Literature DB >> 2828070

Prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: a simple prognostic index is better than conventional staging.

M D Vincent1, S E Ashley, I E Smith.   

Abstract

Conventional staging in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is only of limited prognostic value and is often based on elaborate investigations. We have carried out univariate and multivariate analysis of possible prognostic factors at presentation in 333 consecutive patients with SCLC. Fifteen parameters were found to have individual prognostic significance, of which the most powerful were serum albumin, bone marrow aspirate, disease extent and performance status (all P less than 0.00005). Factors which were not of prognostic significance included age, sex, SVC obstruction, and pleural involvement. Multivariate analysis excluded many factors including bone marrow aspirate as not being independently variable, and a simple combination of clinical performance status, serum albumin and alanine transaminase could be used to define 3 groups (good; medium; poor) of better prognostic significance (survival at 1 year 50% vs. 27% vs. 3%) than conventional limited/extensive disease staging (1 year survival 48% vs. 18%). Other simple combinations of biochemical parameters including plasma sodium and alkaline phosphatase achieved almost as good prognostic groupings. We suggest that consideration should be given to replacing the conventional limited/extensive disease staging system with a simpler system along the lines we have described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2828070     DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(87)90436-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-5379


  12 in total

1.  Refining Prognosis in Lung Cancer: A Report on the Quality and Relevance of Clinical Prognostic Tools.

Authors:  Alyson L Mahar; Carolyn Compton; Lisa M McShane; Susan Halabi; Hisao Asamura; Ramon Rami-Porta; Patti A Groome
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  A practical prognostic index for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  T Wigren; H Oksanen; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Chemotherapy in lung cancer.

Authors:  C G Price; M L Slevin
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  First-line chemotherapy rechallenge after relapse in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Vincent; B Evans; I Smith
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  Treatment and outcomes for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R J Stephens; D H Johnson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Prognosis in lung cancer: physicians' opinions compared with outcome and a predictive model.

Authors:  M F Muers; P Shevlin; J Brown
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Investigation, treatment and prognosis of bronchial carcinoma in the Yorkshire Region of England 1976-1983.

Authors:  C K Connolly; W G Jones; J Thorogood; C Head; M F Muers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Analysis of prognostic factors in 766 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC): the role of sex as a predictor for survival.

Authors:  M Wolf; R Holle; K Hans; P Drings; K Havemann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  An overview of prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer. A report from the Subcommittee for the Management of Lung Cancer of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research.

Authors:  N S Rawson; J Peto
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The prognostic influence of serum neuron specific enolase in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L G Jørgensen; K Osterlind; H H Hansen; E H Cooper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.