Literature DB >> 28279176

PALB2 mutations in BRCA1/2-mutation negative breast and ovarian cancer patients from Poland.

Anna Kluska1, Aneta Balabas1, Magdalena Piatkowska1, Katarzyna Czarny1, Katarzyna Paczkowska1, Dorota Nowakowska1, Michal Mikula2, Jerzy Ostrowski3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The PALB2 gene encodes a protein that plays a crucial role in maintaining genomic integrity. Germline inactivating mutations in PALB2 are associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. The prevalence and spectrum of recurrent PALB2 germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer patients from Poland is not clearly defined.
METHODS: PALB2 exons were amplified from 460 BRCA1/2-mutation negative women with familial breast and/or ovarian cancer and early-onset breast cancer using AmpliSeq technology and sequenced on an Ion Torrent PGM sequencer. In addition, eight selected variants were genotyped using TaqMan assays in 807 BRCA1/2-mutation negative breast cancer patients and 1690 healthy women.
RESULTS: Two recurrent PALB2 mutations, c.172_175delTTGT and c.509_510delGA, were identified, along with one novel mutation, c.347insT. In total, PALB2 pathogenic mutations were detected in 7/460 (1.5%) patients. Furthermore, in breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, several single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were detected in the PALB2 coding region. In an additional group of 807 patients, eight (1%) carriers of two pathogenic mutations, c.172_175delTTGT (0.5%) and c.509_510delGA (0.5%), were identified. The c.509_510delGA mutation was not identified in healthy controls, while c.172_175delTTGT was identified in 4/1690 (0.24%) of control women.
CONCLUSIONS: Germline mutations in the PALB2 gene were observed at a frequency of approximately 1.5% in Polish breast and/or ovarian cancer patients. Our study confirms two recurrent PALB2 mutations; c.172_175delGA and c.509_510delGA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; Next-generation sequencing; PALB2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28279176      PMCID: PMC5345197          DOI: 10.1186/s12920-017-0251-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genomics        ISSN: 1755-8794            Impact factor:   3.063


Background

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide [1]. About 5–10% of breast and 10% of ovarian cancers are thought to be hereditary [2]. Mutations in the two main susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, account for 20% of hereditary breast cancer (HBC) and 30% of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) [3]. Other genes participating in DNA-damage response pathways, including CHEK2, NBS1, ATM, BRIP1, and PALB2, are also involved in HBC and HBOC [4, 5]. The PALB2 (MIM 610355, Partner and Localizer of B RCA 2) gene was identified in a search for novel components of endogenous BRCA2 containing complexes [6]. The PALB2 protein interacts with both BRCA1 and BRCA2 through its N-terminal coiled-coil and C-terminal WD-40 domains, respectively. These three proteins form a “BRCA complex” in which PALB2 acts as a bridge between BRCA1 and BRCA2. The “BRCA complex” is crucial for initiating homologous recombination in the DNA-damage response [6-8]. Biallelic inactivating germline mutations in the PALB2 gene lead to Fanconi anemia (Fanconi anemia type N), whereas monoallelic mutations are associated with an increased risk of breast, pancreatic, and possibly ovarian cancer [9-14]. Germline mutations in PALB2 are responsible for 1–3.9% of HBC [15-26]. Similar to BRCA2, germline mutations in PALB2 are also associated with hereditary predisposition to male breast cancer. To date, approximately 50 truncating mutations in PALB2 have been detected in breast cancer families worldwide. The first breast cancer family-based association study estimated that a relative risk of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.4–3.9) is conferred by mutations of PALB2 [12]. Most recently, Antoniou and colleagues. applied a modified segregation procedure to show that the age-specific risk of breast cancer in female mutation carriers overlaps with that conferred by BRCA2 mutations [27]. In a previous study, we demonstrated that in a group of 512 patients for whom targeted BRCA1/2 mutation testing did not show any pathogenic variants, sequencing of BRCA1/2 exons identified 52 carriers of mutations [28, 29]. The aim of the present study was to investigate the contribution of PALB2 germline mutations in a group of 460 BRCA1/2-mutation negative breast and/or ovarian cancer patients and identify the optimal panel of recurrent mutations for genetic screening of PALB2.

