Literature DB >> 28280216

89Zr-DFO-AMG102 Immuno-PET to Determine Local Hepatocyte Growth Factor Protein Levels in Tumors for Enhanced Patient Selection.

Eric W Price1, Kathryn E Carnazza1, Sean D Carlin1, Andrew Cho1, Kimberly J Edwards1, Kuntal K Sevak1, Jonathan M Glaser1, Elisa de Stanchina2, Yelena Y Janjigian3, Jason S Lewis4,5.   

Abstract

The hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) binding antibody rilotumumab (AMG102) was modified for use as a 89Zr-based immuno-PET imaging agent to noninvasively determine the local levels of HGF protein in tumors. Because recent clinical trials of HGF-targeting therapies have been largely unsuccessful in several different cancers (e.g., gastric, brain, lung), we have synthesized and validated 89Zr-DFO-AMG102 as a companion diagnostic for improved identification and selection of patients having high local levels of HGF in tumors. To date, patient selection has not been performed using the local levels of HGF protein in tumors.
Methods: The chelator p-SCN-Bn-DFO was conjugated to AMG102, radiolabeling with 89Zr was performed in high radiochemical yields and purity (>99%), and binding affinity of the modified antibody was confirmed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-type binding assay. PET imaging, biodistribution, autoradiography and immunohistochemistry, and ex vivo HGF ELISA experiments were performed on murine xenografts of U87MG (HGF-positive, MET-positive) and MKN45 (HGF-negative, MET-positive) and 4 patient-derived xenografts (MET-positive, HGF unknown).
Results: Tumor uptake of 89Zr-DFO-AMG102 at 120 h after injection in U87MG xenografts (HGF-positive) was high (36.8 ± 7.8 percentage injected dose per gram [%ID/g]), whereas uptake in MKN45 xenografts (HGF-negative) was 5.0 ± 1.3 %ID/g and a control of nonspecific human IgG 89Zr-DFO-IgG in U87MG tumors was 11.5 ± 3.3 %ID/g, demonstrating selective uptake in HGF-positive tumors. Similar experiments performed in 4 different gastric cancer patient-derived xenograft models showed low uptake of 89Zr-DFO-AMG102 (∼4-7 %ID/g), which corresponded with low HGF levels in these tumors (ex vivo ELISA). Autoradiography, immunohistochemical staining, and HGF ELISA assays confirmed that elevated levels of HGF protein were present only in U87MG tumors and that 89Zr-DFO-AMG102 uptake was closely correlated with HGF protein levels in tumors.
Conclusion: The new immuno-PET imaging agent 89Zr-DFO-AMG102 was successfully synthesized, radiolabeled, and validated in vitro and in vivo to selectively accumulate in tumors with high local levels of HGF protein. These results suggest that 89Zr-DFO-AMG102 would be a valuable companion diagnostic tool for the noninvasive selection of patients with elevated local concentrations of HGF in tumors for planning any HGF-targeted therapy, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes.
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMG102; HGF; MET; PET; hepatocyte growth factor; patient-derived xenograft; rilotumumab; scatter factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28280216      PMCID: PMC5577625          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.187310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  30 in total

Review 1.  Met, metastasis, motility and more.

Authors:  Carmen Birchmeier; Walter Birchmeier; Ermanno Gherardi; George F Vande Woude
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Scatter factors and invasive growth.

Authors:  P M Comoglio; C Boccaccio
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Association of immunoreactive hepatocyte growth factor with poor survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J M Siegfried; L A Weissfeld; P Singh-Kaw; R J Weyant; J R Testa; R J Landreneau
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Determination of the immunoreactive fraction of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies by linear extrapolation to binding at infinite antigen excess.

Authors:  T Lindmo; E Boven; F Cuttitta; J Fedorko; P A Bunn
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1984-08-03       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Retrogenic expression of the MET proto-oncogene correlates with the invasive phenotype of human rhabdomyosarcomas.

