| Literature DB >> 28279211 |
Yi Zhang1, Zhongliang Zhou2, Yafei Si3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: China has a large population of children under 18 years of age, whose health is of great concern to the Chinese health care system. However, few studies have been conducted to analyze the factors associated with children's unnecessary health care utilization in China. The objective of this study is to provide some empirical evidence on this issue by investigating the role of parental health care utilization in children's unnecessary health care use.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Health care; Parents; Utilization
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28279211 PMCID: PMC5345193 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-017-0544-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Equity Health ISSN: 1475-9276
Description of dependent variables
| Dependent variable | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Outpatient visit | An outpatient visit was defined in the survey as a patient visit to hospital outpatient facilities in a day and included pharmaceuticals, physician visits, and outpatient surgery (excluding routine well-child visits such as general checkups and immunizations). The leading causes of outpatient visits among the surveyed children in the past 2 weeks were: common cold, upper respiratory tract infection, and influenza. |
| Infusion | The infusion variable was identified as being conditional on having an outpatient visit. The leading causes of obtaining infusion during outpatient visits in the past 2 weeks were: upper respiratory tract infection, common cold, and influenza. |
| Inpatient visit | An inpatient visit was defined as a patient visit which resulted in overnight hospitalization. The leading causes of inpatient visits among the surveyed children in the last year included: upper respiratory tract infection, pneumonia, and acute nasopharyngitis. |
Note: Following previous studies on the utilization of health care services, self-reported responses were used in this study. The period of recall was 2 weeks for outpatient utilization and one year for inpatient utilization in the NHSS. Although one disadvantage of using self-reported data is that they are subject to reporting bias, using a relatively short recall period would help reduce the likelihood of recall error [64]
Description of independent variables
| Independent variable | Explanation | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Parental health care utilization | 1. Parental outpatient visit: The paired parent used outpatient services in the past 2 weeks (Yes = 1, No = 0) | Binary instead of count variables were employed, since only 1.71% of the surveyed parents used outpatient services more than once in the past 2 weeks and 0.46% used inpatient services more than once in the last year. |
| Parental socioeconomic level | Per capita household expenditure last year (five equal quantiles for the poorest, poor, average, rich, and the richest) | It has shown to be a better proxy for resources available than self-reported income which is more likely to be misreported [ |
