Tejesh Gupta Garlapati1, Jogikalmat Krithikadatta2, Velmurugan Natanasabapathy3. 1. Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maduravoyal, Chennai, 600095, India. Electronic address: tejjo89@gmail.com. 2. Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maduravoyal, Chennai, 600095, India. Electronic address: drkrithikadatta@hotmail.com. 3. Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maduravoyal, Chennai, 600095, India. Electronic address: vel9911@yahoo.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This in-vitro study tested the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars with Mesial-Occluso-Distal (MOD) cavities restored with fibre reinforced composite material everX posterior in comparision with hybrid composite and ribbond fiber composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty intact freshly extracted human mandibular first molars were collected and were randomly divided into five groups (n=10). Group 1: positive control (PC) intact teeth without any endodontic preparation. In groups 2 through 6 after endodontic procedure standard MOD cavities were prepared and restored with their respective core materials as follows: group 2, negative control (NC) left unrestored or temporary flling was applied. Group 3, Hybrid composite (HC) as a core material (Te-Econom Plus Ivoclar Vivadent Asia) group 4, Ribbond (Ribbond; Seattle, WA, USA)+conventional composite resin (RCR) group 5, everX posterior (everX Posterior GC EUROPE)+conventional composite resin (EXP) after thermocycling fracture resistance for the samples were tested using universal testing machine. The results were analysed using ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc tests. RESULTS: Mean fracture resistance (in Newton, N) was group 1: 1568.4±221.71N, group 2: 891.0±50.107N, group 3: 1418.3±168.71N, group 4:1716.7±199.51N and group 5: 1994.8±254.195N. CONCLUSION: Among the materials tested, endodontically treated teeth restored with everX posterior fiber reinforced composite showed superior fracture resistance.
PURPOSE: This in-vitro study tested the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars with Mesial-Occluso-Distal (MOD) cavities restored with fibre reinforced composite material everX posterior in comparision with hybrid composite and ribbond fiber composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty intact freshly extracted human mandibular first molars were collected and were randomly divided into five groups (n=10). Group 1: positive control (PC) intact teeth without any endodontic preparation. In groups 2 through 6 after endodontic procedure standard MOD cavities were prepared and restored with their respective core materials as follows: group 2, negative control (NC) left unrestored or temporary flling was applied. Group 3, Hybrid composite (HC) as a core material (Te-Econom Plus Ivoclar Vivadent Asia) group 4, Ribbond (Ribbond; Seattle, WA, USA)+conventional composite resin (RCR) group 5, everX posterior (everX Posterior GC EUROPE)+conventional composite resin (EXP) after thermocycling fracture resistance for the samples were tested using universal testing machine. The results were analysed using ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc tests. RESULTS: Mean fracture resistance (in Newton, N) was group 1: 1568.4±221.71N, group 2: 891.0±50.107N, group 3: 1418.3±168.71N, group 4:1716.7±199.51N and group 5: 1994.8±254.195N. CONCLUSION: Among the materials tested, endodontically treated teeth restored with everX posterior fiber reinforced composite showed superior fracture resistance.