Literature DB >> 28280017

Draft Genome Sequences of Candida glabrata Isolates 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B.

Othilde Elise Håvelsrud1, Peter Gaustad2.   

Abstract

Here, we report the draft genome sequences of six Candida glabrata isolates. The isolates were taken from blood samples from patients after recurrent C. glabrata infection. Two isolates were taken from each of three patients a minimum 3 months apart.
Copyright © 2017 Håvelsrud and Gaustad.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28280017      PMCID: PMC5347237          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00328-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Candida glabrata is an important causal agent of candidemia in humans (1). A recent surveillance study from Norway, where our isolates were collected, identified C. glabrata as the most common causative agent of candidemia after Candida albicans (2). Here, we present the draft genome sequences of six isolates, two each from three patients with recurring candidemia. These draft genome sequences may help ascertain if the recurrent infections were caused by the same strain and whether the strain genomes evolve between infections. They also present a good opportunity for further investigation into the virulence of C. glabrata. DNA was extracted using the YeaStar genomic DNA kit (Zymo Research), according to the manufacturer’s protocol I. The DNA was purified and concentrated using the Amicon Ultra-0.5 ml 30K centrifugal filters for DNA purification and concentration (Merck Millipore). The DNA concentration was determined by the Qubit double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) high-sensitivity (HS) assay kit (Life Technologies). The DNA quality was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and 260/280 ratios measured on a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). Sequencing was performed at the Genomics Core Facility at Radiumhospitalet (http://oslo.genomics.no) using Illumina MiSeq technology. Approximately 15.4, 15.7, 16.3, 24.1, 15.6, and 14.2 million paired-end reads of 101 nucleotides (nt) were generated for C. glabrata isolates 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B, respectively. After removal of read pairs containing ambiguous bases, the reads were assembled with Velvet version 1.2.10 and AMOScmp-shortReads version 3.1.0 (3, 4). VelvetOptimiser was used to set optimal parameter values for the Velvet assemblies. Only contigs >1,000 nt were retained in the Velvet assemblies. C. glabrata CBS138 (5, 6) was used as a reference for the AMOScmp-shortReads assemblies. Feature response curves were created in AMOS version 3.1.10 in order to evaluate assembly quality (4). Contigs from the two assemblies were joined with GAM-NGS version 1.1b using the AMOScmp-shortReads assembly as a master (7). SSPACE version 3.0 was used to scaffold the contigs (8). Both the intermediate contigs and the final scaffolds were validated with REAPR version 1.0.17 (9). mothur 1.36.1 was used to filter out all scaffolds <1,000 nt (10). The final assemblies consist of 12.6 Mbp (119 scaffolds), 12.6 Mbp (144 scaffolds), 14.6 Mbp (196 scaffolds), 12.8 Mbp (132 scaffolds), 12.8 Mbp (189 scaffolds), and 12.9 Mbp (183 scaffolds) for 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B, respectively. The completeness of the assemblies was assessed with CEGMA version 2.4.010312 (11). The draft genome sequences were estimated to be 96 to 97% complete. The average G+C content was 38.6% for all draft genome sequences. The final scaffolds were annotated with MAKER version 2.31 (12). A total of 5,214 (1A), 5,191 (1B), 5,985 (2A), 5,293 (2B), 5,324 (3A), and 5,331 (3B) predicted protein-coding genes were detected. The predicted protein-coding genes cover approximately 65% of the draft genome sequences.

Accession number(s).

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers LLWO00000000, LMAA00000000, LLZZ00000000, LLZY00000000, LMAY00000000, and LMAB00000000 for 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B, respectively. The versions described in this paper are the first versions LLWO01000000, LMAA01000000, LLZZ01000000, LLZY01000000, LMAY01000000, and LMAB01000000, respectively.
  12 in total

1.  Hawkeye and AMOS: visualizing and assessing the quality of genome assemblies.

Authors:  Michael C Schatz; Adam M Phillippy; Daniel D Sommer; Arthur L Delcher; Daniela Puiu; Giuseppe Narzisi; Steven L Salzberg; Mihai Pop
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Genis Parra; Keith Bradnam; Ian Korf
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes.

