Literature DB >> 28275850

Analysis of Swedish Forest Owners' Information and Knowledge-Sharing Networks for Decision-Making: Insights for Climate Change Communication and Adaptation.

Karin André1, Julia Baird2, Åsa Gerger Swartling3, Gregor Vulturius3,4, Ryan Plummer2,5.   

Abstract

To further the understanding of climate change adaptation processes, more attention needs to be paid to the various contextual factors that shape whether and how climate-related knowledge and information is received and acted upon by actors involved. This study sets out to examine the characteristics of forest owners' in Sweden, the information and knowledge-sharing networks they draw upon for decision-making, and their perceptions of climate risks, their forests' resilience, the need for adaptation, and perceived adaptive capacity. By applying the concept of ego-network analysis, the empirical data was generated by a quantitative survey distributed to 3000 private forest owners' in Sweden in 2014 with a response rate of 31%. The results show that there is a positive correlation, even though it is generally weak, between forest owner climate perceptions and (i) network features, i.e. network size and heterogeneity, and (ii) presence of certain alter groups (i.e. network members or actors). Results indicate that forest owners' social networks currently serve only a minimal function of sharing knowledge of climate change and adaptation. Moreover, considering the fairly infrequent contact between respondents and alter groups, the timing of knowledge sharing is important. In conclusion we suggest those actors that forest owners' most frequently communicate with, especially forestry experts providing advisory services (e.g. forest owner associations, companies, and authorities) have a clear role to communicate both the risks of climate change and opportunities for adaptation. Peers are valuable in connecting information about climate risks and adaptation to the actual forest property.

Keywords:  Communication; Decision-making; Ego-network analysis; Forest management; Knowledge; Risk perception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28275850     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0844-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

1.  IPCC Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX).

Authors:  Virginia Murray; Kristie L Ebi
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation.

Authors:  Susanne C Moser; Julia A Ekstrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management.

Authors:  Nathan James Bennett
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature.

Authors:  Adam Baumgart-Getz; Linda Stalker Prokopy; Kristin Floress
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions.

Authors:  Matthew C Nisbet; Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting.

Authors:  Kristina Blennow; Johannes Persson; Margarida Tomé; Marc Hanewinkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Social network analysis of multi-level linkages: a Swedish case study on Northern Forest-Based sectors.

Authors:  E Carina H Keskitalo; Julia Baird; Emmeline Laszlo Ambjörnsson; Ryan Plummer
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.129

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.