Literature DB >> 28279257

Approaches for triaging women who test positive for human papillomavirus in cervical cancer screening.

Joseph E Tota1, James Bentley2, Jennifer Blake3, François Coutlée4, Máire A Duggan5, Alex Ferenczy6, Eduardo L Franco7, Michael Fung-Kee-Fung8, Walter Gotlieb9, Marie-Hélène Mayrand10, Meg McLachlin11, Joan Murphy12, Gina Ogilvie13, Sam Ratnam14.   

Abstract

Substantial evidence exists to support the introduction of molecular testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) as the primary technology in cervical cancer screening. While HPV testing is much more sensitive than cytology for detection of high-grade precancerous lesions, it is less specific. To improve efficiency, it is therefore recommended that a specific test (like cytology) be used in triaging HPV positive women to colposcopy. A number of studies have been conducted that support the use of cytology alone or in conjunction with HPV genotyping for triage. The decision to incorporate genotyping also depends on the commercial HPV test that is selected since not all tests provide results for certain individual high-risk types. Regardless of whether policy officials decide to adopt a triage approach that incorporates genotyping, the use of liquid based cytology (LBC) may also improve screening performance by reducing diagnostic delays. With LBC, the same cell suspension from a single collection may be used for HPV testing and a smear can be immediately prepared if HPV status is positive. This was a critical lesson from a community based demonstration project in Montreal (VASCAR study), where conventional cytology exists and specimen co-collection was not permitted for ethical reasons, requiring HPV positive women to return for an additional screening visit prior to colposcopy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; HPV testing; Screening; Triage

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28279257     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  18 in total

1.  Cervical cancer screening: Epidemiology as the necessary but not sufficient basis of public health practice.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Human Papillomavirus DNA Methylation as a Biomarker for Cervical Precancer: Consistency across 12 Genotypes and Potential Impact on Management of HPV-Positive Women.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Ana Gradissimo; Nicolas Wentzensen; Robert D Burk; Mark Schiffman; Jessica Lam; Christopher C Sollecito; Barbara Fetterman; Thomas Lorey; Nancy Poitras; Tina R Raine-Bennett; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  HPV-based cervical cancer screening- facts, fiction, and misperceptions.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  The time is now to implement HPV testing for primary screening in low resource settings.

Authors:  Louise Kuhn; Lynette Denny
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: Empowering women to lead a paradigm change in cancer control.

Authors:  E L Franco
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.

Authors:  Satomi Aoyama-Kikawa; Hiromasa Fujita; Sharon J B Hanley; Mitsunori Kasamo; Kokichi Kikuchi; Toshihiko Torigoe; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Akiko Tamakoshi; Takayuki Sasaki; Motoki Matsuura; Yasuhito Kato; Peixin Dong; Hidemichi Watari; Tsuyoshi Saito; Kazuo Sengoku; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  Performance of clinical screening algorithms comprising point-of-care HPV-DNA testing using self-collected vaginal specimens, and visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid, for the detection of underlying high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Pamela J Toliman; John M Kaldor; Steven G Badman; Josephine Gabuzzi; Selina Silim; Antonia Kumbia; Benny Kombuk; Zure Kombati; Gloria Munnull; Rebecca Guy; Lisa M Vallely; Angela Kelly-Hanku; Handan Wand; Claire Ryan; Grace Tan; Julia Brotherton; Marion Saville; Glen D L Mola; Suzanne M Garland; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Andrew J Vallely
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2018-11-01

8.  Identification and performance evaluation of housekeeping genes for microRNA expression normalization by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR using liquid-based cervical cytology samples.

Authors:  Rhafaela Lima Causin; Danielle Pessôa-Pereira; Karen Cristina Borba Souza; Adriane Feijó Evangelista; Rui Manuel Vieira Reis; José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani; Márcia Maria Chiquitelli Marques
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Bayesian analysis of baseline risk of CIN2 and ≥CIN3 by HPV genotype in a European referral cohort.

Authors:  Jesper Bonde; Fabio Bottari; Valentin Parvu; Helle Pedersen; Karen Yanson; Anna D Iacobone; Salma Kodsi; Fabio Landoni; Laurence Vaughan; Ditte M Ejegod; Maria T Sandri
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Persistence of cervical high-risk human papillomavirus in women living with HIV in Denmark - the SHADE.

Authors:  Kristina Thorsteinsson; Steen Ladelund; Merete Storgaard; Terese L Katzenstein; Isik Somuncu Johansen; Gitte Pedersen; Frederikke Falkencrone Rönsholt; Lars Nørregård Nielsen; Lisbeth Nilas; Maria Franzmann; Niels Obel; Anne-Mette Lebech; Jesper Bonde
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.