Jun Zhang1, Carolyn G Begley2, Ping Situ1, Trefford Simpson3, Haixia Liu4. 1. Indiana University, School of Optometry, Bloomington, IN, USA. 2. Indiana University, School of Optometry, Bloomington, IN, USA. Electronic address: cbegley@indiana.edu. 3. University of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 4. Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We used the presence or absence of a soft contact lens (CL) as a barrier to test the hypothesis that tear breakup (TBU) presents a direct noxious stimulus to the ocular surface. METHODS: Ten subjects kept one eye open as long as possible, termed sustained tear exposure (STARE), for 10 consecutive trials while discomfort was monitored with and without a CL in place. The area of TBU was quantified in each frame. Discomfort was measured during and after each STARE trial and symptoms of ocular irritation were assessed before and after all testing. RESULTS: TBU increased at the end of trials to an average of 19.89% ± 17.91% and 20.58% ± 15.33% and discomfort to 9.09 ± 1.44 and 1.97 ± 2.19 in trials without and with a CL, respectively. Discomfort was significantly higher during trials without CLs (Friedman test, p < 0.005), but there was no significant difference in the area of TBU between trials (Friedman test, p = 0.296) with and without a CL (Friedman test, p = 0.527). Discomfort after each STARE trial increased significantly across trials (Friedman, p < 0.005). Symptoms of ocular irritation increased significantly from pre- to post-testing (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: TBU during STARE trials was associated with increasing ocular discomfort, which was partially blocked by wearing a CL, supporting the hypothesis that TBU directly stimulates the corneal surface. Repeated STARE trials led to increasing discomfort and dry-eye like symptoms of ocular irritation, suggesting that repeated bouts of TBU can lead to alterations in ocular surface sensory processing.
PURPOSE: We used the presence or absence of a soft contact lens (CL) as a barrier to test the hypothesis that tear breakup (TBU) presents a direct noxious stimulus to the ocular surface. METHODS: Ten subjects kept one eye open as long as possible, termed sustained tear exposure (STARE), for 10 consecutive trials while discomfort was monitored with and without a CL in place. The area of TBU was quantified in each frame. Discomfort was measured during and after each STARE trial and symptoms of ocular irritation were assessed before and after all testing. RESULTS:TBU increased at the end of trials to an average of 19.89% ± 17.91% and 20.58% ± 15.33% and discomfort to 9.09 ± 1.44 and 1.97 ± 2.19 in trials without and with a CL, respectively. Discomfort was significantly higher during trials without CLs (Friedman test, p < 0.005), but there was no significant difference in the area of TBU between trials (Friedman test, p = 0.296) with and without a CL (Friedman test, p = 0.527). Discomfort after each STARE trial increased significantly across trials (Friedman, p < 0.005). Symptoms of ocular irritation increased significantly from pre- to post-testing (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS:TBU during STARE trials was associated with increasing ocular discomfort, which was partially blocked by wearing a CL, supporting the hypothesis that TBU directly stimulates the corneal surface. Repeated STARE trials led to increasing discomfort and dry-eye like symptoms of ocular irritation, suggesting that repeated bouts of TBU can lead to alterations in ocular surface sensory processing.
Authors: Ingrid Astrid Jiménez Barbosa; Martha Fabiola Rodríguez Alvarez; Gerardo Andrés Dussán Torres; Sieu K Khuu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240