| Children’s health insurance | A child was covered by any insurance scheme (Yes = 1, No = 0) | Among the surveyed children, 91.6% of the urban children were covered by URBMI and 96.9%% of the rural children were covered by NCMS. Since whether a child was under URBMI or NCMS depended on his/her residential area controlled later, we used an indicator variable for insurance status instead of specifying different insurance schemes. |
| Children’s need for care | 1. Days of illness if a child was reported to have any illnesses or injuries in the past 2 weeks | We used the days of illness to indicate the severity of the illness and therefore the need for health care services. As the recall period for the days of illness was 2 weeks, this variable was not able to be taken into account in the analysis of the use of inpatient services in the last year. |
| Parental need for care | Days of illness if the parent was reported to have any illnesses or injuries in the past 2 weeks | Due to time inconsistency, this variable was not used in the inpatient model. |
| Children’s age | Grouped into 0–2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–11, 12–14, 15–17 years | |
| Children’s gender | Male or female | |
| Children’s ethnicity | Han or others | |
| Parental age | Parental age in the survey year | |
| Residential areas | Urban or rural | |
| Living region | Shanbei (north), Guanzhong (central), and Shannan (south) | |
| Family size | The number of members in a family |
Note: Though parental education has been shown to be associated with children’s health care utilization in some previous studies [17, 22], we did not include this variable as it was highly correlated with parental income in our sample
Descriptive statistics for variables
| Variable | Number | Mean (S.D.) or % |
|---|---|---|
| Number of children’s outpatient visit | 11,024 | 0.0907 (0.4173) |
| 0 | 10,322 | 93.63 |
| 1 | 526 | 4.77 |
| 2 | 101 | 0.92 |
| 3 and more | 75 | 0.68 |
| Children’s infusion use (yes or no) | ||
| No | 432 | 61.54 |
| Yes | 270 | 38.46 |
| Number of children’s inpatient visit | 11,024 | 0.0788 (0.3844) |
| 0 | 10,407 | 94.4 |
| 1 | 468 | 4.25 |
| 2 | 82 | 0.74 |
| 3 and more | 67 | 0.61 |
| Parental outpatient visit | ||
| Noa | 10,059 | 94.04 |
| Yes | 637 | 5.96 |
| Parental infusion use | ||
| Noa | 403 | 63.27 |
| Yes | 234 | 36.73 |
| Parental inpatient visit | ||
| Noa | 9,385 | 93.05 |
| Yes | 701 | 6.95 |
| Parental days of illness | 10696 | 0.9204 (3.0819) |
| Parental age | 10696 | 34.15 (12.75) |
| Per capita household expense | ||
| Pooresta | 2,208 | 2628 (737) |
| Poor | 2,206 | 4503 (470) |
| Average | 2,230 | 6291 (570) |
| Rich | 2,186 | 8752 (938) |
| Richest | 2,205 | 16207 (6686) |
| Children’s insurance | ||
| Noa | 560 | 5.09 |
| Yes | 10,448 | 94.91 |
| Children’s days of illness | 11035 | 0.4417 (1.8273) |
| Children’s height (cm) | 10986 | 125.12 (34.24) |
| Children’s weight (kg) | 10985 | 32.49 (17.20) |
| Children’s age | ||
| 0-2a | 1,992 | 18.07 |
| 3–5 | 1,941 | 17.61 |
| 6–8 | 1,650 | 14.97 |
| 9–11 | 1,527 | 13.85 |
| 12–14 | 1,700 | 15.42 |
| 15–18 | 2,214 | 20.08 |
| Gender | ||
| Femalea | 5,153 | 46.7 |
| Male | 5,882 | 53.3 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Othersa | 191 | 1.73 |
| Han | 10,842 | 98.27 |
| Residential area | ||
| Rurala | 6,856 | 62.13 |
| Urban | 4,179 | 37.87 |
| Region | ||
| Shannana | 4,074 | 36.92 |
| Guanzhong | 5,100 | 46.22 |
| Shanbei | 1,861 | 16.86 |
| Family size | 11035 | 4.01 (1.15) |
Note: “Number” represents the number of observations of a variable
