E A Matthews1, J Magid-Bernstein1, A Presciutti1, A Rodriguez1, D Roh1, S Park1, J Claassen1, S Agarwal2. 1. Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States. 2. Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: sa2512@columbia.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most cardiac arrest (CA) patients remain comatose post-resuscitation, prompting goals-of-care (GOC) conversations. The impact of these conversations on patient outcomes has not been well described. METHODS: Patients (n=385) treated for CA in Columbia University ICUs between 2008-2015 were retrospectively categorized into various modes of survival and death based on documented GOC discussions. Patients were deemed "medically unstable" if there was evidence of hemodynamic instability at the time of discussion. Cerebral performance category (CPC) greater than 2 was defined as poor outcome at discharge and one-year post-arrest. RESULTS: The survival rate was 31% (n=118); most commonly after early recovery without any discussions (57%, n=67), followed by survival due to family wishes despite physicians predicting poor neurological prognosis (20%, n=24), and then survival after physician/family agreement of favorable prognosis (17%, n=20). The survivors due to family wishes had significantly worse outcomes compared to the early recovery group (discharge: p=0.01; one-year: p=0.06) and agreement group (p<0.001; p<0.001), though 2 patients did achieve favorable recovery. Among nonsurvivors (n=267), withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) while medically unstable was most common (31%; n=83), followed by death after care was capped (24%, n=65), then WLST while medically stable (17%, n=45). Death despite full support, brain death and WLST due to advanced directives were less common causes. CONCLUSIONS: Most survivors due to family wishes despite poor neurological prognosis die or have poor outcomes at one-year. However, a small number achieve favorable recovery, demonstrating limitations with current prognostication methods. Among nonsurvivors, most WLST occurs while medically unstable, suggesting an overestimation of WLST due to unfavorable neurological prognosis.
BACKGROUND: Most cardiac arrest (CA) patients remain comatose post-resuscitation, prompting goals-of-care (GOC) conversations. The impact of these conversations on patient outcomes has not been well described. METHODS:Patients (n=385) treated for CA in Columbia University ICUs between 2008-2015 were retrospectively categorized into various modes of survival and death based on documented GOC discussions. Patients were deemed "medically unstable" if there was evidence of hemodynamic instability at the time of discussion. Cerebral performance category (CPC) greater than 2 was defined as poor outcome at discharge and one-year post-arrest. RESULTS: The survival rate was 31% (n=118); most commonly after early recovery without any discussions (57%, n=67), followed by survival due to family wishes despite physicians predicting poor neurological prognosis (20%, n=24), and then survival after physician/family agreement of favorable prognosis (17%, n=20). The survivors due to family wishes had significantly worse outcomes compared to the early recovery group (discharge: p=0.01; one-year: p=0.06) and agreement group (p<0.001; p<0.001), though 2 patients did achieve favorable recovery. Among nonsurvivors (n=267), withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) while medically unstable was most common (31%; n=83), followed by death after care was capped (24%, n=65), then WLST while medically stable (17%, n=45). Death despite full support, brain death and WLST due to advanced directives were less common causes. CONCLUSIONS: Most survivors due to family wishes despite poor neurological prognosis die or have poor outcomes at one-year. However, a small number achieve favorable recovery, demonstrating limitations with current prognostication methods. Among nonsurvivors, most WLST occurs while medically unstable, suggesting an overestimation of WLST due to unfavorable neurological prognosis.
Authors: Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jonathan Elmer; Cesar Torres; Tom P Aufderheide; Michael A Austin; Clifton W Callaway; Eyal Golan; Heather Herren; Jamie Jasti; Peter J Kudenchuk; Damon C Scales; Dion Stub; Derek K Richardson; Dana M Zive Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Sachin Agarwal; Alex Presciutti; William Roth; Elizabeth Matthews; Ashley Rodriguez; David J Roh; Soojin Park; Jan Claassen; Ronald M Lazar Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Julia M Carlson; Eric Etchill; Glenn Whitman; Bo Soo Kim; Chun Woo Choi; Joseph E Tonna; Romergryko Geocadin; Sung-Min Cho Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Jerry P Nolan; Claudio Sandroni; Bernd W Böttiger; Alain Cariou; Tobias Cronberg; Hans Friberg; Cornelia Genbrugge; Kirstie Haywood; Gisela Lilja; Véronique R M Moulaert; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Theresa Mariero Olasveengen; Markus B Skrifvars; Fabio Taccone; Jasmeet Soar Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Julia M Carlson; Eric W Etchill; Clare Angeli G Enriquez; Anna Peeler; Glenn J Whitman; Chun Woo Choi; Romergryko G Geocadin; Sung-Min Cho Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Simon Mölström; Troels Halfeld Nielsen; Carl H Nordström; Christian Hassager; Jacob Eifer Møller; Jesper Kjærgaard; Sören Möller; Henrik Schmidt; Palle Toft Journal: Trials Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 2.279