Literature DB >> 28274617

Predictive Model of Surgical Time for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Albert Wu1, Michael J Weaver2, Marilyn M Heng3, Richard D Urman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maximizing operating room utilization in orthopedic and other surgeries relies on accurate estimates of surgical control time (SCT). A variety of case and patient-specific variables can influence the duration of surgical time during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that these variables are better predictors of actual SCT (aSCT) than a surgeon's own prediction (pSCT).
METHODS: All revision THAs from October 2008 to September 2014 from one institution were accessed. Variables for each case included aSCT, pSCT, patient age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status class, active infection, periprosthetic fracture, bone loss, heterotopic ossification, and implantation/explantation of a well-fixed acetabular/femoral component. These were incorporated in a stepwise fashion into a multivariate regression model for aSCT with a significant cutoff of 0.15. This was compared to a univariate regression model of aSCT that only used pSCT.
RESULTS: In total, 516 revision THAs were analyzed. After stepwise selection, patient age and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status were excluded from the model. The most significant increase in aSCT was seen with implantation of a new femoral component (24.0 min), followed by explantation of a well-fixed femoral component (18.7 min) and significant bone loss (15.0 min). Overall, the multivariate model had an improved r2 of 0.49, compared to 0.16 from only using pSCT.
CONCLUSION: A multivariate regression model can assist surgeons in more accurately predicting the duration of revision THAs. The strongest predictors of increased aSCT are explantation of a well-fixed femoral component, placement of an entirely new femoral component, and presence of significant bone loss.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  operating room management; prediction; scheduling; surgical time; total hip arthroplasty; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28274617     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  2 in total

1.  Predicting surgical operative time in primary total knee arthroplasty utilizing machine learning models.

Authors:  Ingwon Yeo; Christian Klemt; Christopher M Melnic; Meghan H Pattavina; Bruna M Castro De Oliveira; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Favourable clinical outcomes following cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 10 years.

Authors:  Weiguang Yu; Meiji Chen; Xianshang Zeng; Mingdong Zhao; Xinchao Zhang; Junxing Ye; Jintao Zhuang; Guowei Han
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.