| Literature DB >> 28275662 |
Jing Wang1, Yue Zhang1, Qiuzhen Zhu2, Yulan Liu1, Hao Cheng1, Yuefan Zhang2, Tiejun Li2.
Abstract
This paper contains the experiment data on the emodin, mice and cell survival rate, mice intestinal tissue H&E and TUNEL staining, the expression of p53 protein in mice small intestine, cell apoptosis, the expression of protein and RNA in vitro included. Data was worked out through MTT assay, Flow cytometry, Western blot, Real-time PCR and Staining.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28275662 PMCID: PMC5328685 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.12.038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Experimental design schematic picture for animal survival rate (A) and emodin protects mice against radiation-induced death after 9Gy total body irradiation (B). (n=10; *p<0.05, emodin treatment group vs. radiation group).
Fig. 2Data on emodin treatment (30 mg/kg/day) attenuate radiation-induced (7Gy) intestinal injury in mice. (A)(B) Representative micrographs of H&E-stained sections of the proximal jejunum. Significant changes were observed emodin treatment attenuated jejunum injury at 7 days post-irradiation. (C) Emodin pretreatment significant increases the villus length and crypts as well as reduces goblet cells number in the irradiated mice at 7 days after 7Gy TBI. (n=5; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, control group vs. radiation group; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, emodin treatment group vs. radiation group.).
Fig. 3Apoptotic changes in crypt (A) and villi (B) of jejunum tissue. Original magnification 200x.(C)Quantification of TUNEL-positive cells in crypt and villus per group. Values are presented as mean±SEM (n=5;##p<0.01, control group vs.radiation group;*p<0.05,**p<0.01,emodin treatment group vs. radiation group.).
Fig. 4Data on emodin suppresses the radiation-induced expression of p53 for 7 days in the small intestine. Values are presented as the mean±SEM. (n=5; ##p<0.01, control group vs.radiation group; *p<0.05, emodin treatment group vs. radiation group).
Fig. 5Data on Emodin increased cell viability and reduced apoptosis of HUVECs after gamma irradiation (24Gy). (A)Improvement in the HUVECs survival rate after irradiation in the emodin-treated group (10, 1, and 0.1 µM). (B)and(D) Annexin V/PI double staining assessed using flow cytometry. (C)and(E)Hoechst 33258 staining was performed to evaluate apoptosis in the HUVECs. Emodin was added at 24 h prior to exposure to radiation, then both cell viability and cell apoptosis were analyzed at 24 h post-irradiation. Values are presented as the mean±SEM (n=3;p<0.05,p<0.01, p<0.001,control group vs. radiation group; p<0.05,p<0.01, emodin treatment group vs .radiation group).
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was required | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experiment features | |
| Data source lacation | |
| Data accessibility |