9930.047
Albumin0.3680.0522.6020.317
FBS (mg/dL)0.9700.9211.0220.257
TC (mg/dL)1.0040.9941.0140.445
HDL-C (mg/dL)0.9760.9221.0200.416
TG (mg/dL)1.0111.0011.0200.022
AST (IU/L)1.0951.0071.1890.033
ALT (IU/L)0.9840.9401.0300.487
rGTP (IU/L)0.9910.9741.0070.256
Cr (mg/dL)2.2400.5069.9180.288
UA (mg/dL)0.9880.6931.4090.948
Ca3.3760.24147.2100.366
P10.4770.02839.1280.437
Ca/P ratio8.4640.24147.2100.507
hsCRP (mg/dL)3.2510.38527.4220.279
Figure 1

The graphs represent area under the ROC curve (AUC) of NLR in predicting CAC in men. Model was adjusted with age, smoking, BMI, WC, SBP, DBP, WBC, Hb, albumin, FBS, TC, HDL-C, TG, AST, ALT, rGTP, Cr, Uric acid, Ca, P, Ca/P ratio, and hs-CRP.

3.4. The Relationship between the CACS and CVD Factors in Females

Of all 136 women, age (P < 0.001), body mass index (P = 0.011), and current smoking status (P = 0.002) independently and significantly affected the CACS. No significant relationship was evident between the NLR and CACS in females (Table 4).
Table 4

Odds ratios and 95% intervals for CACS in women in multivariate analysis.

VariablesOR95% CI P value
LowerUpper
Age (year)1.3031.1381.492<0.001
Current smoker99.8725.4501830.1270.002
BMI (kg/m2)1.7351.1352.6540.011
WC (cm)0.9070.8221.0010.052
SBP (mmHg)1.0080.9221.1010.867
DBP (mmHg)0.9430.8231.0800.394
Neutrophils (103/μL)1.2040.9541.5190.117
Lymphocytes (103/μL)0.7980.5961.0670.128
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio0.0100.0002.5850.104
Hemoglobin0.7480.3911.4320.381
FBS (mg/dL)1.0520.9721.1390.211
TC (mg/dL)1.0120.9891.0360.314
HDL-C (mg/dL)0.9770.9051.0550.553
TG (mg/dL)0.9890.9771.0020.095
AST (IU/L)0.2530.7281.0870.253
ALT (IU/L)1.1550.9881.3500.071
rGTP (IU/L)0.9750.9261.0270.348
UA (mg/dL)0.5670.2391.3440.198
Ca6.3260.29112.8260.167
P0.1630.00013.8970.694
Ca/P ratio0.2160.00017.1470.791

