OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after curative hepatectomy in improving the survival of patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized or nonrandomized studies comparing postoperative adjuvant TACE with curative resection alone. Meta-analysis was performed after converting time-event data into a hazard ratio (HR), using an inverse diversity model. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 retrospective studies matched the selection criteria, thereby including 3191 patients (779 in RCT, 2412 in observational studies) for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that receiving adjuvant TACE was associated with improved overall survival (OS, ln[HR] = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.63-0.78, p < .001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, ln[HR] = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.63-0.76, p < .001) after curative hepatectomies. The results of observational studies were consistent with those of RCTs. Furthermore, meta-regression was utilized to detect study-level factors associated with treatment outcome. It revealed that overall survival was similar among patients treated with various combinations of chemotherapeutic drugs. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that repeated TACE interventions do not provide a higher survival benefit compared with a single course, and patients with a single tumor or tumor size ≥5cm might stand to benefit the most from adjuvant TACE therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that postoperative adjuvant TACE could achieve higher OS and RFS than surgical resection alone. However, these results need to be validated through further high-quality clinical studies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after curative hepatectomy in improving the survival of patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized or nonrandomized studies comparing postoperative adjuvant TACE with curative resection alone. Meta-analysis was performed after converting time-event data into a hazard ratio (HR), using an inverse diversity model. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 retrospective studies matched the selection criteria, thereby including 3191 patients (779 in RCT, 2412 in observational studies) for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that receiving adjuvant TACE was associated with improved overall survival (OS, ln[HR] = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.63-0.78, p < .001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, ln[HR] = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.63-0.76, p < .001) after curative hepatectomies. The results of observational studies were consistent with those of RCTs. Furthermore, meta-regression was utilized to detect study-level factors associated with treatment outcome. It revealed that overall survival was similar among patients treated with various combinations of chemotherapeutic drugs. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that repeated TACE interventions do not provide a higher survival benefit compared with a single course, and patients with a single tumor or tumor size ≥5cm might stand to benefit the most from adjuvant TACE therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that postoperative adjuvant TACE could achieve higher OS and RFS than surgical resection alone. However, these results need to be validated through further high-quality clinical studies.
Authors: Kit-Fai Lee; Charing C N Chong; Anthony K W Fong; Andrew K Y Fung; Hon-Ting Lok; Yue-Sun Cheung; John Wong; Paul B S Lai Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 7.293