Literature DB >> 28276598

Clinical Utility of Using Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score to Adjust Fracture Probability: The Manitoba BMD Cohort.

Patrick Martineau1, William D Leslie2, Helena Johansson3,4, Anders Oden3, Eugene V McCloskey3, Didier Hans5, John A Kanis3,4.   

Abstract

Decreased lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS), a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived image texture measurement, is a risk factor for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) independent of 10-year fracture probability estimated using FRAX. We determined how often applying the TBS adjustment to fracture probability altered treatment qualification. Using a population-based registry containing all clinical DXA results for Manitoba, Canada, we identified 34,316 women with baseline spine and hip DXA, FRAX-based fracture probability measurements (computed with femoral neck bone mineral density), lumbar spine TBS, and minimum 5 years of observation (mean 8.7 years). Population-based health services data were used to identify incident non-traumatic MOF and HF in 3503 and 945 women, respectively. Baseline MOF and HF probabilities were estimated using FRAX before and after applying the TBS adjustment. Risk recategorization was assessed using net reclassification improvement (NRI) for individual FRAX-based intervention criteria and three national clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) (US National Osteoporosis Foundation, Osteoporosis Canada, and UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group). Overall, proportions of women reclassified with the TBS adjustment to FRAX were small (less than 5%) with more than 90% of the reclassification occurring close to the intervention threshold. For women close to an intervention cut-off reclassification, rates ranged from 9.0% to 17.9% and were <1% otherwise. There was a small but significant improvement in overall NRI for all individual FRAX-based intervention criteria (range 0.007 to 0.018) and all three national CPGs (range 0.008 to 0.011). NRI was larger in women below age 65 years (up to 0.056 for hip fracture). In summary, a small but significant improvement in MOF and HF risk assessment was found by using lumbar spine TBS to adjust FRAX probability. An improvement in risk reclassification was observed for CPGs from three different countries, with almost all of the benefit found in individuals close to an intervention threshold.
© 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28276598     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  17 in total

1.  Cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture as an independent predictor of incident fracture risk in older women and men in the Bone Microarchitecture International Consortium (BoMIC): a prospective study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Kerry E Broe; Hanfei Xu; Laiji Yang; Steven Boyd; Emmanuel Biver; Pawel Szulc; Jonathan Adachi; Shreyasee Amin; Elizabeth Atkinson; Claudie Berger; Lauren Burt; Roland Chapurlat; Thierry Chevalley; Serge Ferrari; David Goltzman; David A Hanley; Marian T Hannan; Sundeep Khosla; Ching-Ti Liu; Mattias Lorentzon; Dan Mellstrom; Blandine Merle; Maria Nethander; René Rizzoli; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Bert Van Rietbergen; Daniel Sundh; Andy Kin On Wong; Claes Ohlsson; Serkalem Demissie; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 32.069

2.  Comparison of Methods for Improving Fracture Risk Assessment in Diabetes: The Manitoba BMD Registry.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Helena Johansson; Eugene V McCloskey; Nicholas C Harvey; John A Kanis; Didier Hans
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Osteoporosis Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Screening in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  In which patients does lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) have the largest effect?

Authors:  P Martineau; W D Leslie; H Johansson; N C Harvey; E V McCloskey; D Hans; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Assessment of bone quality in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  N Jiang; W Xia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Premenopausal and early postmenopausal trabecular bone score (TBS) and fracture risk: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; MeiHua Huang; Jane A Cauley; Sioban Harlow; Joel S Finkelstein; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Risk-equivalent T-score adjustment for using lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS): the Manitoba BMD registry.

Authors:  W D Leslie; E Shevroja; H Johansson; E V McCloskey; N C Harvey; J A Kanis; D Hans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Less strict intervention thresholds for the FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX predict clinical fractures in osteopenic postmenopausal women with no prior fractures.

Authors:  Martin Kužma; Didier Hans; Tomáš Koller; Eva Némethová; Peter Jackuliak; Zdenko Killinger; Heinrich Resch; Juraj Payer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 10.  The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Emőke Šteňová; Olivier Lamy
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.