Christos Baliatsas1, Floor Borlée2, Christel E van Dijk3, Baukje van der Star3, Jan-Paul Zock3, Lidwien A M Smit4, Peter Spreeuwenberg3, Dick Heederik4, C Joris Yzermans3. 1. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: c.baliatsas@nivel.nl. 2. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) constitute a potentially susceptible group towards environmental exposures such as livestock farm emissions, given their compromised respiratory health status. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between livestock exposure and comorbidities and coexisting symptoms and infections in COPD patients. METHODS: Data were collected from 1828 COPD patients (without co-occurring asthma) registered in 23 general practices and living in a rural area with a high livestock density. Prevalence of comorbid diseases/disorders and coexisting symptoms/infections were based on electronic health records from the year 2012. Various indicators of individual exposure to livestock were estimated based on residential addresses, using a geographic information system. RESULTS: At least one comorbid disorder was present in 69% of the COPD patients (especially cardiac disorders and depression, while 49% had at least one coexisting symptom and/or infection (especially upper respiratory tract infections, respiratory symptoms and pneumonia). Half of the COPD-patients resided less than 500m of the nearest farm. Some positive as well as inverse associations were found between the examined outcomes and exposure estimates, although not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high prevalence of coexisting chronic and acute conditions presented in primary care by in COPD patients, this investigation found no convincing evidence for an association with livestock exposure estimates. There is a need for a replication of the present findings in studies with a longitudinal design, on different groups of potentially susceptible patients. Future research should also elucidate the biological plausibility of possible protective effects of exposure.
OBJECTIVES:Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) constitute a potentially susceptible group towards environmental exposures such as livestock farm emissions, given their compromised respiratory health status. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between livestock exposure and comorbidities and coexisting symptoms and infections in COPDpatients. METHODS: Data were collected from 1828 COPDpatients (without co-occurring asthma) registered in 23 general practices and living in a rural area with a high livestock density. Prevalence of comorbid diseases/disorders and coexisting symptoms/infections were based on electronic health records from the year 2012. Various indicators of individual exposure to livestock were estimated based on residential addresses, using a geographic information system. RESULTS: At least one comorbid disorder was present in 69% of the COPDpatients (especially cardiac disorders and depression, while 49% had at least one coexisting symptom and/or infection (especially upper respiratory tract infections, respiratory symptoms and pneumonia). Half of the COPD-patients resided less than 500m of the nearest farm. Some positive as well as inverse associations were found between the examined outcomes and exposure estimates, although not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high prevalence of coexisting chronic and acute conditions presented in primary care by in COPDpatients, this investigation found no convincing evidence for an association with livestock exposure estimates. There is a need for a replication of the present findings in studies with a longitudinal design, on different groups of potentially susceptible patients. Future research should also elucidate the biological plausibility of possible protective effects of exposure.
Authors: Pim M Post; Lenny Hogerwerf; Anke Huss; Ronald Petie; Gert Jan Boender; Christos Baliatsas; Erik Lebret; Dick Heederik; Thomas J Hagenaars; C Joris IJzermans; Lidwien A M Smit Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christos Baliatsas; Lidwien A M Smit; Michel L A Dückers; Christel E van Dijk; Dick Heederik; C Joris Yzermans Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Arzu Ulu; Jalene V Velazquez; Abigail Burr; Stefanie N Sveiven; Jun Yang; Carissa Bravo; Bruce D Hammock; Tara M Nordgren Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 5.810