| Literature DB >> 28273932 |
Jun Muratsu1,2, Masaaki Iwabayashi1, Fumihiro Sanada1, Yoshiaki Taniyama3,4, Rei Otsu1, Hiromi Rakugi2, Ryuichi Morishita5.
Abstract
Obesity and its associated chronic inflammation in adipose tissue initiate insulin resistance, which is related to several pathologies including hypertension and atherosclerosis. Previous reports demonstrated that circulating hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) level was associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, its precise role in obesity and related-pathology is unclear. In this experiment, cardiac-specific over-expression of human HGF in mice (HGF-Tg mice) which showed 4-5 times higher serum HGF levels than wild-type mice were used. While body weight in wild-type mice fed with high fat diet (HFD) for 14 weeks was significantly increased accompanied with insulin resistance, HGF-Tg mice prevented body weight gain and insulin resistance. The accumulation of macrophages and elevated levels of inflammatory mediators in adipose tissue were significantly inhibited in HGF-Tg mice as compared to wild-type mice. The HFD-induced obesity in wild-type mice treated with HGF-neutralizing antibody showed an exacerbated response to the glucose tolerance test. These gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies demonstrated that the elevated HGF level induced by HFD have protective role against obesity and insulin resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28273932 PMCID: PMC5427909 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00199-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1HFD-induced obesity is prevented in HGF-Tg mice. WT and HGF-Tg mice were fed a normal chow diet (ND) or HFD for 14 weeks. (A) Body weight was measured weekly throughout the experiment. *P < 0.05 vs. WT HFD group. **P < 0.01 vs. WT HFD group. ***P < 0.001 vs. WT ND group. N = 12–16. (B) Gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) weight. *P < 0.05 vs. WT ND and TG ND group. **P < 0.01 vs. WT HFD group. N = 5–6. (C and D) ND food intake (C) and water consumption (D) were measured in WT and HGF-Tg mice. *P < 0.05 vs. WT group. N = 4.
Figure 2Glucose insulin tolerance of WT and HGF-Tg mice during ND consumption. (A–F) WT and HGF-Tg mice at 8 weeks of age were analyzed. (A–C) Blood glucose levels under fed conditions were significantly higher in HGF-Tg mice than in WT mice (A), although the plasma insulin levels were similar in both groups (B and C). *P < 0.05 vs. WT group. N = 4. (D and E) IPGTT performed in 8-week-old male WT and HGF-Tg mice. N = 4. *P < 0.05 vs. WT group. (F) The IPITT was comparable in WT and HGF-Tg mice fed an ND. N = 4.
Figure 3Glucose insulin tolerance of WT and HGF-Tg mice during HFD consumption. (A–F) WT and HGF-Tg mice fed an HFD were analyzed. (A) Although the blood glucose levels were comparable between the WT and HGF-Tg mice, the blood insulin level (B and C) was significantly lower in HGF-Tg mice than in WT mice. (D and E) IPGTT in WT and HGF-Fg mice following 14 weeks of HFD consumption. *P < 0.05 vs. WT group. N = 3–5. (F) IPITT was comparable in the WT and HGF-Tg mice fed an HFD. *P < 0.05 vs. WT group. N = 3–4.
Figure 4Loss of HGF function exacerbates HFD-induced insulin resistance. (A–G) Either HGF neutralizing antibody (200 or 400 µg/week) or saline was injected into WT mice fed an HFD. (A and B) Body weight was measured weekly throughout the experiment. The BW at 12 weeks is shown (B). *P < 0.05 vs. saline group. N = 5–6. (C and D) Blood glucose levels under fasting conditions were significantly higher in the HGF-Ab groups than the saline group. N = 4. *P < 0.05 vs. WT HFD group. (E) Plasma insulin levels under fasting conditions were significantly higher in the mice injected with 400 µg HGF-Ab than in saline-injected mice. *P < 0.05 vs. saline group. N = 4. (F) IPGTT. N = 4–6 (G) IPITT. N = 4–5. *P < 0.05 vs. saline group.
Figure 5HGF inhibits adipose tissue inflammation and enhances insulin sensitivity. (A–H) The expression of inflammatory mediators in gWAT in WT mice consuming either an ND or HFD as well as WT mice treated with HGF-Tg. *P < 0.05 vs. WT ND and HGF-Tg ND groups. **P < 0.01 vs. WT HFD group. N = 6–8. (I,J) p-Akt levels of the liver, SM, and gWAT following insulin injection. *P < 0.05 vs. corresponding insulin - group, **P < 0.05 vs. WT ND insulin +group, †P < 0.05 vs. WT HFD insulin +group. N = 4.