Methods

Patients

DNA samples were chosen from the repository of the Genetic Counseling Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology in Warsaw. In-depth interviews assessed personal and familial cancer history. Healthy women with no known history of cancer were enrolled from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Patients comprised a group of 460 BRCA1/2-mutation negative breast cancer patients (with a median age of 43 years, range 17–68 years) and included 165, 103, and 192 women with HBC, HBOC, and early-onset breast cancer (EOBC), respectively [29]. This group of patients had undergone full BRCA1/2 sequencing using the Ion AmpliSeq BRCA1 and BRCA2 Panel (Thermo) on a PGM sequencer as part of our previous study [29]. An additional group, comprising 807 selected BRCA1/2-mutation negative women, was surveyed using TaqMan SNP genotyping assays. This group had a median age of 48 years (range 20–85 years); included 322, 81, and 404 HBC, HBOC, and EOBC patients, respectively; and were negative for 20 selected BRCA1/2 mutations, including 11 mutations in BRCA1, namely, c.66_67delAG, c.181T > C, c.3756delGTCT, c.3700_3704del5, c.4035delA, c.3777delT, c.4065delTCAA, c.4041delAG, c.5263delC, c.5213G > A, and 5370C > T, and nine mutations in BRCA2, namely, c.1408G > T, c.5946delT, c.5239insT, c.6447delTA, c.5964delAT, c.7910del5, c.9382C > T, c.8924delT, and c.9402delT [28].

NGS of PALB2

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood, as previously described [28]. DNA concentrations were determined using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo) and the dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo). For library construction, the Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit 2.0 (Thermo) and Ion AmpliSeq PALB2 custom primers, comprising 27 primer pairs spanning 5.29 kb, were used to amplify the coding regions of the PALB2 gene. Library concentrations and size distributions were determined with the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo) and a High Sensitivity DNA Analysis Kit on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent), respectively. Up to 48 libraries were combined in equimolar concentrations following their loading onto an Ion Chef for DNA template preparation with a set of reagents from an Ion PGM IC 200 Kit and an Ion 316 Chip Kit v2 BC (Thermo). Sequencing was performed on the Ion Torrent PGM in a mode with 500-flow runs. Data were analyzed on the Ion Torrent server using the Torrent Suite software (Thermo). Sequencing reads were aligned to the hg19 reference genome and fitted to PALB2 designed amplicons. The coverage analysis and variant caller plug-ins were run with optimal settings to identify germline variants. PALB2 gene variants were annotated using data from ClinVar-NCBI and LOVD.

TaqMan genotyping

Mutations found with NGS were validated by Sanger sequencing. Furthermore, eight selected variants, namely 172_175del4, c.347insT, c.509_510delGA, Gln559Arg, Glu672Gln, Leu939Trp, Gly998Glu, and Thr1100Thr were analyzed using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Thermo) on an ABI 7900HT qPCR system (Thermo), as previously described [28].

Results

NGS analysis

We evaluated the frequencies of PALB2 germline mutations in 460 BRCA1/2-mutation negative breast and/or ovarian cancer patients. Of the 460 women, 268 had HBC and/or HBOC, and 192 had EOBC, with a median age at breast cancer diagnosis of 43 years (range 17–68 years). In this group, we identified seven unrelated carriers (1.5%) of the three PALB2 truncating mutations: c.172_175delTTGT (n = 4), c.347insT (n = 1), and c.509_510delGA (n = 2) (Table 1). Six of the seven carriers (2.2%) were among the 268 HBOC patients, and one (0.5%) was in the EOBC group.
Table 1

Truncating and putative pathogenic missense mutations in the PALB2 gene revealed by NGS of samples from 460 breast cancer patients

Exon PALB2 cDNA changeProtein changeAge at diagnosis (years)Family history
3c.172_175delTTGTp.Gln60ArgfsBR62I- BR63, II- BR70
BR48I- BR58
BR30I- GC68, II- THYR60
BR40I- BR50, MEL60, PR85
4c.347insTp.Leu116fsBR40Not reported
c.509_510delGAp.Arg170IlefsBR59I- BR66, II- BR40
BR32I- BR38

I and II indicate first and second degree relatives, respectively; BR breast cancer, GC gastric cancer, THYR thyroid cancer, MEL melanoma, PR prostate cancer

Truncating and putative pathogenic missense mutations in the PALB2 gene revealed by NGS of samples from 460 breast cancer patients I and II indicate first and second degree relatives, respectively; BR breast cancer, GC gastric cancer, THYR thyroid cancer, MEL melanoma, PR prostate cancer In addition to these pathogenic mutations, we detected 10 SNVs in the coding region of the PALB2 gene (Table 2).
Table 2

