| Literature DB >> 28276928 |
Chiung-Chi Cheng1, Wei-Ting Chao2, Chen-Chun Liao2, Yu-Hui Tseng2, Yen-Chang Clark Lai3, Yih-Shyong Lai4, Yung-Hsiang Hsu5, Yi-Hsiang Liu6.
Abstract
Plectin involved in activation of kinases in cell signaling pathway and plays important role in cell morphology and migration. Plectin knockdown promotes cell migration by activating focal adhesion kinase and Rac1-GTPase activity in liver cells. Sorafenib is a multi-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor that improves patient survival on hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between the expression of plectin and cell migration as well as the sensitivity of hepatoma cell lines exposing to sorafenib. Hepatoma cell lines PLC/PRF/5 and HepG2 were used to examine the level of plectin expression and cell migration in comparison with Chang liver cell line. In addition, sensitivity of the 3 cell lines to sorafenib treatment was also measured. Expression of plectin was lower in PLC/PRF/5 and HepG2 hepatoma cells than that of Chang liver cells whereas HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells exhibit higher rate of cell migration in trans-well migration assay. Immunohistofluorecent staining on E-cadherin revealed the highest rate of collective cell migration in HepG2 cells and the lowest was found in Chang liver cells. Likewise, HepG2 cell line was most sensitive to sorafenib treatment and Chang liver cells exhibited the least sensitivity. The drug sensitivity to sorafenib treatment showed inverse correlation with the expression of plectin. We suggest that plectin deficiency and increased E-cadherin in hepatoma cells were associated with higher rates of cell motility, collective cell migration as well as higher drug sensitivity to sorafenib treatment.Entities:
Keywords: E-cadherin; collective cell migration; cytoskeleton; hepatocellular carcinoma; plectin; sorafenib
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28276928 PMCID: PMC5810502 DOI: 10.1080/19336918.2017.1288789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Adh Migr ISSN: 1933-6918 Impact factor: 3.405
Figure 1.Plectin expression in liver and hepatoma cell lines. (A) Localization of plectin identified by immunofluorescent staining. Red: nucleus. Green: plectin. (B) Western blotting analysis of plectin protein expression in Chang liver cells, PLC/PRF/5, and HepG2 cell lines. (C) Quantification on the level of plectin expression.
Figure 2.Individual cell migration in liver and hepatoma cell lines. (A) Chang liver cells, PLC/PRF/5, and HepG2 cell lines were subjected to transwell migration assay described in Materials and methods. Cell migration was visualized with DAPI staining. (B) Quantification on the rate of cell migration. HepG2 cells showed higher individual cell migration without significant difference (p > 0.05).
Figure 3.Collective cell migration associated with E-cadherin expression and plectin deficiency. (A) Western blotting assay of E-cadherin expression in Chang liver cells, PLC/PRF/5, and HepG2 cell lines. (B) Quantification data of E-cadherin expression obtained from Western blotting analysis. HepG2 cells showed highest level of E-cadherin expression compared with Chang and PLC/PRF/5 cells (p < 0.05). (C) Immunofluorescent staining for detecting the distribution of E-cadherin in collective migrated cells. Blue: nucleus. Red: E-cadherin. (D) Quantification of collective cell migration in transwell assay. Cell area appearing more than 3 cells connected with E-cadherin was calculated as collective cell migration. The result of quantification showed significant differences (p < 0.05). (E) Western blotting assay of plectin and E-cadherin expression in mock (Mock) and plectin knockdown-Chang liver cells (Plectin KD), respectively. (F) Quantification data of E-cadherin expression obtained from Western blotting analysis. Plectin knockdown-cells showed higher level of E-cadherin expression compared with mock cells (p < 0.05).
Figure 4.Sorafenib treatment in liver cells, hepatoma cells, and plectin knockdown-liver cells. (A) Sorafenib (from 0 to 10 μM) was applied in Chang liver cells, PLC/PRF/5 and HepG2 cell lines. Cell viabilities were determined in 72 hours. The data showed that HepG2 cells were more sensitive to sorafenib treatment than Chang liver cells and PLC/PRF/5 cell lines were. (B) Reduction in mRNA expression of Chang liver cells was associated with transient knockdown of plectin. (C) Sorafenib (10 μM) was applied in mock and plectin knockdown-Chang liver cell respectively. Plectin knockdown-cells revealed significantly higher sensitivity to sorafenib treatment (p < 0.05).