aReference levels in the regressions; Outpatient visits and infusion in the past 2 weeks; Inpatient visits in the last year
Fig. 1Average number of children’s outpatient visit when parents used/did not use outpatient services in the past 2 weeks
Fig. 2Average probability of children’s infusion use during outpatient visits when parents obtained/did not obtain infusion during outpatient visits
Fig. 3Average number of children’s inpatient visit when parents used/did not use inpatient services in the last year
Negative binomial regression results on the use of outpatient services in the past 2 weeks
| Number of children’s outpatient visit in the last 2 weeks (marginal effect reported) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Full sample | (2) Age 0–5 | (3) Age 6–11 | (4) Age 12–18 | |||||||||||||
| dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | |||||
| Parents had outpatient visit | 0.0393a | 0.0106 | 0.0186 | 0.0600 | 0.0980a | 0.0306 | 0.0381 | 0.1579 | 0.0170 | 0.0146 | −0.0117 | 0.0457 | 0.0179c | 0.0107 | −0.0031 | 0.0390 |
| Per capita household expense | ||||||||||||||||
| Poor | −0.0010 | 0.0036 | −0.0080 | 0.0061 | 0.0057 | 0.0099 | −0.0138 | 0.0251 | 0.0007 | 0.0061 | −0.0113 | 0.0127 | −0.0051c | 0.0031 | −0.0111 | 0.0008 |
| Average | −0.0023 | 0.0036 | −0.0094 | 0.0048 | −0.0048 | 0.0091 | −0.0228 | 0.0131 | 0.0003 | 0.0065 | −0.0124 | 0.0129 | −0.0031 | 0.0038 | −0.0106 | 0.0044 |
| Rich | −0.0016 | 0.0036 | −0.0087 | 0.0055 | 0.0040 | 0.0107 | −0.0170 | 0.0251 | −0.0079 | 0.0053 | −0.0183 | 0.0025 | −0.0024 | 0.0037 | −0.0096 | 0.0048 |
| Richest | −0.0002 | 0.0039 | −0.0078 | 0.0075 | 0.0111 | 0.0118 | −0.0119 | 0.0342 | −0.0086 | 0.0062 | −0.0207 | 0.0034 | 0.0008 | 0.0044 | −0.0078 | 0.0094 |
| Children had insurance | 0.0005 | 0.0040 | −0.0074 | 0.0084 | 0.0000 | 0.0098 | −0.0191 | 0.0192 | −0.0090 | 0.0116 | −0.0318 | 0.0137 | 0.0174a | 0.0025 | 0.0125 | 0.0224 |
| Children’s days of illness | 0.0133a | 0.0008 | 0.0118 | 0.0147 | 0.0241a | 0.0013 | 0.0216 | 0.0267 | 0.0122a | 0.0013 | 0.0096 | 0.0148 | 0.0045a | 0.0005 | 0.0035 | 0.0055 |
| Children’s height (ln) | 0.0034 | 0.0074 | −0.0110 | 0.0179 | 0.0128 | 0.0163 | −0.0191 | 0.0447 | −0.0156 | 0.0175 | −0.0498 | 0.0187 | 0.0047 | 0.0142 | −0.0231 | 0.0326 |
| Children’s weight (ln) | −0.0010 | 0.0039 | −0.0086 | 0.0066 | −0.0053 | 0.0083 | −0.0215 | 0.0109 | 0.0108 | 0.0087 | −0.0062 | 0.0279 | −0.0051 | 0.0072 | −0.0191 | 0.0090 |
| Prenatal days of illness | −0.0013b | 0.0005 | −0.0023 | −0.0002 | −0.0033b | 0.0015 | −0.0062 | −0.0004 | −0.0001 | 0.0008 | −0.0016 | 0.0014 | −0.0009c | 0.0005 | −0.0018 | 0.0000 |
| Parental age | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | −0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | 0.0002 | −0.0001 | 0.0006 | −0.0001 | 0.0002 | −0.0004 | 0.0003 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | −0.0002 | 0.0004 |
| Children’s age | ||||||||||||||||
| 3-5 | −0.0051c | 0.0030 | −0.0110 | 0.0008 | −0.0126c | 0.0073 | −0.0269 | 0.0017 | ||||||||
| 6-8 | −0.0074c | 0.0040 | −0.0152 | 0.0005 | ||||||||||||
| 9-11 | −0.0161a | 0.0039 | −0.0237 | −0.0085 | −0.0100b | 0.0048 | −0.0194 | −0.0007 | ||||||||
| 12-14 | −0.0154a | 0.0043 | −0.0238 | −0.0069 | ||||||||||||
| 15-18 | −0.0239a | 0.0048 | −0.0333 | −0.0145 | −0.0078b | 0.0036 | −0.0148 | −0.0007 | ||||||||