PALB2 genetic variants in familial breast and/or ovarian cancer and in non-familial breast cancer patients identified by NGS and TaqMan genotyping

NGSTaqman genotyping
Localization PALB2 cDNA changePALB2 protein changersIDFamilial cancer (n = 268)Non-familial cancer (n = 192)All (n = 460)Familial cancer (n = 403)Non-familial cancer (n = 404)All (n = 807)Healthy controls (n = 1690)
Exon 3c.172_175delTTGTp.Gln60Argfs1801771433 (1.1%)1 (0.5%)4 (0.9%)1 (0.2%)3 (0.7%)4 (0.5%)4 (0.2%)
Exon 4c.347insTp.Leu116fsnovel1 (0.4%)01 (0.2%)0000
c.509_510delGAp.Arg170Ilefs5157261232 (0.7%)02 (0.4%)4 (1.0%)04 (0.5%)0
c.1010T > Cp.Leu337Ser454940928 (3.0%)6 (3.1%)14 (3.0%)ntntntnt
c.1676A > Gp.Gln559Arg15245160 (22.4%)39 (20.3%)94 (20.4%)101 (25%)101 (25%)202 (0.25%)350 (21.3%)
c.1572A > Gp.Ser524Ser454724001 (0.4%)01 (0.2%)ntntntnt
Exon 5c.2014G > Cp.Glu672Gln4553244016 (6.0%)7 (3.6%)22 (4.8%)27 (6.7%)32 (7.9%)59 (7.3%)108 (6.5%)
Exon 7c.2590C > Tp.Pro854Ser455683395 (1.9%)1 (0.5%)6 (1.3%)ntntntnt
Exon 8c.2794G > Ap.Val932Met456240366 (2.2%)1 (0.5%)2 (0.4%)ntntntnt
c.2816T > Gp.Leu939Trp45481921 (0.4%)1 (0.5%)2 (0.4%)4 (1.0%)2 (0.5%)6 (0.7%)3 (0.18%)
Exon 9c.2869A > Gp.Lys957Gln51572610301 (0.5%)1 (0.2%)ntntntnt
c.2993G > Ap.Gly998Glu455516368 (3.0%)7 (3.6%)15 (3.3%)21 (5.2%)19 (4.7%)40 (5.0%)73 (4.5%)
Exon 12c.3300T > Gp.Thr1100Thr4551610015 (5.6%)7 (3.6%)22 (4.8%)27 (6.7%)32 (7.9%)59 (7.3%)108 (6.6%)

nt not tested

PALB2 genetic variants in familial breast and/or ovarian cancer and in non-familial breast cancer patients identified by NGS and TaqMan genotyping nt not tested

Genotyping of selected variants detected by NGS

Using TaqMan SNP genotyping assays, the frequencies of eight selected variants, including three truncating mutations (c.172_175delTTGT, c.347insT, c.509_510delGA), a rare missense variant (Leu939Trp), and four common polymorphisms (Gln559Arg, Glu672Gln, Gly998Glu, Thr1100Thr), were tested in an additional group of 807 breast and/or ovarian cancer patients (median age, 48 years; range 20–85 years), and 1690 healthy women (median age, 58 years; range 26–79 years). The pathogenic mutation, c.172_175delTTGT, was identified in 4/807 (0.5%) breast cancer patients and in 4/1690 (0.24%) healthy controls (Table 2). The c.509_510delGA mutation was detected in four breast cancer patients, and was not found in healthy control subjects. The c.347insT mutation was identified in neither additional cancer patients nor healthy controls. The frequencies of the four common polymorphisms were similar in cancer patients and healthy controls; therefore, the clinical significance of these polymorphic variants could not be confirmed. In addition, the Leu939Trp missense variant was detected in six of 807 (0.7%) cancer patients and three of 1690 (0.2%) healthy controls; hence, the incidence of this change was not significantly different between patients and controls.

