Literature DB >> 28276148

Direct aspiration versus follicular flushing in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomised controlled trial.

B Haydardedeoglu1, F Gjemalaj1, P C Aytac1, E B Kilicdag1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare follicle flushing three times with direct follicular aspiration in poor responders. Our hypothesis was that follicle flushing three times in poor responders would result in similar oocyte yield compared with direct aspiration in poor responders.
DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial performed between January 2015 and June 2015.
SETTING: University hospital. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Eighty eligible poor responders, who were defined as having five or fewer follicles ≥13 mm in average diameter with at least two follicles having maximum diameters >17 mm on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration. Monofollicular cycles, including natural cycles, were excluded from the current trial.
METHODS: In the double-lumen needle group, oocyte retrieval was performed by flushing three times with 2 ml in each follicle and in the single-lumen group direct follicle aspiration was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved.
RESULTS: The mean number of metaphase II oocytes was similar in both groups (1.9 ± 0.1 versus 2.1 ± 0.1, respectively). The clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar in both groups (32.5% versus 25% and 25% versus 22.5%, respectively). The only significant difference between the two groups was the duration of oocyte retrieval (178.4 ± 13.4 versus 236.3 ± 24.1 seconds, respectively, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Follicular flushing is time consuming and has similar results compared with direct follicle aspiration in poor responders. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Direct follicle aspiration versus flushing in poor responders yields similar metaphase II oocytes.
© 2017 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  follicular flushing; in vitro fertilisation/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection; live birth rate; metaphase II oocyte; poor responders

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28276148     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  4 in total

1.  Follicular Flushing Versus Direct Aspiration at Oocyte Retrieval in Poor Responders Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Neena Malhotra; Chithira Pulimoottil Vignarajan; Disket Dolkar; Reeta Mahey; Perumal Vanamail
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 2.  Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques.

Authors:  Ektoras X Georgiou; Pedro Melo; Julie Brown; Ingrid E Granne
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-26

3.  Follicular flushing increases the number of oocytes retrieved in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Xiao; Yong Wang; Min Wang; Kai Liu
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Follicular flushing leads to higher oocyte yield in monofollicular IVF: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A S Kohl Schwartz; I Calzaferri; M Roumet; A Limacher; A Fink; A Wueest; S Weidlinger; V R Mitter; B Leeners; M Von Wolff
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.