Andrew J Bower1, Benjamin Chidester2, Joanne Li3, Youbo Zhao4, Marina Marjanovic3, Eric J Chaney4, Minh N Do5, Stephen A Boppart6. 1. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 3. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 4. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 5. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. 6. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multimodal optical microscopy, a set of imaging techniques based on unique, yet complementary contrast mechanisms and spatially and temporally co-registered data acquisition, has emerged as a powerful biomedical tool. However, the analysis of the dense, high-dimensional datasets acquired by these instruments remains mostly qualitative and restricted to analysis of each modality individually. METHODS: Using a custom-built multimodal nonlinear optical microscope, high dimensional datasets were acquired for automated classification of functional cell states as well as identification of histopathological features in tissues slices. Supervised classification of cell death modes was performed through support vector machines (SVM) and semi-supervised classification of tissue slices was performed through the use of the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. RESULTS: Applications of these techniques to the automated classification of cell death modes as well as to the identification of tissue components in fixed ex vivo tissue slices are presented. The analysis techniques developed provide a direct link between multimodal image contrast and biological structure and function, resulting in highly accurate classification in both settings. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of multimodal optical microscopy images through statistical modeling of the high dimensional data acquired gives a strong correlation between biological structure and function and image contrast. These methods are sensitive to the identification of diagnostic, cellular-level features important in a variety of clinical settings.
BACKGROUND: Multimodal optical microscopy, a set of imaging techniques based on unique, yet complementary contrast mechanisms and spatially and temporally co-registered data acquisition, has emerged as a powerful biomedical tool. However, the analysis of the dense, high-dimensional datasets acquired by these instruments remains mostly qualitative and restricted to analysis of each modality individually. METHODS: Using a custom-built multimodal nonlinear optical microscope, high dimensional datasets were acquired for automated classification of functional cell states as well as identification of histopathological features in tissues slices. Supervised classification of cell death modes was performed through support vector machines (SVM) and semi-supervised classification of tissue slices was performed through the use of the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. RESULTS: Applications of these techniques to the automated classification of cell death modes as well as to the identification of tissue components in fixed ex vivo tissue slices are presented. The analysis techniques developed provide a direct link between multimodal image contrast and biological structure and function, resulting in highly accurate classification in both settings. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of multimodal optical microscopy images through statistical modeling of the high dimensional data acquired gives a strong correlation between biological structure and function and image contrast. These methods are sensitive to the identification of diagnostic, cellular-level features important in a variety of clinical settings.
Authors: Javier Adur; Vitor B Pelegati; Leverson F L Costa; Luciana Pietro; Andre A de Thomaz; Diogo B Almeida; Fatima Bottcher-Luiz; Liliana A L A Andrade; Carlos L Cesar Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Benedikt W Graf; Eric J Chaney; Marina Marjanovic; Steven G Adie; Michael De Lisio; M Carmen Valero; Marni D Boppart; Stephen A Boppart Journal: Technology Date: 2013-09-24
Authors: Yinyin Yuan; Henrik Failmezger; Oscar M Rueda; H Raza Ali; Stefan Gräf; Suet-Feung Chin; Roland F Schwarz; Christina Curtis; Mark J Dunning; Helen Bardwell; Nicola Johnson; Sarah Doyle; Gulisa Turashvili; Elena Provenzano; Sam Aparicio; Carlos Caldas; Florian Markowetz Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Javier Adur; Vitor B Pelegati; Andre A de Thomaz; Mariana O Baratti; Diogo B Almeida; L A L A Andrade; Fátima Bottcher-Luiz; Hernandes F Carvalho; Carlos L Cesar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrew J Bower; Carlos Renteria; Joanne Li; Marina Marjanovic; Ronit Barkalifa; Stephen A Boppart Journal: Appl Phys Lett Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Venera Weinhardt; Jian-Hua Chen; Axel A Ekman; Jessica Guo; Soumya G Remesh; Michal Hammel; Gerry McDermott; Weilun Chao; Sharon Oh; Mark A Le Gros; Carolyn A Larabell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.752