4. Discussion

We explored the relationship between the NLR and the CACS to determine if the NLR (a measure of subclinical inflammation) predicted the extent of coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic subjects. For healthy males (but not females), an increase in the NLR was correlated independently with an increase in the CACS. Inflammation plays critical roles in many coronary artery diseases [20]. Atherosclerosis is a complex of inflammatory diseases [21]. Leukocytes contribute substantially to progression of inflammation [22], and several prospective studies have found positive correlations between leukocyte (total and differential) counts and the development of CVD in both adult males and females [23, 24]. The NLR is a well-recognized biomarker of inflammation [25]. When the WBC count is within the normal range, a higher NLR is indicative of a greater risk of atherosclerotic disease [6]. The NLR is associated with other clinical inflammatory markers. Balta et al. reported that there were moderate positive correlations between carotid intima media thickness value, C-reactive protein, and NLR in patients with Behçet disease [26]. Unlike many other inflammatory markers, the NLR is inexpensive and readily available and it provides additional risk stratification beyond conventional risk scores [27]. However, NLR values may be changed by medications. Fici et al. reported that nebivolol improved NLR to a greater extent than metoprolol in patients with hypertension [28]. Balta et al. found that increased NLR may play a role not only in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease but also in the pathophysiology of coronary artery ectasia [29]. Additionally, the NLR is associated with both the risk and severity of CVD [30]. Shen et al. found that the NLR significantly predicted long-term mortality in 551 STEMI patients who underwent early cardiac revascularization (hazard ratio 2.27, 95% CI 1.32–4.29; P = 0.002) [31]. Wang et al. performed a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies on patients who underwent angiography or cardiac revascularization; the relative risk (RR) of all-cause mortality in the high-NLR group was 2.33 (95% CI 1.88–2.88), and the RR of a cardiovascular event was 1.89 (95% CI 1.88–2.88). Thus the NLR significantly predicted both all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with CVD [32]. Coronary artery calcification is closely associated with coronary artery disease [33]. The CACS reflects both the extent and distribution of coronary artery calcification, which reliably predicts the CVD risk [34-36]. As calcium deposits increase, so does the CVD risk [37]. One systematic study found that when the CACS was 0, the prevalence of CVD was 0.56%, and the negative predictive value 99% (thus very high) [38]. When the CACS was <100, the risk of an angiographic diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis (>50%) was <3% [39]. In a 3-year study on 2,000 asymptomatic adults, a CAC > 0 increased the risk of CVD 10.5-fold in males and 2.6-fold in females [40]. Turkmen et al. evaluated 56 patients (34 males, 22 females) with end-stage renal disease who were on dialysis for >6 months. Except for in those with acute infections, autoimmune diseases, acute heart failure, or CVD, the NLR and CACS were significantly correlated (r = 0.3, P = 0.02) [41]. Also, in a study of 290 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, those with NLRs ≤2.05 had lower CACSs and a lower incidence of obstructive coronary artery disease than did those with NLRs >2.05 [42]. Park et al. used multivariate logistic regression to show that a high NLR was independently associated with an elevated CACS in 849 Koreans [43]. The cited work included patients with hypertension and diabetes, and the data were not analyzed by sex. We excluded patients with diabetes or hypertension and showed that the NLR was correlated independently with the CACS (after adjustment for other CVD risk factors) of healthy adult males with FBG levels <126 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg. Therefore, the NLR can be used to predict CVD not only in patients at high risk of CVD (such as those with diabetes, hypertension, and chronic renal failure) but also in asymptomatic healthy adult males. We found that the TG level was independently associated with the CACS, in agreement with the data of Cao et al. [44]. Tirosh et al. evaluated 13,953 healthy adult males aged 26–45 years for 5 years and found a strong correlation between the TG level and the development of CVD [45]. A meta-analysis of studies on adults of mean age of 56.6 years, over a 12-year follow-up, found that the CVD risk was 1.8-fold greater in those with the highest 20% of TG levels, compared with those with the lowest 20% [46]. Also, in the Framingham study, the risk of CVD was 2-fold higher in those with TG levels of 250–400 mg/dL than in those with TG levels of 50–100 mg/dL [47]. The Copenhagen study recruited middle-aged males (>54 years of age). In those with TG levels >142 mg/dL, the adjusted RR of CVD was 2.2, significantly higher than the RRs of those with lower TG levels [48]. Tirosh et al. showed that elevated TG levels correlated significantly with the body mass index, the extent of physical activity, and breakfast habits [45]. Therefore, lifestyle-mediated management of TG levels will greatly lower the CVD risk. We found a close association between female smoking and the CACS. Lehmann et al. reported that current smoking was an independent risk factor for a CACS > 0, and that the time until reaching a CACS > 0 was approximately 10 years less in current versus former smokers [49]. Smoking lowers the availability of nitrogen oxide, triggering endothelial and vasomotor dysfunction, activating leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions, triggering leucocyte recruitment, increasing the levels of proatherogenic substances by elevating proinflammatory cytokine levels, and triggering oxidative lipid modifications, culminating in atherosclerosis [50]. Our study had a few limitations. First, we considered only present smoking status; we did not record pack-years, and we did not consider alcohol ingestion, self-reporting bias, or stress associated with smoking. Thus, we found no relationship between smoking and the CACS in males. Had we considered the above factors, such an association might have become apparent. Second, our work was cross-sectional in nature; caution is thus appropriate when seeking to identify causative relationships. In conclusion, we found an independent correlation between the NLR and the CACS in asymptomatic Korean adult males. The NLR can be used to predict CVD in subjects with subclinical atherosclerosis.
  50 in total

1.  Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Paolo Raggi; Enrique Schisterman; Daniel S Berman; Tracy Q Callister
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Which white blood cell subtypes predict increased cardiovascular risk?