Authors:  R Ferracini; M Olivero; M F Di Renzo; M Martano; C De Giovanni; P Nanni; G Basso; K Scotlandi; P L Lollini; P M Comoglio
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Co-expression of hepatocyte growth factor and c-Met predicts peritoneal dissemination established by autocrine hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met signaling in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Toiyama; Hiromi Yasuda; Susumu Saigusa; Kouhei Matushita; Hiroyuki Fujikawa; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiko Mohri; Yasuhiro Inoue; Ajay Goel; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  A comparison of the imaging characteristics and microregional distribution of 4 hypoxia PET tracers.

Authors:  Sean Carlin; Hanwen Zhang; Megan Reese; Nicholas N Ramos; Qing Chen; Sally-Ann Ricketts
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  The Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor: Structure, Function and Pharmacological Targeting in Cancer.

Authors:  Fabiola Cecchi; Daniel C Rabe; Donald P Bottaro
Journal:  Curr Signal Transduct Ther       Date:  2011

Review 9.  Hepatocyte growth factor, its receptor, and their potential value in cancer therapies.

Authors:  Wen G Jiang; Tracey A Martin; Christian Parr; Gaynor Davies; Kunio Matsumoto; Toshikazu Nakamura
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 10.  Recent Progress and Advances in HGF/MET-Targeted Therapeutic Agents for Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Yilong Zhang; Rajul K Jain; Min Zhu
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2015-03-19
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  PET Imaging of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Cancer.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Dalong Ni; Emily B Ehlerding; Quan-Yong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  ImmunoPET: Antibody-Based PET Imaging in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Reyhaneh Manafi-Farid; Bahar Ataeinia; Shaghayegh Ranjbar; Zahra Jamshidi Araghi; Mohammad Mobin Moradi; Christian Pirich; Mohsen Beheshti
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Zachary T Rosenkrans; Jianjun Liu; Gang Huang; Quan-Yong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  A High-Denticity Chelator Based on Desferrioxamine for Enhanced Coordination of Zirconium-89.

Authors:  Elaheh Khozeimeh Sarbisheh; Akam K Salih; Shvan J Raheem; Jason S Lewis; Eric W Price
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Immuno-PET Molecular Imaging of RANKL in Cancer.

Authors:  Jonatan Dewulf; Christel Vangestel; Yannick Verhoeven; Jorrit De Waele; Karen Zwaenepoel; Peter A van Dam; Filipe Elvas; Tim Van den Wyngaert
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  The Japanese Experience with Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Cutaneous Wound Management and Scar Prevention: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Biological Aspects.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelhakim; Xunxun Lin; Rei Ogawa
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2020-06-06

7.  Tumor-Specific Zr-89 Immuno-PET Imaging in a Human Bladder Cancer Model.

Authors:  Freddy E Escorcia; Jeffrey M Steckler; Dalya Abdel-Atti; Eric W Price; Sean D Carlin; Wolfgang W Scholz; Jason S Lewis; Jacob L Houghton
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  ImmunoPET Predicts Response to Met-targeted Radioligand Therapy in Models of Pancreatic Cancer Resistant to Met Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Freddy E Escorcia; Jacob L Houghton; Dalya Abdel-Atti; Patricia R Pereira; Andrew Cho; Nicholas T Gutsche; Kwamena E Baidoo; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

9.  A Systematic Evaluation of Antibody Modification and 89Zr-Radiolabeling for Optimized Immuno-PET.

Authors:  Sai Kiran Sharma; Jonathan M Glaser; Kimberly J Edwards; Elaheh Khozeimeh Sarbisheh; Akam K Salih; Jason S Lewis; Eric W Price
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.069

Review 10.  Radiochemical Approaches to Imaging Bacterial Infections: Intracellular versus Extracellular Targets.

Authors:  Justin D Northrup; Robert H Mach; Mark A Sellmyer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.