R J Klement1, M Guckenberger2, H Alheid3, M Allgäuer4, G Becker5, O Blanck6, J Boda-Heggemann7, T Brunner8, M Duma9, S Gerum10, D Habermehl11, G Hildebrandt12, V Lewitzki13, C Ostheimer14, A Papachristofilou15, C Petersen16, T Schneider17, R Semrau18, S Wachter19, N Andratschke20. 1. Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Department of Radiation Oncology, Germany. 2. University Hospital Zürich, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Strahlentherapie Bautzen, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 4. Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Radiation Oncology, Regensburg, Germany. 5. RadioChirurgicum CyberKnife Südwest, Radiation Oncology, Göppingen, Germany. 6. Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Radiation Oncology, Kiel/Lübeck, Germany. 7. University Hospital Mannheim, Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Germany. 8. University Hospital Freiburg, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 9. Klinikum rechts der Isar- Technische Universität München, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich - LMU Munich, Germany. 11. University Hospital Heidelberg, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 12. University Hospital Rostock, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 13. University Hospital Würzburg, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 14. University Hospital Halle, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 15. University Hospital Basel, Radiation Oncology, Switzerland. 16. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 17. Strahlenzentrum Hamburg, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 18. University Hospital of Cologne, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 19. Klinikum Passau, Radiation Oncology, Germany. 20. University Hospital Zürich, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: nicolaus.andratschke@usz.ch.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is applied in the oligometastatic setting to treat liver metastases. However, factors influencing tumor control probability (TCP) other than radiation dose have not been thoroughly investigated. Here we set out to investigate such factors with a focus on the influence of histology and chemotherapy prior to SBRT using a large multi-center database from the German Society of Radiation Oncology. METHODS: 452 SBRT treatments in 363 patients were analyzed after collection of patient, tumor and treatment data in a multi-center database. Histology was considered through random effects in semi-parametric and parametric frailty models. Dose prescriptions were parametrized by conversion to the maximum biologically effective dose using alpha/beta of 10Gy (BEDmax). RESULTS: After adjusting for histology, BEDmax was the strongest predictor of TCP. Larger PTV volumes, chemotherapy prior to SBRT and simple motion management techniques predicted significantly lower TCP. The model predicted a BED of 209±67Gy10 necessary for 90% TCP at 2years with no prior chemotherapy, but 286±78Gy10 when chemotherapy had been given. Breast cancer metastases were significantly more responsive to SBRT compared to other histologies with 90% TCP at 2years achievable with BEDmax of 157±80Gy10 or 80±62Gy10 with and without prior chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Besides dose, histology and pretreatment chemotherapy were important factors influencing local TCP in this large cohort of liver metastases. After adjusting for prior chemotherapy, our data add to the emerging evidence that breast cancer metastases do respond better to hypofractionated SBRT compared to other histologies.
INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is applied in the oligometastatic setting to treat liver metastases. However, factors influencing tumor control probability (TCP) other than radiation dose have not been thoroughly investigated. Here we set out to investigate such factors with a focus on the influence of histology and chemotherapy prior to SBRT using a large multi-center database from the German Society of Radiation Oncology. METHODS: 452 SBRT treatments in 363 patients were analyzed after collection of patient, tumor and treatment data in a multi-center database. Histology was considered through random effects in semi-parametric and parametric frailty models. Dose prescriptions were parametrized by conversion to the maximum biologically effective dose using alpha/beta of 10Gy (BEDmax). RESULTS: After adjusting for histology, BEDmax was the strongest predictor of TCP. Larger PTV volumes, chemotherapy prior to SBRT and simple motion management techniques predicted significantly lower TCP. The model predicted a BED of 209±67Gy10 necessary for 90% TCP at 2years with no prior chemotherapy, but 286±78Gy10 when chemotherapy had been given. Breast cancer metastases were significantly more responsive to SBRT compared to other histologies with 90% TCP at 2years achievable with BEDmax of 157±80Gy10 or 80±62Gy10 with and without prior chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Besides dose, histology and pretreatment chemotherapy were important factors influencing local TCP in this large cohort of liver metastases. After adjusting for prior chemotherapy, our data add to the emerging evidence that breast cancer metastases do respond better to hypofractionated SBRT compared to other histologies.
Authors: Judit Boda-Heggemann; Anika Jahnke; Mark K H Chan; Leila S Ghaderi Ardekani; Peter Hunold; Jost Philipp Schäfer; Stefan Huttenlocher; Stefan Wurster; Dirk Rades; Guido Hildebrandt; Frank Lohr; Jürgen Dunst; Frederik Wenz; Oliver Blanck Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Susanne Stera; Panagiotis Balermpas; Mark K H Chan; Stefan Huttenlocher; Stefan Wurster; Christian Keller; Detlef Imhoff; Dirk Rades; Jürgen Dunst; Claus Rödel; Guido Hildebrandt; Oliver Blanck Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: V Dell'Acqua; A Surgo; F Kraja; J Kobiela; Maria Alessia Zerella; P Spychalski; S Gandini; C M Francia; D Ciardo; C Fodor; A M Ferrari; G Piperno; F Cattani; S Vigorito; F Pansini; W Petz; R Orecchia; M C Leonardi; B A Jereczek-Fossa Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Eleni Gkika; Iosif Strouthos; Simon Kirste; Sonja Adebahr; Michael Schultheiss; Dominik Bettinger; Ralph Fritsch; Volker Brass; Lars Maruschke; Hannes Philipp Neeff; Sven Arke Lang; Ursula Nestle; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Thomas Baptist Brunner Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Jesang Yu; Dong Hwan Kim; Jungbok Lee; Yong Moon Shin; Jong Hoon Kim; Sang Min Yoon; Jinhong Jung; Jin Cheon Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Seok-Byung Lim; In Ja Park; Tae Won Kim; Yong Sang Hong; Sun Young Kim; Jeong Eun Kim; Jin-Hong Park; So Yeon Kim Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 5.036
Authors: N Andratschke; H Alheid; M Allgäuer; G Becker; O Blanck; J Boda-Heggemann; T Brunner; M Duma; S Gerum; M Guckenberger; G Hildebrandt; R J Klement; V Lewitzki; C Ostheimer; A Papachristofilou; C Petersen; T Schneider; R Semrau; S Wachter; D Habermehl Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Julian C Hong; Diandra N Ayala-Peacock; Jason Lee; A William Blackstock; Paul Okunieff; Max W Sung; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Johnny Kao; James J Urbanic; Michael T Milano; Steven J Chmura; Joseph K Salama Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240