| Gender was male | −0.0031 | 0.0023 | −0.0075 | 0.0014 | −0.0095c | 0.0056 | −0.0206 | 0.0015 | 0.0025 | 0.0041 | −0.0055 | 0.0106 | −0.0036 | 0.0026 | −0.0086 | 0.0015 |
| Ethnicity was Han | −0.0004 | 0.0099 | −0.0198 | 0.0191 | 0.0022 | 0.0275 | −0.0517 | 0.0560 | 0.0023 | 0.0170 | −0.0310 | 0.0357 | 0.0005 | 0.0105 | −0.0200 | 0.0210 |
| Urban | 0.0095a | 0.0028 | 0.0039 | 0.0150 | 0.0113 c | 0.0067 | −0.0018 | 0.0244 | 0.0190a | 0.0063 | 0.0067 | 0.0314 | −0.0017 | 0.0029 | −0.0074 | 0.0041 |
| Region | ||||||||||||||||
| Guanzhong | −0.0006 | 0.0026 | −0.0056 | 0.0044 | −0.0011 | 0.0061 | −0.0131 | 0.0109 | −0.0015 | 0.0045 | −0.0104 | 0.0073 | 0.0023 | 0.0030 | −0.0036 | 0.0083 |
| Shanbei | −0.0033 | 0.0030 | −0.0092 | 0.0026 | −0.0117 | 0.0079 | −0.0272 | 0.0038 | 0.0012 | 0.0057 | −0.0100 | 0.0124 | −0.0037 | 0.0039 | −0.0113 | 0.0039 |
| Family size | 0.0022b | 0.0011 | 0.0001 | 0.0042 | 0.0047c | 0.0026 | −0.0004 | 0.0099 | 0.0012 | 0.0017 | −0.0022 | 0.0046 | 0.0014 | 0.0012 | −0.0010 | 0.0038 |
| No. of obs. | 10,596 | 3,732 | 3,077 | 3,787 | ||||||||||||
Note: aStatistically significant at the 1% level, bstatistically significant at the 5% level, cstatistically significant at the 10% level; S.E. robust standard errors; marginal effects instead of the original coefficients are reported to show the marginal change of the dependent variable given a one unit change in an explanatory variable. The reference groups were: “the poorest” for “per capita household expense”; “no” for “children had insurance”; “0-2” for “children’s age”; “female” for “gender was male”; “others” for “ethnicity was Han”; “rural” for “urban”; “Shannan” for “region”
Negative binomial regression results on the use of infusion during outpatient visits in the past 2 weeks
| Whether or not children used infusion during outpatient visits (marginal effect reported) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Full sample | (2) Age 0-5 | (3) Age 6-11 | (4) Age 12-18 | |||||||||||||
| dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | |||||
| Parents had outpatient visit | 0.5701a | 0.0518 | 0.4686 | 0.6716 | 0.6624a | 0.0412 | 0.5817 | 0.7431 | 0.5447b | 0.1527 | 0.2454 | 0.8441 | 0.3005 | 0.1874 | −0.0668 | 0.6679 |
| Per capita household expense | ||||||||||||||||
| Poor | 0.1114 | 0.0713 | −0.0284 | 0.2512 | 0.2073b | 0.1036 | 0.0042 | 0.4104 | 0.1329 | 0.1337 | −0.1291 | 0.3948 | −0.172 | 0.1500 | −0.4660 | 0.1221 |
| Average | 0.0243 | 0.0734 | −0.1194 | 0.1681 | 0.1086 | 0.1137 | −0.1141 | 0.3314 | −0.1129 | 0.1279 | −0.3635 | 0.1377 | −0.0308 | 0.1764 | −0.3765 | 0.3150 |
| Rich | 0.1145 | 0.0769 | −0.0362 | 0.2652 | 0.1482 | 0.1089 | −0.0651 | 0.3616 | 0.0696 | 0.1790 | −0.2812 | 0.4204 | 0.1024 | 0.1816 | −0.2535 | 0.4583 |
| Richest | 0.2171a | 0.0768 | 0.0665 | 0.3677 | 0.2940a | 0.1061 | 0.0860 | 0.5020 | 0.4491a | 0.1494 | 0.1564 | 0.7418 | −0.2679a | 0.1343 | −0.5312 | −0.0046 |
| Children had insurance | 0.0162 | 0.0798 | −0.1402 | 0.1725 | 0.0134 | 0.0898 | −0.1627 | 0.1895 | 0.2024 | 0.1986 | −0.1869 | 0.5916 | ||||
| Children’s days of illness | 0.0170a | 0.0059 | 0.0054 | 0.0286 | 0.0270a | 0.0090 | 0.0093 | 0.0447 | 0.0129 | 0.0119 | −0.0104 | 0.0363 | −0.0039 | 0.0126 | −0.0287 | 0.0208 |
| Children’s height (ln) | −0.3658b | 0.1470 | −0.6538 | −0.0777 | −0.3580b | 0.1696 | −0.6903 | −0.0256 | −0.2018 | 0.4052 | −0.9959 | 0.5924 | −3.1048a | 1.0277 | −5.1190 | −1.0905 |