Discussion

We identified three pathogenic PALB2 mutations among 460 BRCA1/2-mutation negative breast and/or ovarian cancer patients. The two recurrent mutations identified in our study were c.172_175delTTGT and c.509_510delGA. The novel pathogenic mutation c.347insT was found only in one young patient with HBC. The two recurrent mutations were identified in five patients with HBC and one patient with EOBC, but without any family history. In the cancer patient group, the recurrent variants (c.172_175delTTGT and c.509_510delGA) accounted for 86% (6/7) of PALB2 mutations. Our NGS and TaqMan genotyping studies indicate that the pathogenic c.509_510delGA mutation contributes to familial breast and/or ovarian cancer (0.9%); however, the c.172_175delTTGT mutation was identified both in familial (0.6%) and non-familial cancer patients (0.7%). The recurrent mutation c.509_510delGA is a European founder mutation that has been identified in breast cancer patients from Poland, Belarus, Russia, and Germany [16, 17, 24, 25]. This mutation has been detected in 0.6–1.4% of breast cancer patients in three independent studies in Poland [5, 16, 26]. The other recurrent PALB2 mutation, c.172_175delTTGT, was identified in breast cancer patients from the Czech Republic and Poland [5, 18, 26]. The PALB2 gene mutation rate (1.5%) determined for our group of breast and/or ovarian cancer patients was similar to those reported by other studies. PALB2 germline mutations have been identified in Finland, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Russia, Italy, Spain, Australia, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Canada, USA, China, and South Africa, with rates ranging from 0.1 to 3.9%, depending on the population [15-27]. In breast cancer families with both female and male breast cancer, PALB2 mutation rates increased to 6.7% in a UK study and to 9.0% in a Spanish study [12, 15]. In addition to clearly pathogenic mutations, we detected 10 missense variants in the coding region of the PALB2 gene. Identifying variants of unknown significance in cancer susceptibility genes represents a real problem in genetic counseling [30]. It should be stressed that, to date, no PALB2 missense variant has been classified as definitely pathogenic in any large population study [31]. Park et al. reported that the rare missense variant, Leu939Trp, is associated with altered direct binding of PALB2 to the RAD51C, RAD51, and BRCA2 proteins [32]. Functionally, the Leu939Trp mutant displays a decreased capacity for DNA double-strand break repair and an increased cellular sensitivity to ionizing radiation. In our group of breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, the missense variant, Leu939Trp, was detected in two (0.4%) breast cancer patients, one (0.4%) patient with HBOC, and in one (0.5%) with EOBC. Interestingly, in our study, the missense variant rate was 3.5 times more frequent in breast cancer patients (0.7%) than in healthy controls (0.2%), although the differences were not statistically significant. Consistent with this observation, a recent large case-control study by Southey et al. found no evidence of association of the Lys939Trp variant with breast cancer risk [33]. Furthermore, Catucci and colleagues [34] have also recently shown that the Lys939Trp variant does not disrupt the homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair activity of PALB2 and they concluded that this variant should be regarded as neutral with no clinical relevance to risk of breast cancer.

Conclusions

In summary, our study confirmed two PALB2 recurrent mutations, c.172_175delGA and c.509_510delGA, in BRCA1/2-mutation negative breast and/or ovarian cancer patients from Poland. The c.509_510delGA mutation contributed to familial cancer but was absent in non-familial cancer patients, while the c.172_175delTTGT mutation was identified in both familial and non-familial cancer patients.
  34 in total

1.  Fanconi anemia is associated with a defect in the BRCA2 partner PALB2.

Authors:  Bing Xia; Josephine C Dorsman; Najim Ameziane; Yne de Vries; Martin A Rooimans; Qing Sheng; Gerard Pals; Abdellatif Errami; Eliane Gluckman; Julian Llera; Weidong Wang; David M Livingston; Hans Joenje; Johan P de Winter
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  PALB2 mutations in European familial pancreatic cancer families.

Authors:  E P Slater; P Langer; E Niemczyk; K Strauch; J Butler; N Habbe; J P Neoptolemos; W Greenhalf; D K Bartsch
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Prevalence of PALB2 mutation c.509_510delGA in unselected breast cancer patients from Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Monika Noskowicz; Natalia Bogdanova; Marina Bermisheva; Zalina Takhirova; Natalia Antonenkova; Elza Khusnutdinova; Michael Bremer; Hans Christiansen; Tjoung-Won Park-Simon; Peter Hillemanns; Thilo Dörk
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  PALB2, which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility gene.

