| Literature DB >> 28276495 |
Xu Lu1,2,3, Zhichang Zheng1, Song Miao2, Huang Li1, Zebin Guo1,3, Yi Zhang1,3, Yafeng Zheng1,3, Baodong Zheng1,3, Jianbo Xiao1,4.
Abstract
Lotus seeds were identified by the Ministry of Public Health of China as both food and medicine. One general function of lotus seeds is to improve intestinal health. However, to date, studies evaluating the relationship between bioactive compounds in lotus seeds and the physiological activity of the intestine are limited. In the present study, by using medium pressure liquid chromatography coupled with evaporative light-scattering detector and diode-array detector, five oligosaccharides were isolated and their structures were further characterized by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. In vitro testing determined that LOS3-1 and LOS4 elicited relatively good proliferative effects on Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus. These results indicated a structure-function relationship between the physiological activity of oligosaccharides in lotus seeds and the number of probiotics applied, thus providing room for improvement of this particular feature. Intestinal probiotics may potentially become a new effective drug target for the regulation of immunity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28276495 PMCID: PMC5343441 DOI: 10.1038/srep44174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the HILIC-diode array detector (DAD)-ELSD system.
It was drawn and taken by Dr. Xu Lu.
Figure 2A diagram illustrating the interaction of compounds in the stationary phase and mobile phase in the amide-type hydrophilic chromatographic column.
Figure 3The partition chromatogram of eacholigosaccharide component in lotus seeds with different flow rates (the sample concentration is 0.2 g/mL, the acetonitrile concentration is 85–65%, the variation rate is 2/3%/min), (A) 30 mL/min; (B) 45 mL/min; (C) 60 mL/min.
Figure 4The DAD spectrum of the solution at a flow rate of 30 mL/min at a specific time.
Figure 5Partition chromatographic diagram of each oligosaccharide component in lotus seeds under different sample concentration conditions (the sample concentration is 0.4 g/mL, the acetonitrile concentration is 85–65%, the flow rate is 30 mL/min).
Figure 6Partition chromatographic diagram of each oligosaccharide component in lotus seeds under different acetonitrile concentration conditions (the sample concentration is 0.2 g/mL, the acetonitrile concentration is 85–65%, the flow rate is 30 mL/min, the ratio of acetonitrile is 65%).
Figure 7A secondary partition chromatographic diagram of each collected oligosaccharide component in lotus seeds (the acetonitrile concentration is 85–65%, and the flow rate is 30 mL/min).
Figure 8The HPLC chromatographic spectrum of each oligosaccharide component in lotus seeds.
Figure 9The Q-TOF-MS analytical results of oligosaccharide compound 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in lotus seeds.
The Q-TOF-MS analytical results of each oligosaccharide compound in lotus seeds.
| Numbers | Mass fragments (m/z) | Adduct ion | Molecular formula | Matching degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 181.0716 | [M − H]− | C6H14O6 | 99.60 |
| 2 | 365.1052 | [M + Na]+ | C12H22O11 | 99.68 |
| 381.0472 | [M + Ka]+ | |||
| 3–1 | 527.1950 | [M + Na]+ | C18H32O16 | 99.52 |
| 543.1257 | [M + Ka]+ | |||
| 3–2 | 527.1859 | [M + Na]+ | C18H32O16 | 99.51 |
| 543.1328 | [M + Ka]+ | |||
| 4 | 689.2116 | [M + Na]+ | C24H42O21 | 99.35 |
| 705.2048 | [M + Ka]+ |
Figure 10GC–MS profiles of methylated lotus seeds oligosaccharides (A) LOS2; (B) LOS3-1; (C) LOS3-2; (D) LOS4.