| Children’s weight (ln) | 0.1626b | 0.0664 | 0.0324 | 0.2928 | 0.1033 | 0.0731 | −0.0400 | 0.2465 | 0.2773 | 0.2061 | −0.1267 | 0.6813 | 0.6444 | 0.4297 | −0.1978 | 1.4866 |
| Prenatal days of illness | −0.0136b | 0.0057 | −0.0247 | −0.0024 | −0.0252a | 0.0083 | −0.0415 | −0.0089 | −0.0112 | 0.0126 | −0.0358 | 0.0134 | −0.0036 | 0.0119 | −0.0268 | 0.0197 |
| Parental age | 0.0030a | 0.0017 | −0.0003 | 0.0063 | 0.0047b | 0.0022 | 0.0004 | 0.0089 | −0.0059 | 0.0044 | −0.0144 | 0.0027 | 0.0001 | 0.0071 | −0.0139 | 0.0141 |
| Children’s age | ||||||||||||||||
| 3–5 | −0.0299 | 0.0623 | −0.1520 | 0.0923 | −0.0079 | 0.0695 | −0.1441 | 0.1284 | ||||||||
| 6–8 | 0.0261 | 0.0896 | −0.1496 | 0.2018 | ||||||||||||
| 9–11 | −0.0916 | 0.1032 | −0.2939 | 0.1108 | −0.1808a | 0.0965 | −0.3698 | 0.0083 | ||||||||
| 12–14 | −0.0229 | 0.1298 | −0.2774 | 0.2315 | ||||||||||||
| 15–18 | 0.0245 | 0.1472 | −0.2639 | 0.3130 | 0.2925b | 0.1142 | 0.0687 | 0.5162 | ||||||||
| Gender was male | 0.0431 | 0.0402 | −0.0356 | 0.1219 | 0.0601 | 0.0560 | −0.0496 | 0.1698 | −0.0191 | 0.0822 | −0.1803 | 0.1421 | 0.0962 | 0.1042 | −0.1229 | 0.2857 |
| Ethnicity was Han | −0.1443 | 0.2482 | −0.6308 | 0.3422 | −0.0702 | 0.2942 | −0.6468 | 0.5064 | ||||||||
| Urban | 0.0476 | 0.0455 | −0.0417 | 0.1368 | 0.0418 | 0.0623 | −0.0803 | 0.1639 | 0.0186 | 0.0988 | −0.1751 | 0.2123 | 0.0962 | 0.1209 | −0.1409 | 0.3332 |
| Region | ||||||||||||||||
| Guanzhong | −0.0127 | 0.0470 | −0.1049 | 0.0795 | −0.0106 | 0.0650 | −0.1380 | 0.1167 | −0.0644 | 0.0999 | −0.2601 | 0.1313 | −0.1179 | 0.1093 | −0.3321 | 0.0963 |
| Shanbei | −0.0184 | 0.0603 | −0.1366 | 0.0999 | 0.0066 | 0.0808 | −0.1517 | 0.1650 | −0.2344b | 0.0960 | −0.4225 | −0.0463 | 0.0728 | 0.1741 | −0.2685 | 0.4141 |
| Family size | 0.0267 | 0.0179 | −0.0084 | 0.0618 | 0.0394 | 0.0256 | −0.0108 | 0.0897 | 0.0853b | 0.0357 | 0.0152 | 0.1553 | −0.1122b | 0.0497 | −0.2096 | −0.0148 |
| No. of obs. | 672 | 391 | 164 | 115 | ||||||||||||
Note: aStatistically significant at the 1% level, bstatistically significant at the 5% level, astatistically significant at the 10% level; S.E. robust standard errors; marginal effects instead of the original coefficients are reported to show the marginal change of the dependent variable given a one unit change in an explanatory variable. The reference groups were: “the poorest” for “per capita household expense”; “no” for “children had insurance”; “0–2” for “children’s age”; “female” for “gender was male”; “others” for “ethnicity was Han”; “rural” for “urban”; “Shannan” for “region”
Negative binomial regression results on the use of inpatient services in the last year
| Number of children’s inpatient visit in the last year (marginal effect reported) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Full sample | (2) Age 0–5 | (3) Age 6–11 | (4) Age 12–18 | |||||||||||||
| dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | dy/dx | S.E. | 95% CI | |||||
| Parents had outpatient visit | 0.0567a | 0.0104 | 0.0364 | 0.0770 | 0.2419a | 0.0462 | 0.1514 | 0.3324 | 0.0239 | 0.0163 | −0.0080 | 0.0558 | 0.0009 | 0.0056 | −0.0101 | 0.0119 |
| Per capita household expense | ||||||||||||||||
| Poor | 0.0187b | 0.0080 | 0.0031 | 0.0343 | 0.1042a | 0.0353 | 0.0349 | 0.1735 | −0.0058 | 0.0066 | −0.0188 | 0.0072 | 0.0022 | 0.0048 | −0.0073 | 0.0116 |
