Literature DB >> 28280294

Assessing the cost burden of United States FDA-mandated post-approval studies for medical devices.

Neil J Wimmer1, Susan Robbins2, Henry Ssemaganda2, Erin Yang2, Sharon-Lise Normand3, Michael E Matheny4, Naomi Herz5, Josh Rising5, Frederic S Resnic6.   

Abstract

Approved medical devices frequently undergo FDA mandated post-approval studies (PAS). However, there is uncertainty as to the value of PAS in assessing the safety of medical devices and the cost of these studies to the healthcare system is unknown. Since PAS costs are funded through device manufacturers who do not share the costs with regulators, we sought to estimate the total PAS costs through interviews with a panel of experts in medical device clinical trial design in order to design a general cost model for PAS which was then applied to the FDA PAS. A total of 277 PAS were initiated between 3/1/05 through 6/30/13 and demonstrated a median cost of $2.16 million per study and an overall cost of $1.22 billion over the 8.25 years of study. While these costs are funded through manufacturers, the ultimate cost is borne by the healthcare system through the medical device costs. Given concerns regarding the informational value of PAS, the resources used to support mandated PAS may be better allocated to other approaches to assure safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28280294      PMCID: PMC5340422     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Finance        ISSN: 1078-6767


  6 in total

Review 1.  Medical device development: from prototype to regulatory approval.

Authors:  Aaron V Kaplan; Donald S Baim; John J Smith; David A Feigal; Michael Simons; David Jefferys; Thomas J Fogarty; Richard E Kuntz; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Postmarketing surveillance of medical devices--filling in the gaps.

Authors:  Frederic S Resnic; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care.

Authors:  John A Spertus; Kim A Eagle; Harlan M Krumholz; Kristi R Mitchell; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Postmarket surveillance for medical devices: America's new strategy.

Authors:  Sharon-Lise T Normand; Laura Hatfield; Joseph Drozda; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-10-11

5.  Assessing the safety and effectiveness of devices after US Food and Drug Administration approval: FDA-mandated postapproval studies.

Authors:  Ian S Reynolds; Joshua P Rising; Allan J Coukell; Kirsten H Paulson; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  Left to their own devices: breakdowns in United States medical device premarket review.

Authors:  Jonas Zajac Hines; Peter Lurie; Eunice Yu; Sidney Wolfe
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 11.069

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Estimated Cost of Developing a Therapeutic Complex Medical Device in the US.

Authors:  Aylin Sertkaya; Rebecca DeVries; Amber Jessup; Trinidad Beleche
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

2.  Use of data from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry to support regulatory decisions yielded a high return on investment.

Authors:  Jack L Cronenwett; Erika Avila-Tang; Adam W Beck; Daniel Bertges; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Frederic S Resnic; Nadezda Radoja; Art Sedrakyan; Andreas Schick; Josh Smale; Roberta A Bloss; Peter Phillips; Melissa Hasenbank; Shengchun Wang; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Gregory Pappas
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2020-10-30

3.  Determining value of Coordinated Registry Networks (CRNs): a case of transcatheter valve therapies.

Authors:  Gregory Pappas; Jesse Berlin; Erika Avila-Tang; John Carroll; Joseph Drozda; Douglas Dumont; Thomas Gross; Kathleen Hewitt; Ajay Kirtane; David Kong; Mitchell Krucoff; John Lashinger; Nellie Lew; Michael Mack; Fred Masoudi; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Roxanna Mehran; Sharon-Lise Normand; Elizabeth Quin; Fred Resnic; Art Sedrakyan; Ronald Waksman; Larry Wood; Changfu Wu; Tianay Ziegler
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2019-07-04

4.  Postmarket surveillance of high-risk medical devices needs transparent, comprehensive and independent registries.

Authors:  Alan G Fraser
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2020-10-30

5.  Authors' response.

Authors:  Jack L Cronenwett; Adam Beck; Daniel Bertges; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2020-10-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.