Linkage analysis of LOS2, LOS3-1, LOS3-2, and LOS4 isolated from lotus seeds.
| Numbers | Methylation fragments | Connection method | Mass fragments(m/z) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2,5-Anhydro-1,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl-D-mannitol | →2)-Fru | 41, 43, 45, 55, 59, 71, 75, 83, 85, 89, 99, 101, 111, 115, 125, 126, 143, 155, 156, 157, 175, 188, 221 |
| 2 | 2,5-Anhydro-1,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl-D-glucitol | →2)-Fru | 41, 43, 45, 55, 59, 71, 75, 83, 87, 89, 99, 101, 111, 115, 125, 126, 143, 221 |
| 3 | 1,5-Di-O-acetyl-2,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl-D-mannitol | Man | 43,45,87,101,117,129,145,161,205 |
| 4 | 1,5,6-tri-O-acetyl-2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-D-mannitol | →6)-Man | 43,87,99,101,113,117,129,161,173,189 |
| 5 | 1,5,6-tri-O-acetyl-2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-D-glucitol | →6)-Glc | 43, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 161, 189, 233 |
| 6 | 1,5-Di-O-acetyl-2,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl-D-galactitol | Gal | 43,59,71,87,101,102,118,129,145,161,162,205 |
| 7 | 1,4,5-tri-O-acetyl-2,3,6-tri-O-methyl-D-glucitol | →4)-Glc | 43, 45, 87, 101, 117, 131, 161, 233 |
Identification of the O-methylated alditol acetates derived from LOS2, LOS3-1, LOS3-2, and LOS4 isolated from lotus seeds.
| Connection method | 2 | 3–1 | 3–2 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| →2)-Fru | — | 17.335 min | — | 17.346 min |
| →2)-Fru | — | 17.476 min | — | 17.524 min |
| Man | — | 17.169 min | 17.151 min | 17.152 min |
| →6)-Man | — | — | 18.141 min | 18.122 min |
| →6)-Glc | — | 22.163 min | 22.179 min | 22.155 min |
| Gal | 19.300 min | — | — | — |
| →4)-Glc | 23.412 min | — | — | — |
Figure 11Growth curves of L. delbrueckii ssp. Bulgaricus incubated for 24 h in media containing Glc, LOS3-1, LOS3-2, LOS4, FOS.
*Error bars represent the standard deviation of replicates (n = 3).
Concentration of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) produced in the fermentation media with different carbon sources.
| Carbon source | Time(h) | Acetic acid (mmol) | Lactic acid (mmol) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 10 | 2.001 (0.132)fg | 11.916 (0.623)b |
| 24 | 1.999 (0.009)fg | 12.081 (0.584)b | |
| LOS3–1 | 10 | 2.429 (0.055)ef | 38.183 (1.498)e |
| 24 | 2.468 (0.055)ef | 37.633 (1.282)ef | |
| LOS3–2 | 10 | 1.687 (0.099)g | 28.179 (1.016)g |
| 24 | 1.877 (0.094)fg | 30.193 (1.282)fg | |
| LOS4 | 10 | 3.015 (0.028)de | 53.903 (0.247)d |
| 24 | 3.431 (0.193)cd | 70.971 (3.480)c | |
| Glc | 10 | 11.280 (0.757)a | 155.711 (4.565)b |
| 24 | 11.392 (0.558)a | 172.709 (9.804)a | |
| FOS | 10 | 4.051 (0.120)bc | 30.083 (1.072 )g |
| 24 | 4.672 (0.009)b | 44.040 (2.073 )e |
*Results are expressed as mean standard deviation; values represent the average of triplicate analyses from three runs (n = 3). Lower case letters within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Standard curve equations of SCFAs.
| Short-chain fatty acids | Retention time (min) | Standard curve function | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetic acid | 8.986 ± 0.075 | 0.999 | |
| Propionic acid | 9.986 ± 0.066 | 0.999 | |
| Lactate acid | 13.042 ± 0.006 | 0.999 | |
| Isobutyrate acid | 10.271 ± 0.083 | 0.999 | |
| Butyric acid | 11.087 ± 0.047 | 0.999 | |
| Isovalerate acid | 11.544 ± 0.029 | 0.999 | |
| Pentanoic acid | 12.414 ± 0.020 | 0.999 |
x is the concentration of fatty acid, mmol/L; Y is the peak area in the spectrum.