Literature DB >> 28276851

Predicting the actigraphy-based acrophase using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) in college students of North Italy.

Eliana Roveda1, Jacopo Vitale2, Angela Montaruli1, Letizia Galasso1, Franca Carandente1, Andrea Caumo1,3.   

Abstract

Actigraphy is the reference objective method to measure circadian rhythmicity. One simpler subjective approach to assess the circadian typology is the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) by Horne and Ostberg. In this study, we compared the MEQ score against the actigraphy-based circadian parameters MESOR, amplitude and acrophase in a sample of 54 students of the University of Milan in Northern Italy. MEQ and the acrophase resulted strongly and inversely associated (r = -0.84, p < 0.0001), and their relationship exhibited a clear-cut linear trend. We thus used linear regression to develop an equation enabling us to predict the value of the acrophase from the MEQ score. The parameters of the regression model were precisely estimated, with the slope of the regression line being significantly different from 0 (p < 0.0001). The best-fit linear equation was: acrophase (min) = 1238.7-5.49·MEQ, indicating that each additional point in the MEQ score corresponded to a shortening of the acrophase of approximately 5 min. The coefficient of determination, R2, was 0.70. The residuals were evenly distributed and did not show any systematic pattern, thus indicating that the linear model yielded a good, balanced prediction of the acrophase throughout the range of the MEQ score. In particular, the model was able to accurately predict the mean values of the acrophase in the three chronotypes (Morning-, Neither-, and Evening-types) in which the study subjects were categorized. Both the confidence and prediction limits associated to the regression line were calculated, thus providing an assessment of the uncertainty associated with the prediction of the model. In particular, the size of the two-sided prediction limits for the acrophase was about ±100 min in the midrange of the MEQ score. Finally, k-fold cross-validation showed that both the model's predictive ability on new data and the model's stability to changes in the data set used for parameter estimation were good. In conclusion, the actigraphy-based acrophase can be predicted using the MEQ score in a population of college students of North Italy.

Keywords:  Chronotype; Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ); actigraphy; activity levels; circadian rhythm

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28276851     DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2016.1276928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  9 in total

1.  Acute Modification of Cardiac Autonomic Function of High-Intensity Interval Training in Collegiate Male Soccer Players with Different Chronotype: A Cross-Over Study.

Authors:  Matteo Bonato; Luca Agnello; Letizia Galasso; Angela Montaruli; Eliana Roveda; Giampiero Merati; Antonio La Torre; Jacopo A Vitale
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Registration of 24-hour accelerometric rest-activity profiles and its application to human chronotypes.

Authors:  Erin I McDonnell; Vadim Zipunnikov; Jennifer A Schrack; Jeff Goldsmith; Julia Wrobel
Journal:  Biol Rhythm Res       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 1.362

3.  Chronotype and response to training during the polar night: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Eva Bjoerkesett; Andrea Campana; Giacomo Panizza; Andi Weydahl
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.228

4.  Effects of Environmental Change on Travelers' Sleep Health: Identifying Risk and Protective Factors.

Authors:  Wei Xiong; Fang Fan; Haiying Qi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-13

5.  Development and initial validation of the Morningness-Eveningness Exercise Preference Questionnaire (MEEPQ) in Japanese university students.

Authors:  Ryo Miyazaki; Hitoshi Ando; Tomoko Hamasaki; Yukito Higuchi; Kazushige Oshita; Tomoki Tashiro; Naoki Sakane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Chronotype Variability and Patterns of Light Exposure of a Large Cohort of United States Residents.

Authors:  Roberto Refinetti
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-06-27

7.  Is Abdominal Fat Distribution Associated with Chronotype in Adults Independently of Lifestyle Factors?

Authors:  Ramona De Amicis; Letizia Galasso; Alessandro Leone; Laila Vignati; Giulia De Carlo; Andrea Foppiani; Angela Montaruli; Eliana Roveda; Emiliano Cè; Fabio Esposito; Angelo Vanzulli; Alberto Battezzati; Simona Bertoli
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Ratings of Perceived Exertion and Self-reported Mood State in Response to High Intensity Interval Training. A Crossover Study on the Effect of Chronotype.

Authors:  Jacopo A Vitale; Antonio La Torre; Roberto Baldassarre; Maria F Piacentini; Matteo Bonato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 9.  Biological Rhythm and Chronotype: New Perspectives in Health.

Authors:  Angela Montaruli; Lucia Castelli; Antonino Mulè; Raffaele Scurati; Fabio Esposito; Letizia Galasso; Eliana Roveda
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-03-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.