Authors:  Brandi L Cantarel; Ian Korf; Sofia M C Robb; Genis Parra; Eric Ross; Barry Moore; Carson Holt; Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado; Mark Yandell
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Sarah L Westcott; Thomas Ryabin; Justine R Hall; Martin Hartmann; Emily B Hollister; Ryan A Lesniewski; Brian B Oakley; Donovan H Parks; Courtney J Robinson; Jason W Sahl; Blaz Stres; Gerhard G Thallinger; David J Van Horn; Carolyn F Weber
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia.

Authors:  J Guinea
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  Twenty-two years of candidaemia surveillance: results from a Norwegian national study.

Authors:  L Hesstvedt; P Gaustad; C T Andersen; E Haarr; R Hannula; H H Haukland; N-O Hermansen; K W Larssen; H Mylvaganam; T E Ranheim; P Sandven; I Nordøy; A Kanestrøm; C Grub; A Onken; C Thielsen; D Skaare; S Tofteland; L-J Sønsteby; R Hjetland; R Hide; E Vik; A Kümmel; S Åsheim
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Genome evolution in yeasts.

Authors:  Bernard Dujon; David Sherman; Gilles Fischer; Pascal Durrens; Serge Casaregola; Ingrid Lafontaine; Jacky De Montigny; Christian Marck; Cécile Neuvéglise; Emmanuel Talla; Nicolas Goffard; Lionel Frangeul; Michel Aigle; Véronique Anthouard; Anna Babour; Valérie Barbe; Stéphanie Barnay; Sylvie Blanchin; Jean-Marie Beckerich; Emmanuelle Beyne; Claudine Bleykasten; Anita Boisramé; Jeanne Boyer; Laurence Cattolico; Fabrice Confanioleri; Antoine De Daruvar; Laurence Despons; Emmanuelle Fabre; Cécile Fairhead; Hélène Ferry-Dumazet; Alexis Groppi; Florence Hantraye; Christophe Hennequin; Nicolas Jauniaux; Philippe Joyet; Rym Kachouri; Alix Kerrest; Romain Koszul; Marc Lemaire; Isabelle Lesur; Laurence Ma; Héloïse Muller; Jean-Marc Nicaud; Macha Nikolski; Sophie Oztas; Odile Ozier-Kalogeropoulos; Stefan Pellenz; Serge Potier; Guy-Franck Richard; Marie-Laure Straub; Audrey Suleau; Dominique Swennen; Fredj Tekaia; Micheline Wésolowski-Louvel; Eric Westhof; Bénédicte Wirth; Maria Zeniou-Meyer; Ivan Zivanovic; Monique Bolotin-Fukuhara; Agnès Thierry; Christiane Bouchier; Bernard Caudron; Claude Scarpelli; Claude Gaillardin; Jean Weissenbach; Patrick Wincker; Jean-Luc Souciet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the pathogenic yeast Candida (Torulopsis) glabrata.

Authors:  Romain Koszul; Alain Malpertuy; Lionel Frangeul; Christiane Bouchier; Patrick Wincker; Agnès Thierry; Stéphanie Duthoy; Stéphane Ferris; Christophe Hennequin; Bernard Dujon
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  REAPR: a universal tool for genome assembly evaluation.

Authors:  Martin Hunt; Taisei Kikuchi; Mandy Sanders; Chris Newbold; Matthew Berriman; Thomas D Otto
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  3 in total

1.  New Locus for Candida glabrata Sequence-Based Strain Typing Provides Evidence for Nosocomial Transmission.

Authors:  Santosh Katiyar; Tom Edlind
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparative Genomics of Two Sequential Candida glabrata Clinical Isolates.

Authors:  Luis Vale-Silva; Emmanuel Beaudoing; Van Du T Tran; Dominique Sanglard
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Patterns of Genomic Variation in the Opportunistic Pathogen Candida glabrata Suggest the Existence of Mating and a Secondary Association with Humans.

Authors:  Laia Carreté; Ewa Ksiezopolska; Cinta Pegueroles; Emilia Gómez-Molero; Ester Saus; Susana Iraola-Guzmán; Damian Loska; Oliver Bader; Cecile Fairhead; Toni Gabaldón
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 10.900

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.