Literature DB >> 28277111

Inter-cycle and inter-observer variability of the antral follicle count in routine clinical practice.

Jessica Subirá1,2, Jose Alberola-Rubio1, María Jose Núñez1, Alicia Marzal Escrivá1,2,3, Antonio Pellicer1,2,3,4, Vicente Montañana1, César Díaz-García1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Antral follicle count (AFC) is a reliable predictor of ovarian response to stimulation and its inter-cycle and inter-observer variability has been extensively studied on in vitro fertilization (IVF), mostly in highly selected populations within studies not originally designed for this purpose. In this retrospective cohort study, we assess the inter-cycle variation of AFC in a setting similar to that of the daily practice. We included only patients undergoing mild stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI). One hundred and forty-eight patients had two (62 patients, group A), three (49 patients, group B) or four (37 patients, group C) IUI cycles and AFC was measured on early follicular phase of each cycle by one of the members of the medical team within daily practice. Intra-class correlation coefficients were used to estimate variability. Inter-cycle variability rendered ICCs above 0.70 in all groups improving along with the number of cycles [Group A ICC 0.78 (95%CI 0.66-0.86), Group B ICC 0.87 (95%CI 0.80-0.92) and Group C ICC 0.91 (95%CI 0.85-0.95)]. Inter-observer variability showed a high degree of concordance with ICCs above 0.95. We provide the closest approximation to real inter-cycle and inter-observer AFC variability expected in routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART; Antral follicle count; ovarian reserve; sonography; variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28277111     DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1291614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  5 in total

1.  Fertility preservation in women with malignancies: the accuracy of antral follicle count collected randomly during the menstrual cycle in predicting the number of oocytes retrieved.

Authors:  Francesca Filippi; Fabio Martinelli; Alessio Paffoni; Marco Reschini; Francesco Raspagliesi; Edgardo Somigliana
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Beverage intake and ovarian reserve among women from a fertility center.

Authors:  Ana B Maldonado-Cárceles; Makiko Mitsunami; Andrea Florio; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Irene Souter; Jorge E Chavarro; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 7.490

3.  Reliability of AMH and AFC measurements and their correlation: a large multicenter study.

Authors:  Philippe Arvis; Catherine Rongières; Olivier Pirrello; Philippe Lehert
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Age-Specific Distribution of Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Antral Follicle Count in Indian Infertile Women.

Authors:  Devika Gunasheela; Rajaam Murali; Lohith Chengappa Appaneravanda; Brigitte Gerstl; Arun Kumar; Nishanthini Sengeetha; Hita Nayak; P M Chandrikadevi
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Low Prognosis by the POSEIDON Criteria in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Multicenter and Multinational Prevalence Study of Over 13,000 Patients.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Hakan Yarali; Lan N Vuong; José F Carvalho; İrem Y Özbek; Mehtap Polat; Ho L Le; Toan D Pham; Tuong M Ho
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.555

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.