| Average | 0.0248a | 0.0090 | 0.0072 | 0.0425 | 0.1355a | 0.0436 | 0.0500 | 0.2210 | −0.0036 | 0.0072 | −0.0177 | 0.0105 | 0.0035 | 0.0051 | −0.0065 | 0.0134 |
| Rich | 0.0419a | 0.0111 | 0.0200 | 0.0637 | 0.1910a | 0.0492 | 0.0945 | 0.2875 | −0.0106 | 0.0076 | −0.0255 | 0.0044 | 0.0191b | 0.0092 | 0.0011 | 0.0372 |
| Richest | 0.0331a | 0.0103 | 0.0130 | 0.0532 | 0.1533a | 0.0464 | 0.0623 | 0.2442 | −0.0082 | 0.0074 | −0.0227 | 0.0063 | 0.0133c | 0.0071 | −0.0007 | 0.0273 |
| Children had insurance | 0.0292a | 0.0049 | 0.0195 | 0.0388 | 0.0941a | 0.0170 | 0.0609 | 0.1274 | 0.0078 | 0.0156 | −0.0227 | 0.0383 | 0.0166a | 0.0024 | 0.0118 | 0.0214 |
| Children's height (ln) | 0.0040 | 0.0157 | −0.0269 | 0.0348 | −0.0107 | 0.0500 | −0.1087 | 0.0873 | 0.0545b | 0.0232 | 0.0090 | 0.1000 | −0.0153 | 0.0159 | −0.0465 | 0.0160 |
| Children's weight (ln) | −0.0228a | 0.0085 | −0.0395 | −0.0060 | −0.0310 | 0.0269 | −0.0838 | 0.0217 | −0.0591a | 0.0115 | −0.0816 | −0.0366 | −0.0011 | 0.0078 | −0.0163 | 0.0142 |
| Parental age | 0.0004b | 0.0002 | 0.0001 | 0.0007 | 0.0008 | 0.0005 | −0.0002 | 0.0018 | 0.0008a | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | 0.0012 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | −0.0002 | 0.0004 |
| Children's age | ||||||||||||||||
| 3-5 | −0.0114c | 0.0058 | −0.0227 | 0.0000 | −0.0446b | 0.0213 | −0.0863 | −0.0028 | ||||||||
| 6-8 | −0.0352a | 0.0054 | −0.0458 | −0.0246 | ||||||||||||
| 9-11 | −0.0467a | 0.0053 | −0.0571 | −0.0362 | −0.0113c | 0.0065 | −0.0241 | 0.0014 | ||||||||
| 12-14 | −0.0480a | 0.0066 | −0.0610 | −0.0351 | ||||||||||||
| 15-18 | −0.0545a | 0.0077 | −0.0697 | −0.0394 | −0.0008 | 0.0029 | −0.0065 | 0.0048 | ||||||||
| Gender was male | 0.0116a | 0.0041 | 0.0036 | 0.0196 | 0.0213 | 0.0153 | −0.0086 | 0.0512 | 0.0130b | 0.0055 | 0.0022 | 0.0237 | 0.0054b | 0.0026 | 0.0003 | 0.0105 |
| Ethnicity was Han | 0.0217b | 0.0104 | 0.0014 | 0.0421 | 0.0781b | 0.0341 | 0.0113 | 0.1448 | 0.0080 | 0.0193 | −0.0298 | 0.0458 | −0.0029 | 0.0135 | −0.0293 | 0.0235 |
| Urban | −0.0113a | 0.0043 | −0.0197 | −0.0029 | −0.0342b | 0.0162 | −0.0659 | −0.0024 | −0.0044 | 0.0059 | −0.0158 | 0.0071 | −0.0030 | 0.0025 | −0.0079 | 0.0019 |
| Region | ||||||||||||||||
| Guanzhong | 0.0194a | 0.0049 | 0.0099 | 0.0289 | 0.0482a | 0.0176 | 0.0136 | 0.0827 | 0.0278a | 0.0080 | 0.0121 | 0.0435 | 0.0028 | 0.0027 | −0.0024 | 0.0080 |
| Shanbei | −0.0054 | 0.0062 | −0.0176 | 0.0068 | −0.0368c | 0.0214 | −0.0789 | 0.0052 | 0.0359b | 0.0156 | 0.0053 | 0.0665 | −0.0084a | 0.0026 | −0.0134 | −0.0034 |
| Family size | 0.0068a | 0.0020 | 0.0030 | 0.0106 | 0.0326a | 0.0077 | 0.0176 | 0.0476 | −0.0041c | 0.0024 | −0.0088 | 0.0007 | 0.0024b | 0.0010 | 0.0005 | 0.0044 |
| No. of obs. | 9,998 | 3,546 | 2,918 | 3,534 | ||||||||||||
Note: aStatistically significant at the 1% level, bstatistically significant at the 5% level, cstatistically significant at the 10% level; S.E. robust standard errors; marginal effects instead of the original coefficients are reported to show the marginal change of the dependent variable given a one unit change in an explanatory variable. The reference groups were: “the poorest” for “per capita household expense”; “no” for “children had insurance”; “0–2” for “children’s age”; “female” for “gender was male”; “others” for “ethnicity was Han”; “rural” for “urban”; “Shannan” for “region”