| Literature DB >> 28277551 |
Reza Nafisi-Moghadam1, Abolghasem Rahimdel2, Tahereh Shanbehzadeh3, Razieh Fallah4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Suitable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques from conventional to new devices can help physicians in diagnosis and follow up of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients. The aim of present research was to compare effectiveness of Fluid Attenuation Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) sequence of conventional MRI and Diffuse Weighted Imaging (DWI) sequence as a new technique in detection of brain MS plaques. MATERIALS &Entities:
Keywords: Diffuse Weighted Imaging; Fluid Attenuation Inversion Recovery; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Multiple Sclerosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28277551 PMCID: PMC5329755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Child Neurol ISSN: 1735-4668
Comparison of Duration of Disease and Frequency of Clinical Symptoms Based on Gender
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 32 | 8 | ||
|
| less than one year | 6(18.7%) | 1(12.5%) | 0.28 |
| 1-5 years | 8(25%) | 5(62.5%) | ||
| 5-10 years | 8(25%) | 1(12.5%) | ||
| 10-14 years | 10(31.3%) | 1(12.5%) | ||
|
| Ataxia | 6(18.75%) | 0 | 0.18 |
| Ptosis | 1(3%) | 0 | 0.61 | |
| Diplopia | 8(25%) | 3(37.5%) | 0.48 | |
| Vertigo | 12(37.5%) | 0 | 0.03 | |
| Numbness | 20(62.5%) | 5(62.5%) | 1 | |
| Headache | 17(53%) | 2(25%) | 0.15 | |
| Muscle weakness | 14(43.75%) | 4(50%) | 0.75 | |
| Blurred vision | 24(75%) | 4(50%) | 0.17 | |
| Muscle spasm | 13(40.7%) | 1(12.5%) | 0.14 | |
Frequency of Different Shapes of MS Plaque Based on MRI Sequences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
| 24(7.1%) | 127(37.2%) | 127(37.2%) | 63(18.5%) | 341(100%) | 0.02 |
|
| 11(10.6%) | 35(33.6%) | 39(37.5%) | 19(18.3%) | 104(100%) | 0.01 |
|
| 11(11%) | 36(36%) | 35(35%) | 18(18%) | 100(100%) | 0.01 |
|
| 0 | 14(51.8%) | 13(48.2%) | 0 | 27(100%) | 0.89 |
|
| 2(3.2%) | 25(39.7%) | 24(38.1%) | 12(19%) | 63(100%) | 0.03 |
|
| 0 | 17(36.1%) | 16(34.1%) | 14(29.8%) | 47(100%) | 0.1 |
Location and Diameter of Brain MS Plaques in Different MRI Sequences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
|
|
| 1(4.2%) | 2(1.6%) | 2(1.6%) | 2(3.2%) | 7(2 %) | 0.001 |
|
| 0 | 1(0.8%) | 2(1.6%) | 2(3.2%) | 5(1.5%) | 0.2 | |
|
| 0 | 2(1.5%) | 2(1.6%) | 2(3.2%) | 6(1.7%) | 0.1 | |
|
| 0 | 2(1.5%) | 1(0.8%) | 1 (1.68%) | 4 (1.2%) | 0.01 | |
|
| 10 (41.6%) | 26(20.5%) | 28(22 %) | 16(25.4%) | 80 (23.5%) | 0.001 | |
|
| 1(4.2%) | 4(3.2%) | 6(4.7%) | 0 | 11(3. 2%) | 0.01 | |
|
| 1(4.2%) | 20(15.7%) | 18(14.2%) | 12(19%) | 51(15%) | 0.03 | |
|
| 6 (25%) | 20(15.7%) | 18(14.2%) | 14(22.2%) | 58 (17.7%) | 0.02 | |
|
| 5(20.8%) | 14 (11%) | 18(14.2%) | 4(6.3%) | 41 (12%) | 0.001 | |
|
| 0 | 12(9.5%) | 16 (12.6%) | 5(8%) | 33(9.7%) | 0.01 | |
|
| 0 | 12 (9.5%) | 4 (3.2%) | 0 | 16 (4.7%) | 0.3 | |
|
| 0 | 12(9.5%) | 12 (9.5%) | 5(83%) | 29 (8.5%) | 0.4 | |
|
| 11.43±4.6 | 11.24±5.74 | 11.78±5.48 | 9.87±5.06 | - | 0.001 | |
Fig 1Comparison of FLAIR and DWI sequences in depiction of periventricular plaques
Fig 2Comparison of FLAIR and DWI sequences in depiction of centrum semiovale plaques