| Literature DB >> 28280514 |
Chae Ha Yang1, Seong Hun Choi2, Ju Sang Kim3, Yeon Hee Ryu4, Young Jin Lim5, Moon Seup Kim6, Jeong Woo Sohn7, Sung Suk Oh7, Cheongtag Kim8, Mi Young Lee9.
Abstract
We attempted to investigate whether acupuncture stimulation at HT7 can have an effect on brain activation patterns and alcohol abstinence self-efficacy. Thirty-four right-handed healthy subjects were recruited for this study. They were randomly assigned into two groups: the HT7 (Shenmen) group and the LI5 (Yangxi) group. Acupuncture stimulation was performed using a block paradigm during fMRI scanning. Additionally, the Korean version of Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale (AASES) was used to determine the effect of acupuncture stimulation on self-efficacy to abstain from alcohol use. According to the result of fMRI group analysis, the activation induced by HT7 stimulation was found on the bilateral postcentral gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, inferior frontal gyrus, claustrum, insula, and anterior lobe of the cerebellum, as well as on the left posterior lobe of the cerebellum (p < 0.001, uncorrected). According to the AASES analysis, the interaction effect for gender and treatment was marginally significant (F(1, 30) = 4.152, p = 0.050). For female group, the simple main effect of treatment was significant (F(1, 11) = 8.040, p = 0.016), indicating that the mean change score was higher in the HT7 stimulation than in the LI5 stimulation. Therefore, our study has provided evidence to support that HT7 stimulation has a positive therapeutic effect on the alcohol-related diseases.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28280514 PMCID: PMC5322448 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2850124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Characteristics of subjects.
| HT7 group ( | LI5 group ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years ) | 21.94 ± 1.39 | 22.24 ± 1.15 |
| Gender (F/M) | 9/8 | 11/5 |
| AUDIT | 16.71 ± 6.10 | 15.53 ± 7.12 |
| Frequency of drinking | ||
| Monthly or less | 8 (47.1%) | 11 (64.7%) |
| 2 to 4 times a month | 6 (35.3%) | 4 (23.5%) |
| 2 to 3 times a week | 3 (17.6%) | 2 (11.8%) |
| Number of drinks per occasion | ||
| 1 or 2 | 2 (11.8%) | — |
| 3 or 4 | — | — |
| 5 or 6 | 1 (5.9%) | 5 (29.4%) |
| 7, 8, or 9 | 6 (35.3%) | 5 (29.4%) |
| 10 or more | 8 (47.1%) | 7 (41.2%) |
AUDIT: alcohol use disorder identification test.
Figure 1(a) Acupoint of HT7 (Shenmen: experimental acupoint) and LI5 (Yangxi: control acupoint). HT7 is located in the ulnar end of the crease of the wrist, in the depression of the radial side of the tendon of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle of the wrist. LI5 is located on the radial side of the wrist in a depression between extensor pollicis longus and brevis tendons. (b) Experimental block design of fMRI. Acupuncture was applied at each acupoint, followed by 15 blocks of 20 s stimulation and 16 blocks of 20 s rest. S: stimulation. R: rest.
Significant brain activation area for acupuncture stimulation relative to rest block.
| Brain region | Brodmann area | Peak MNI coordinates | Peak | Number of voxels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| HT 7 group: acupuncture stimulation-rest contrast | ||||||
| Right | ||||||
| Postcentral gyrus | 1 | 62 | −24 | 42 | 5.82 | 496 |
| Inferior parietal lobule | 40 | 60 | −24 | 32 | 4.68 | c |
| Inferior frontal gyrus | 47 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 5.39 | 160 |
| Claustrum | — | 28 | 18 | 2 | 4.53 | c |
| Cerebelluma | — | 0 | −54 | −28 | 5.36 | 85 |
| Insula | 13 | 38 | 2 | 14 | 4.22 | 18 |
| Left | ||||||
| Claustrum | — | −36 | −4 | 4 | 6.14 | 760 |
| Insula | 13 | −44 | 6 | 12 | 4.22 | c |
| Postcentral gyrus | 1 | −58 | −26 | 38 | 4.82 | 481 |
| Inferior parietal lobule | 40 | −58 | −24 | 28 | 4.81 | c |
| Cerebellumb | — | −18 | −72 | −36 | 4.78 | 29 |
| Cerebelluma | — | −24 | −48 | −28 | 4.61 | 116 |
| Inferior frontal gyrus | 13 | −36 | 26 | 10 | 4.40 | 30 |
|
| ||||||
| LI5 group: acupuncture stimulation-rest contrast | ||||||
| Right | ||||||
| Inferior parietal lobule | 40 | 60 | −44 | 46 | 4.14 | 34 |
| Left | ||||||
| Claustrum | — | −28 | 16 | −2 | 4.57 | 19 |
p value is uncorrected at p < 0.001. a: anterior lobe; b: posterior lobe; c: an activation area that belongs to the cluster listed in above.
HT7: experimental acupoint. LI5: control acupoint.
Figure 2Brain activation with acupuncture at HT7 (above) and LI5 (bottom). In the HT7 stimulation, activated regions include bilateral postcentral gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, inferior frontal gyrus, claustrum, insula, and anterior lobe of the cerebellum, as well as left posterior lobe of the cerebellum. In LI5 stimulation, the activated regions include the right inferior parietal lobule and left claustrum. Statistical map was significant at p < 0.001 uncorrected level.
Significant brain activation difference between HT7 and LI5 stimulation.
| Brain region | Brodmann area | Peak MNI coordinates | Peak | Number of voxels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| HT7 group > LI5 group | ||||||
| Right | ||||||
| Precuneus | 7 | 22 | −58 | 36 | 4.00 | 59 |
| Precentral gyrus | 6 | 42 | −14 | 28 | 3.86 | 40 |
| Middle occipital gyrus | 19 | 34 | −74 | 18 | 3.85 | 177 |
| Posterior cingulate gyrus | 30 | 20 | −52 | 18 | 3.84 | 98 |
| Medial frontal gyrus | 6 | 2 | −6 | 48 | 3.72 | 51 |
| Cingulate gyrus | 24 | 10 | −8 | 40 | 3.32 | a |
| Paracentral lobule | 5 | 20 | −42 | 52 | 3.64 | 20 |
| Postcentral gyrus | 3 | 40 | −22 | 46 | 3.56 | 30 |
| Left | ||||||
| Precentral gyrus | 6 | −42 | −10 | 25 | 4.37 | 227 |
| Precuneus | 31 | −20 | −62 | 24 | 4.17 | 107 |
| Superior temporal gyrus | 38 | −46 | 8 | −8 | 4.05 | 34 |
| Thalamus | — | −10 | −7 | 4 | 3.79 | 477 |
| Postcentral gyrus | 1 | −48 | −22 | 54 | 3.64 | 30 |
|
| ||||||
| LI5 group > HT 7 group | ||||||
| NS | — | — | — | — | — | — |
p value is uncorrected at p < 0.001. NS: nonsignificant.
a: an activation area that belongs to the cluster listed above.
HT7: experimental acupoint. LI5: control acupoint.
Figure 3Comparison of AASEA score change between preacupuncture (base line) and postacupuncture period. For male group, the simple main effect of treatment was not significant. In contrast, for female group, the simple main effect of treatment was significant, indicating that the mean change score was higher in the H7 stimulation than in the LI5 stimulation. ∗ indicated p < 0.05.