Literature DB >> 28275253

Minimum alcohol pricing policies in practice: A critical examination of implementation in Canada.

Kara Thompson1,2, Tim Stockwell3, Ashley Wettlaufer4, Norman Giesbrecht5, Gerald Thomas3,6.   

Abstract

There is an interest globally in using Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) of alcohol to promote public health. Canada is the only country to have both implemented and evaluated some forms of minimum alcohol prices, albeit in ways that fall short of MUP. To inform these international debates, we describe the degree to which minimum alcohol prices in Canada meet recommended criteria for being an effective public health policy. We collected data on the implementation of minimum pricing with respect to (1) breadth of application, (2) indexation to inflation and (3) adjustments for alcohol content. Some jurisdictions have implemented recommended practices with respect to minimum prices; however, the full harm reduction potential of minimum pricing is not fully realised due to incomplete implementation. Key concerns include the following: (1) the exclusion of minimum prices for several beverage categories, (2) minimum prices below the recommended minima and (3) prices are not regularly adjusted for inflation or alcohol content. We provide recommendations for best practices when implementing minimum pricing policy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; alcohol; health policy; minimum price; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28275253     DOI: 10.1057/s41271-016-0051-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Policy        ISSN: 0197-5897            Impact factor:   2.222


  6 in total

1.  How many alcohol-attributable deaths and hospital admissions could be prevented by alternative pricing and taxation policies? Modelling impacts on alcohol consumption, revenues and related harms in Canada.

Authors:  Tim Stockwell; Samuel Churchill; Adam Sherk; Justin Sorge; Paul Gruenewald
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Spirits purchasing and marijuana use behaviors of risky drinkers in the state of Washington from 2014 to 2016.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Yu Ye; Thomas K Greenfield
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Prospective Analysis of Minimum Pricing Policies to Reduce Excessive Alcohol Use and Related Harms in U.S. States.

Authors:  Jennifer LeClercq; Stephanie Bernard; Francesca Mucciaccio; Marissa B Esser
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol.

Authors:  Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Clare Beeston; Andrew Millard; Ross Forsyth; Paolo Deluca; Colin Drummond; Douglas Eadie; Lesley Graham; Shona Hilton; Anne Ludbrook; Gerry McCartney; Thomas Phillips; Martine Stead; Allison Ford; Lyndal Bond; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Adapting existing behaviour: Perceptions of substance switching and implementation of minimum pricing for alcohol in Wales.

Authors:  Wulf Livingston; Katy Holloway; Tom May; Marian Buhociu; Iolo Madoc-Jones; Andy Perkins
Journal:  Nordisk Alkohol Nark       Date:  2020-12-20

Review 6.  Alcohol Control Policy in Europe: Overview and Exemplary Countries.

Authors:  Nino Berdzuli; Carina Ferreira-Borges; Antoni Gual; Jürgen Rehm
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.