Literature DB >> 28279428

Nadroparin or fondaparinux versus no thromboprophylaxis in patients immobilised in a below-knee plaster cast (PROTECT): A randomised controlled trial.

Marlieke M Bruntink1, Yannick M E Groutars2, Inger B Schipper3, Roelf S Breederveld4, Wim E Tuinebreijer5, Robert J Derksen6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The immobilisation of the lower leg is associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, thromboprophylaxis in patients with a below-knee plaster cast remains controversial. We examined the efficacy and safety of nadroparin and fondaparinux to ascertain the need for thromboprophylaxis in these patients.
METHODS: PROTECT was a randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre study that enrolled adults with an ankle or foot fracture who required immobilisation for a minimum of four weeks. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to a control group (no thromboprophylaxis) or to one of the intervention groups: daily subcutaneous self-injection of either nadroparin (2850 IE anti-Xa=0.3ml) or fondaparinux (2.5mg=0.5ml). A venous duplex sonography was performed after the removal of the cast or earlier if thrombosis was suspected. The primary outcome was the relative risk of developing DVT in the control group compared with that in both intervention groups. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00881088.
RESULTS: Between April 2009 and December 2015, 467 patients were enrolled and assigned to either the nadroparin group (n=154), the fondaparinux group (n=157), or the control group (n=156). A total of 273 patients (92, 92, and 94 patients, respectively) were analysed. The incidence of DVT in the nadroparin group was 2/92 (2.2%) compared with 11/94 (11.7%) in the control group, with a relative risk of 5.4 (95% CI 1.2-23.6; p=0.011). The incidence of DVT in the fondaparinux group was 1/92 (1.1%), yielding a relative risk of 10.8 (95% CI 1.4-80.7; p=0.003) compared with that in the control group. No major complications occurred in any group.
CONCLUSION: Thromboprophylaxis with nadroparin or fondaparinux significantly reduces the risk of DVT in patients with an ankle or foot fracture who were treated in a below-knee cast without any major adverse events.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep vein thrombosis; Fracture; Lower leg immobilisation; Thromboprophylaxis; Venous thromboembolic event

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28279428     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  8 in total

1.  Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Abdullah Pandor; Daniel Horner; Sarah Davis; Steve Goodacre; John W Stevens; Mark Clowes; Beverley J Hunt; Tim Nokes; Jonathan Keenan; Kerstin de Wit
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with lower-limb immobilization.

Authors:  Aniek Ag Zee; Kelly van Lieshout; Maaike van der Heide; Loes Janssen; Heinrich Mj Janzing
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-06

3.  Qualitative analysis of randomized controlled trials informing recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after distal lower extremity injuries.

Authors:  Aaron J Folsom; Michael M Polmear; John P Scanaliato; John C Dunn; Adam H Adler; Justin D Orr
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-03-18

Review 4.  Thromboprophylaxis in lower limb immobilisation after injury (TiLLI).

Authors:  Daniel Horner; Steve Goodacre; Abdullah Pandor; Timothy Nokes; Jonathan Keenan; Beverley Hunt; Sarah Davis; John W Stevens; Kerstin Hogg
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Prevention of venous thromboembolic events in patients with lower leg immobilization after trauma: Systematic review and network meta-analysis with meta-epsidemiological approach.

Authors:  D Douillet; C Chapelle; E Ollier; P Mismetti; P-M Roy; S Laporte
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 11.613

Review 6.  Characteristics of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Isolated Lower Extremity Fractures and Unsolved Problems in Guidelines: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Wei-Guang Zhao; Wei-Li Zhang; Ying-Ze Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with temporary lower limb immobilization after injury: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Horner; John W Stevens; Abdullah Pandor; Tim Nokes; Jonathan Keenan; Kerstin de Wit; Steve Goodacre
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 5.824

8.  Clinical risk assessment model to predict venous thromboembolism risk after immobilization for lower-limb trauma.

Authors:  Banne Nemeth; Delphine Douillet; Saskia le Cessie; Andrea Penaloza; Thomas Moumneh; Pierre-Marie Roy; Suzanne Cannegieter
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-02-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.