A Hennenfent1, S McGee2, K Dassie2, J Grant2, K Li2, K Zamore2, J Davies-Cole2, F Johnson-Clarke2. 1. CDC/CSTE Applied Epidemiology Fellowship Program, District of Columbia Department of Health, Center for Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: Andrew.Hennenfent@dc.gov. 2. District of Columbia Department of Health, Center for Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess Former Persons Under Monitoring (FPUM)s' experiences and perceptions of the United States (US) Ebola Active Monitoring Program. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective assessment survey of FPUM. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to FPUMs monitored in Washington, DC, during October 2014-September 2015 (n = 830). RESULTS: Most FPUMs (>70%) had a favourable perception of the program. Less than 5% avoided future travel or participation in outbreak response activities as a result of their monitoring experience. Approximately 29% experienced a negative consequence in the US due to their travel history. Only 19.2% reported that the Check and Report Ebola (CARE) phone was their only means of communication and 56.5% never used it for daily reporting. Experiences and perceptions varied significantly by citizenship with citizens of Ebola-affected countries more likely to have a favourable perception of the program, use CARE phones and express concern about Ebola transmission and development. CONCLUSIONS: FPUMs perceived the program as beneficial and undergoing monitoring was not a barrier to future travel. Negative consequences resulting from travel were frequent. Targeted distribution of resources (e.g. CARE phones) should be considered for future programs.
OBJECTIVES: To assess Former Persons Under Monitoring (FPUM)s' experiences and perceptions of the United States (US) Ebola Active Monitoring Program. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective assessment survey of FPUM. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to FPUMs monitored in Washington, DC, during October 2014-September 2015 (n = 830). RESULTS: Most FPUMs (>70%) had a favourable perception of the program. Less than 5% avoided future travel or participation in outbreak response activities as a result of their monitoring experience. Approximately 29% experienced a negative consequence in the US due to their travel history. Only 19.2% reported that the Check and Report Ebola (CARE) phone was their only means of communication and 56.5% never used it for daily reporting. Experiences and perceptions varied significantly by citizenship with citizens of Ebola-affected countries more likely to have a favourable perception of the program, use CARE phones and express concern about Ebola transmission and development. CONCLUSIONS: FPUMs perceived the program as beneficial and undergoing monitoring was not a barrier to future travel. Negative consequences resulting from travel were frequent. Targeted distribution of resources (e.g. CARE phones) should be considered for future programs.
Authors: Heather A Joseph; Abbey E Wojno; Kelly Winter; Onalee Grady-Erickson; Erin Hawes; Gabrielle A Benenson; Amanda Lee; Martin Cetron Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Joanna May Kesten; Suzanne Audrey; Maya Holding; Caroline Coope; Nick Young; Colin S Brown; Jenny Harries; Matthew Hickman; Isabel Oliver Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2018-06-27
Authors: Christine E Prue; Peyton N Williams; Heather A Joseph; Mihaela Johnson; Abbey E Wojno; Brittany A Zulkiewicz; John Macom; Jennifer P Alexander; Sarah E Ray; Brian G Southwell Journal: Inquiry Date: 2019 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730