Authors:  Nazneen Rahman; Sheila Seal; Deborah Thompson; Patrick Kelly; Anthony Renwick; Anna Elliott; Sarah Reid; Katarina Spanova; Rita Barfoot; Tasnim Chagtai; Hiran Jayatilake; Lesley McGuffog; Sandra Hanks; D Gareth Evans; Diana Eccles; Douglas F Easton; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  PALB2 mutations in German and Russian patients with bilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Natalia Bogdanova; Anna P Sokolenko; Aglaya G Iyevleva; Svetlana N Abysheva; Magda Blaut; Michael Bremer; Hans Christiansen; Margret Rave-Fränk; Thilo Dörk; Evgeny N Imyanitov
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Identification of a novel truncating PALB2 mutation and analysis of its contribution to early-onset breast cancer in French-Canadian women.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Parviz Ghadirian; Mohammed Reza Akbari; Nancy Hamel; Sylvie Giroux; Nelly Sabbaghian; Andrew Darnel; Robert Royer; Aletta Poll; Eve Fafard; André Robidoux; Ginette Martin; Tarek A Bismar; Marc Tischkowitz; Francois Rousseau; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  PALB2 and breast cancer: ready for clinical translation!

Authors:  Melissa C Southey; Zhi L Teo; Ingrid Winship
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2013-07-19

9.  Breast cancer-associated missense mutants of the PALB2 WD40 domain, which directly binds RAD51C, RAD51 and BRCA2, disrupt DNA repair.

Authors:  J-Y Park; T R Singh; N Nassar; F Zhang; M Freund; H Hanenberg; A R Meetei; P R Andreassen
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Recurrent mutations of BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 in the population of breast and ovarian cancer patients in Southern Poland.

Authors:  P Wojcik; M Jasiowka; E Strycharz; M Sobol; D Hodorowicz-Zaniewska; P Skotnicki; T Byrski; P Blecharz; E Marczyk; I Cedrych; J Jakubowicz; J Lubiński; V Sopik; S Narod; P Pierzchalski
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.857

View more
  6 in total

1.  Novel clinicopathological and molecular characterization of metanephric adenoma: a study of 28 cases.

Authors:  Ying Ding; Cong Wang; Xuejie Li; Yangyang Jiang; Ping Mei; Wenbin Huang; Guoxin Song; Jinsong Wang; Guoqiang Ping; Ran Hu; Chen Miao; Xiao He; Gang Chen; Hai Li; Yan Zhu; Zhihong Zhang
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.644

2.  PALB2 germline mutations in a multi-gene panel testing cohort of 1905 breast-ovarian cancer patients in Argentina.

Authors:  Ariana Gonzalez; Franco Del Greco; Laura Vargas-Roig; Bianca Brun; Gonzalo Tabares; Alejandra Mampel; Cecilia Montes; Claudia Martin; Marcela Lopez; Norma Rossi; Luisina Bruno; Carolina Ponce; Patricia Quaglio; Alvaro Yanzi; Santiago Acevedo; Lilia Lugo; Paula Lopez Breccia; Silvia Avila; Silvina Sisterna; María Soledad Del Castillo; Martín Vazquez; Lina M Nuñez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  DNA Repair and Ovarian Carcinogenesis: Impact on Risk, Prognosis and Therapy Outcome.

Authors:  Kristyna Tomasova; Andrea Cumova; Karolina Seborova; Josef Horak; Kamila Koucka; Ludmila Vodickova; Radka Vaclavikova; Pavel Vodicka
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  BRCA1/2 Mutation Detection in the Tumor Tissue from Selected Polish Patients with Breast Cancer Using Next Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Ewelina Szczerba; Katarzyna Kamińska; Tomasz Mierzwa; Marcin Misiek; Janusz Kowalewski; Marzena Anna Lewandowska
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Prevalence of specific and recurrent/founder pathogenic variants in BRCA genes in breast and ovarian cancer in North Africa.

Authors:  Oubaida ElBiad; Abdelilah Laraqui; Fatima El Boukhrissi; Chaimaa Mounjid; Maryame Lamsisi; Tahar Bajjou; Hicham Elannaz; Amine Idriss Lahlou; Jaouad Kouach; Khadija Benchekroune; Mohammed Oukabli; Hafsa Chahdi; Moulay Mustapha Ennaji; Rachid Tanz; Yassir Sbitti; Mohammed Ichou; Khalid Ennibi; Bouabid Badaoui; Yassine Sekhsokh
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Clinical Validity of Next-Generation Sequencing Multi-Gene Panel Testing for Detecting Pathogenic Variants in Patients With Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.

Authors:  Jaeeun Yoo; Gun Dong Lee; Jee Hae Kim; Seung Nam Lee; Hyojin Chae; Eunhee Han; Yonggoo Kim; Myungshin Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.464

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.