Literature DB >> 28279289

Changes in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Deemed "Inappropriate" by Appropriate Use Criteria.

Edward L Hannan1, Zaza Samadashvili2, Kimberly Cozzens2, Foster Gesten3, Alda Osinaga4, Douglas G Fish4, Constance L Donahue4, Ronald J Bass4, Gary Walford5, Alice K Jacobs6, Ferdinand J Venditti7, Nicholas J Stamato8, Peter B Berger9, Samin Sharma10, Spencer B King11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated relatively high rates of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) classified as "inappropriate." The New York State Department of Health shared rates with hospitals and announced the intention of withholding reimbursement pending demonstration of clinical rationale for Medicaid patients with inappropriate PCIs.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine changes over time in the number and rate of inappropriate PCIs.
METHODS: Appropriate use criteria were applied to PCIs performed in New York in patients without acute coronary syndromes or previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery in periods before (2010 through 2011) and after (2012 through 2014) efforts were made to decrease inappropriateness rates. Changes in the number of appropriate PCIs were also assessed.
RESULTS: The percentage of inappropriate PCIs for all patients dropped from 18.2% in 2010 to 10.6% in 2014 (from 15.3% to 6.8% for Medicaid patients, and from 18.6% to 11.2% for other patients). The total number of PCIs in patients with no acute coronary syndrome/no prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery that were rated as inappropriate decreased from 2,956 patients in 2010 to 911 patients in 2014, a reduction of 69%. For Medicaid patients, the decrease was from 340 patients to 84 patients, a decrease of 75%. For a select set of higher-risk scenarios, there were higher numbers of appropriate PCIs per year in the period from 2012 to 2014.
CONCLUSIONS: The inappropriateness rate for PCIs and the use of PCI for elective procedures in New York has decreased substantially between 2010 and 2014. This decrease has occurred for a large proportion of PCI hospitals.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Reporting System; revascularization; stable coronary artery disease

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28279289     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  4 in total

1.  Trends in Coded Indications for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Medicare and the Veterans Affairs After Implementation of Hospital-Level Reporting of Appropriate Use Criteria.

Authors:  Elias J Dayoub; Ashwin S Nathan; Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Rishi K Wadhera; Daniel M Kolansky; Robert W Yeh; Jay Giri; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 2.  Critical appraisal of cardiology guidelines on revascularisation: clinical practice.

Authors:  David R Dobies; Kimberly R Barber
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-02-24

3.  Three-dimensional QCA-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) in Heart Team decision-making: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.

Authors:  Mariusz Tomaniak; Kaneshka Masdjedi; Tara Neleman; Ibrahim T Kucuk; Alise Vermaire; Laurens J C van Zandvoort; Nick Van Boven; Bas M van Dalen; Loe Kie Soei; Wijnand K den Dekker; Isabella Kardys; Jeroen M Wilschut; Roberto Diletti; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Joost Daemen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Revascularization outcomes in diabetic patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome with non-ST elevation.

Authors:  Eilon Ram; Enrique Z Fisman; Alexander Tenenbaum; Zaza Iakobishvili; Yael Peled; Ehud Raanani; Leonid Sternik
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 8.949

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.