Authors:  Benjamin D Horne; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jerry M John; Aaron Weaver; Tami L Bair; Kurt R Jensen; Dale G Renlund; Joseph B Muhlestein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  The Relation Between Atherosclerosis and the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio.

Authors:  Sevket Balta; Turgay Celik; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Cengiz Ozturk; Sait Demirkol; Mustafa Aparci; Atila Iyisoy
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 2.389

4.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Relationship of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio with arterial stiffness and coronary calcium score.

Authors:  Byoung-Jin Park; Jae-Yong Shim; Hye-Ree Lee; Jung-Hyun Lee; Dong-Hyuk Jung; Hong-Bae Kim; Ha-Young Na; Yong-Jae Lee
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium screening using multislice CT with retrospective ECG gating.

Authors:  Tobias F Jakobs; Bernd J Wintersperger; Peter Herzog; Thomas Flohr; Christoph Suess; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Umesh N Khot; Monica B Khot; Christopher T Bajzer; Shelly K Sapp; E Magnus Ohman; Sorin J Brener; Stephen G Ellis; A Michael Lincoff; Eric J Topol
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Leukocytes and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Michael Hoffman; Arnon Blum; Roni Baruch; Eli Kaplan; Moshe Benjamin
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.162

9.  Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio may predict mortality in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sevket Balta; Sait Demirkol; Ugur Kucuk; Hakan Sarlak; Omer Kurt; Zekeriya Arslan
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.588

Review 10.  Expert review on coronary calcium.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Khawar M Gul
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
View more
  11 in total

1.  Prediction of calcification tendency in pediatric cystic adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma by using inflammatory markers, hormone markers, and radiological appearances.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Zhang Zhang; Min Yang; Shi-Ting Li
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Serum biomarkers for arterial calcification in humans: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nienke M S Golüke; Marit A Schoffelmeer; Annemarieke De Jonghe; Mariëlle H Emmelot-Vonk; Pim A De Jong; Huiberdina L Koek
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2022-06-18

3.  Association between Neutrophil-Lymphocyte and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratios and Coronary Artery Calcification Score among Asymptomatic Patients: Data from a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Carlos V Serrano; Fernando R de Mattos; Fábio G Pitta; Cesar H Nomura; James de Lemos; José Antonio F Ramires; Roberto Kalil-Filho
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 4.  The Role of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System and Its New Components in Arterial Stiffness and Vascular Aging.

Authors:  Mario Fritsch Neves; Ana Rosa Cunha; Michelle Rabello Cunha; Ronaldo Altenburg Gismondi; Wille Oigman
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2018-02-23

5.  A Simple Blood Test, Such as Complete Blood Count, Can Predict Calcification Grade of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Marika Vezzoli; Stefano Bonardelli; Michele Peroni; Marco Ravanelli; Emirena Garrafa
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2017-08-30

Review 6.  Inflammatory Markers for Arterial Stiffness in Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Ioana Mozos; Clemens Malainer; Jarosław Horbańczuk; Cristina Gug; Dana Stoian; Constantin Tudor Luca; Atanas G Atanasov
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Association between Dietary Intake and Coronary Artery Calcification in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: The PROGREDIR Study.

Authors:  Alisson Diego Machado; Luz Marina Gómez; Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni; Fernanda Silva Nogueira Dos Anjos; Maria Del Carmen Bisi Molina; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Isabela Judith Martins Benseñor; Silvia Maria de Oliveira Titan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Association between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and arterial stiffness in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Yanyan Li; Xiaofang Chen; Lingzhi Huang; Jinyang Lu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is correlated with levels of inflammatory markers and is significantly reduced by smoking cessation.

Authors:  Maki Komiyama; Yuka Ozaki; Yusuke Miyazaki; Yasufumi Katanasaka; Yoichi Sunagawa; Masafumi Funamoto; Kana Shimizu; Hajime Yamakage; Noriko Sato-Asahara; Akihiro Yasoda; Hiromichi Wada; Tatsuya Morimoto; Koji Hasegawa
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Inflammation in Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Chul Soo Park
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.