Hillary D Lum1,2, Joanna Dukes1, Skotti Church1,2, Jean Abbott3, Jean M Youngwerth1. 1. 1 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 2. 2 Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, CO, USA. 3. 3 Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) promotes care consistent with patient wishes. Medical education should teach how to initiate value-based ACP conversations. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate an ACP educational session to teach medical students a value-based ACP process and to encourage students to take personal ACP action steps. DESIGN: Groups of third-year medical students participated in a 75-minute session using personal reflection and discussion framed by The Conversation Starter Kit. The Conversation Project is a free resource designed to help individuals and families express their wishes for end-of-life care. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-seven US third-year medical students participated in the session. MEASUREMENTS: Student evaluations immediately after the session and 1 month later via electronic survey. RESULTS: More than 90% of students positively evaluated the educational value of the session, including rating highly the opportunities to reflect on their own ACP and to use The Conversation Starter Kit. Many students (65%) reported prior ACP conversations. After the session, 73% reported plans to discuss ACP, 91% had thought about preferences for future medical care, and 39% had chosen a medical decision maker. Only a minority had completed an advance directive (14%) or talked with their health-care provider (1%). One month later, there was no evidence that the session increased students' actions regarding these same ACP action steps. CONCLUSION: A value-based ACP educational session using The Conversation Starter Kit successfully engaged medical students in learning about ACP conversations, both professionally and personally. This session may help students initiate conversations for themselves and their patients.
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) promotes care consistent with patient wishes. Medical education should teach how to initiate value-based ACP conversations. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate an ACP educational session to teach medical students a value-based ACP process and to encourage students to take personal ACP action steps. DESIGN: Groups of third-year medical students participated in a 75-minute session using personal reflection and discussion framed by The Conversation Starter Kit. The Conversation Project is a free resource designed to help individuals and families express their wishes for end-of-life care. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-seven US third-year medical students participated in the session. MEASUREMENTS: Student evaluations immediately after the session and 1 month later via electronic survey. RESULTS: More than 90% of students positively evaluated the educational value of the session, including rating highly the opportunities to reflect on their own ACP and to use The Conversation Starter Kit. Many students (65%) reported prior ACP conversations. After the session, 73% reported plans to discuss ACP, 91% had thought about preferences for future medical care, and 39% had chosen a medical decision maker. Only a minority had completed an advance directive (14%) or talked with their health-care provider (1%). One month later, there was no evidence that the session increased students' actions regarding these same ACP action steps. CONCLUSION: A value-based ACP educational session using The Conversation Starter Kit successfully engaged medical students in learning about ACP conversations, both professionally and personally. This session may help students initiate conversations for themselves and their patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
advance care planning; medical education; medical student; palliative care; patient–provider communication; person-centered learning
Authors: Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; David B Bekelman; Alexis K Huynh; Thomas J Prendergast; Scott Shreve; Karl A Lorenz Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: J Teno; J Lynn; N Wenger; R S Phillips; D P Murphy; A F Connors; N Desbiens; W Fulkerson; P Bellamy; W A Knaus Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Paul S Mueller; Scott C Litin; C Christopher Hook; Edward T Creagan; Stephen S Cha; Thomas J Beckman Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Kristen G Schaefer; Eva H Chittenden; Amy M Sullivan; Vyjeyanth S Periyakoil; Laura J Morrison; Elise C Carey; Sandra Sanchez-Reilly; Susan D Block Journal: Acad Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Carmen Wing Han Chan; Nancy Hiu Yim Ng; Helen Y L Chan; Martin M H Wong; K M Chow Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Connie Ge; Adeline L Goss; Sybil Crawford; Kelsey Goostrey; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Anne-Marie Shields; Catherine L Hough; Bernard Lo; Shannon S Carson; Jay Steingrub; Douglas B White; Susanne Muehlschlegel Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2022-02-21